[The Athletic] The 2025 World Series was the first to feature all of this

32 comments
  1. Am I reading this wrong? It’s saying Yamamoto was the first to throw a complete game? Mathewson threw 10 himself. Every World Series until 1959 had at least one complete game

  2. This is really terrible wording.

    With “a player to reach base nine times in one game,” which hasn’t happened in a world series before ever, you could literally list anything.

    Why not say the first world series ever to reach game 5? The first world series ever to feature a stolen base? The first world series ever to feature a base hit?

  3. Weird ass misleading post from The Athletic. Just post the unique only stuff from this World Series

  4. Ok, since Freeman hit a walkoff homer last year, it seems the list is about the first WS to have all of those together. Which doesn’t make much sense, because you can cherry pick stuff on any WS and make them look like something special.

  5. Dodger fans enjoy the parade and remember 49.75 states plus one full country hate you 💖

  6. Feels like The Athletic just discovered stats exist still, what a wild series though — every game had something historic.

  7. Wasn’t Yamamoto a winning pitcher for 3 games in WS alone? Isn’t that remarkable in itself?

  8. Don’t forget the missed ball in game 3 by Freddie that Tommy gunned to 3rd, and the relay in that same game.

  9. I’d be very surprised if no pitcher had ever thrown a complete game in the World Series previously. Highly doubt that one.

  10. Best World Series ever, that was awesome. Hope Blue Jays @ Dodgers is the season opener for next year

  11. A complete game? There have been 373 recorded complete games in the WS between 1903 and 1993. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  12. Cherrypicked baseball stats strike again. Did you know that the 2026 World Series was the first ever series to be played in October 2026 featuring an AL and NL team wherein the AL team did not win the previous World Series? Pretty amazing stuff.

  13. Did they get their facts from Google ai?

    Edit: Oh I guess i get it… horrible wording

Leave a Reply