They called this an out, padres coach kicked out as well for disagreeing also.

36 comments
  1. Isn’t he interfering with the player’s ability to catch the ball? I’m not sure if you need to actually touch the ball to be called for interference. Seems like it should be an out.

  2. Fans shouldn’t reach into the field. Calls like this will keep happening until people learn that.

  3. “Well he clearly intended to catch the ball, so thats good enough I guess” – Umpire.

  4. If you slow it down than scrub it you can see the ball change direction right around his wrist area

  5. Padres fan here: I think the call was it hit the fans forearm on the way down? It doesn’t seem like clear evidence but that’s the only factor I can think of? I believe it’s a home run, even if the fan didn’t touch it he wasn’t catching that.

  6. Well I would agree/disagree if you posted the relevant part of the clip, unless there is some reason you excluded that part

  7. Looks like the call was fan interference. Batter would be out in that case.

  8. “Spectator Interference

    Definition

    In every case of spectator interference with a batted or thrown ball, the ball shall be declared dead and the baserunners can be placed where the umpire determines they would have been without the interference. **When a spectator clearly prevents a fielder from catching a fly ball by reaching onto the field of play, the batter shall be ruled out.”**

    Clear out.

    Has nothing to do with touching the ball. Spectators were interfering with his ability to catch the ball by leaning in.

  9. This isn’t a good replay, it doesn’t show the ball caroming off the fans appendage.

  10. Watching this live, I thought it was a bad call; being able to see the ball deflected I think the reviewers were right.

  11. I don’t even care about the actual call but am greatly concerned at that fan’s catching “technique.”

  12. I actually don’t hate this call. Imagine trying to catch a ball traveling 70 mph and people are sticking their hands in your face.

  13. This replay doesn’t show the whole thing. The ball grazes the fan’s forearm. And also even if it didnt hit the fan, the line of sight is obstructed. The fan reaching out already compromises the ability of the outfielder to cleanly field the ball.

  14. Why would you share a video that starts SO close to it being in his glove if not to obfuscate what happened

  15. Wrong angle. It hit the fans arm. Plus, I got Robbie Ray going tonight for fantasy so I’m good.

  16. He is clearly out. It’s fan interference. If you reach out as a fan and break the plane of the fence or wall, you are interfering with play.

    There are signs everywhere. Don’t reach over into the field of play. He only reached out a foot or so, but it doesn’t matter, he broke the plane. If the fielder reaches over the plane to catch it, that is fair game, and a fan can take it away.

  17. Fan interference. Batter is out. The fan broke the plane of the fence or wall. Not by much, but you can see he did.

  18. Gotta be the most uncoordinated fan in the ballpark. Dude looked like he was trying to catch a beach ball.

  19. Kind of crazy how almost everyone in this thread thinks it was a bad call because they saw *one angle.* It 100% hit the fans arm before hitting the glove, that is textbook interference.

  20. right decision not sure why you choose not to show the arm graze just a sec before maybe you are padre fan but that’s a out.

Leave a Reply