Ovechkin being in this list but not Crosby???

40 comments
  1. Author is a self-professed Red Wings fan, so no surprise that the top 10 has 3 Wings on his list.

  2. This is a dumb list. Anytime the best isn’t Wayne just dismiss it. It’s usually someone who thinks they are smarter or has an axe to grind.

  3. This is actually the worst list of all time. Like why do we have a goalie at #10 when the list is best players

  4. Ask Siri to show you someone who knows absolutely nothing about about hockey and the authors name will appear.

  5. Lemieux is the most skilled hockey player ever and he’s at 5? 😂😂. And Crosby is a consensus top 5 player and not on the list? He’s WAY more accomplished than Ovechkin and he’s at 3, higher than Lemieux 😂😂😂🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

  6. Safe to say the writer or editor has certainly not watched the game of hockey. Certainly some iconic names on the list, but a heavy historical bias. It’s a shame an educational resource like this would be this foolish with their resources.

  7. I mean the first paragraph let’s you know up front it’s purely a list from one bias fan who happens to have an avenue to write such an article and get folks to rage bait over it.

  8. Ovechkin should not even be in the conversation.

    And neither should Crosby.

  9. Gretzy not #1? Mario at #5? Jagr not even there? Yeah, the list is bullshit.

  10. I cannot believe no one is questioning Yzerman’s inclusion. Dude was a Hart finalist twice, and never won it. Was never even a postseason All Star.

  11. > So, relying solely on my deeply held opinions, I’ve come up with a very subjective list of the top 10 hockey players.

    This is in the opening paragraph.

  12. This is the list you come up with if you’ve never watched the sport and solely understand the game through hearing your uncles talk about it.

  13. Any list that doesn’t have Gretzky/Orr/Lemieux as the top 3 should automatically be invalidated

  14. Ovi should not be ahead of Lemieux. And if you have Ovi, shouldn’t you have Marcel Dionne, or Sakic?

  15. This list is trash. Mario any lower than 2 tells you all you need to know. I don’t think Ovechkins own mother would rank him over Mario…

  16. It would be interesting to know what requirements /skills /traits etc she based her list on? Even as a non hockey enthusiast, I still know that Crosby should be on there. Maybe Guy Lafleur, definitely Roy, Plante and /or Brodeur again depending on her criterias.

  17. reinforcing people writing stuff like this by sharing it every single time. it’s what this stuff is designed to do

  18. Mario at 5 is criminal. This list makes no sense. Don’t even get me started on Goalies

Leave a Reply