Curious how they got a fraction of a percent though with such a small data pool (3|50)
6 percent of the time, it works 5.4 percent of the time
You guys are forgetting those 2 chiefs onside kicks that were recovered by the other team but the refs gave it to the chiefs anyway. Its chiefs moments that mess with the stats.
[deleted]
But then you add Kurt Angle to the mix…
They are including the four from week 1. Still a bad graphic though.
The math works, its just presented weirdly 3 successes 50 failures, for a total of 53 attempts.
3 ÷ 53 = .054
The numbers don’t lie, and they spell disaster for you at sacrifice!
They clearly meant it’s only worked 2.6 times and just rounded up to 3
Weird how being forced to alert the receiving team to line up in a formation designed to recover the kick makes it harder to catch them by surprise and win possession.
This isn’t the civil war. We don’t line up in an open field and agree to march single file. It’s a sport. Injuries are a common occurrence. Don’t want to get injured? Get a desk job like everybody else who failed to make it into the leagues.
I mean it’s AI, it’s not accurate, it’s just an aggregation of the averages of incorrect answers.
Its probably forced rounded up. 5.4% is thr actual.
Educated in the Baltimore School District?
Lol I saw that too. Their stats are off 56% (3/10) of the time.
either way, 3 for 50 feels too low. it feels like theres a better argument for just kicking off and praying for a defensive stop
give us the UFL 4th & 15. or just go back to the old kickoff formation rules
Maybe the % is including the 0/4 as well? Making it 3 for 54? That comes out to 5.5% so a bit closer but still not right.
Their entire broadcast is so low quality. During pregame they had a graphic onscreen regarding the Giants/Commies game, but they attributed the graphic to the non existent week 1 Packers/Giants game.
Weird, it’s not even right if you include 2025 too
21 comments
Powered by AWS, _Next Gen Stats._
Meh close enough.
Curious how they got a fraction of a percent though with such a small data pool (3|50)
6 percent of the time, it works 5.4 percent of the time
You guys are forgetting those 2 chiefs onside kicks that were recovered by the other team but the refs gave it to the chiefs anyway. Its chiefs moments that mess with the stats.
[deleted]
But then you add Kurt Angle to the mix…
They are including the four from week 1. Still a bad graphic though.
The math works, its just presented weirdly 3 successes 50 failures, for a total of 53 attempts.
3 ÷ 53 = .054
The numbers don’t lie, and they spell disaster for you at sacrifice!
They clearly meant it’s only worked 2.6 times and just rounded up to 3
Weird how being forced to alert the receiving team to line up in a formation designed to recover the kick makes it harder to catch them by surprise and win possession.
This isn’t the civil war. We don’t line up in an open field and agree to march single file. It’s a sport. Injuries are a common occurrence. Don’t want to get injured? Get a desk job like everybody else who failed to make it into the leagues.
I mean it’s AI, it’s not accurate, it’s just an aggregation of the averages of incorrect answers.
Its probably forced rounded up. 5.4% is thr actual.
Educated in the Baltimore School District?
Lol I saw that too. Their stats are off 56% (3/10) of the time.
either way, 3 for 50 feels too low. it feels like theres a better argument for just kicking off and praying for a defensive stop
give us the UFL 4th & 15. or just go back to the old kickoff formation rules
Maybe the % is including the 0/4 as well? Making it 3 for 54? That comes out to 5.5% so a bit closer but still not right.
Their entire broadcast is so low quality. During pregame they had a graphic onscreen regarding the Giants/Commies game, but they attributed the graphic to the non existent week 1 Packers/Giants game.
Weird, it’s not even right if you include 2025 too