Hilariously bad take. 😬

47 comments
  1. It’s telling he used Mandami’s supposed lack of qualifications as his prime example and not Trump.

  2. > There was a rite of passage, a method to get to that point. So to think somebody can just do what you took 20-some years to be considered qualified to, it is kind of insulting.

    Horrible mentality. They could recruit an 18-year-old straight out of high school for all I care as long as that person was good at managing a major league team.

  3. I like how he’s making it seem like Vitello didn’t pay his dues ā€œfor 20 yearsā€ like he did coaching in the minors and the like…except Vitello has been coaching since 2002, starting out as an assistant.

    Whatever, he’s just bitter nobody wants to hire his old ass anymore.

  4. Catch-22. We should not have barriers to entry in the name of ā€œtraditionā€ (the old ā€œi walked both ways up hillā€). On the other hand, there is definitely an argument for being seasoned. It’s an inherent risk on the giants part, but that doesn’t make it less valid.

  5. Makes me want even more for Vitello to have great success. Maddon was a great manager, but he’s had his chances. Why not think out of the box and give a good guy a chance?

  6. He’s insulted he was passed over. You had your time and won a ring Joe. Take the W and move it along.

  7. A far cry from the days when Maddon was considered innovative and cutting edge with his strategies that went against traditional baseball convention. There isn’t an infield shift drastic enough to cover for this awful take

  8. Wasn’t Joe Maddon criticized for managing in the majors when he never played in the majors? Who made him the drawer of the line?

  9. I’m old, and I have no problem saying this old stick in the mud needs to stfu with his ā€œback in my day a guy had to blah blah blahā€ take.

  10. “Quite frankly, I’m using the word ‘insulting’ only from the perspective that you don’t have to have any kind of experience on a professional level to do this job anymore,” Maddon said. “Because when I was coming up, you had to have all that, you had to go through the minor leagues, you had to ride your buses. I was a scout, I started in 1981, I finally get a managerial job in 2006. There was a rite of passage, a method to get to that point. So to think somebody can just do what you took 20-some years to be considered qualified to, it is kind of insulting.”

    Okay I can understand his frustration even if it’s a horrible take.

    “I guess the overarching point is, in today’s world, prerequisites to get jobs of this caliber, even jobs like the Mayor job of New York City now, it doesn’t require the years of experience that you may have had to have gone through in the past.ā€

    Okay gramps, because we all know your generation and years of experience has been wonderful in terms of improving the lively hood of future generations. If this hire pisses people like him off then I’m even happier with Tony getting hired.

  11. Yeah, fuck that guy. Acting like college coaching is an extracurricular activity. He wasn’t some kid just f’ing around, he’s been a professional coach that was coaching college. Not an amateur.

  12. Tell it to the commissioner. Wonder what he’s have to say about it? He’s never played Baseball and he’s the Commissioner?

  13. Wouldn’t be shocked to hear that Maddon had lobbied the Giants FO for a managerial job interview and was turned down.

  14. Eh it’s just kinda a boomerish rant not to be taken seriously. Plenty of managers that never played in the big leagues or had hof careers as players have done well for themselves like Jim Leyland and earl weaver

  15. Just to be clear, while I appreciate it’s college, he was pretty successful. What makes this any worse than say, Kurt Suzuki?

  16. The oldest current major leaguers were born in the 80s and grew up in the 90s. This old school mindset and the ā€œunwritten rulesā€ that go with it have been extinct for decades now.

  17. When someone gets mad that something was easier for someone else than it was for them it’s a sure sign that they’re at least partially a piece of shit.Ā 

    But pretty much everything I’ve seen from Maddon screams douchebag.

    Not to mention he makes an idiotic point. The goal is to make the team better. Management would have to be stupid to think “paying dues” is more important than putting together the best team you can

  18. The idea that it’s an insulting hire merely because Maddon had to pay his dues for 25 years to get a manager job is indeed a hilariously bad take. But if you read through the whole thing, he’s more nuanced than that. It’s not as get-off-my-lawn” as the headline and first paragraph infer.

  19. Joe Maddon is a whino that tries to hide behind an articulate vocabulary. He is nothing more than a hipster that will change to whatever movement is considered cool and edgy at the time but not quite mainstream. He’s the guy that tries very hard to be cool while pretending that he isn’t worried about other people’s opinions. If Vitello was a female or different ethnicity I guarantee you he’d be praising this hire from the mountain tops

  20. This is such a horrible take by Maddon. Why? Here’s a quick analogy:

    I host a small little television show, done it for 25 years. It would be like me calling podcasters “insulting” because they didn’t come up through the traditional broadcast channels. Life changes. Things evolve. Dude needs to get over himself.

  21. Joe Maddon can fuck off and keep on fucking off, and when he reaches the end of the world he can fuck off over that too.

    Signed, a bitter native Guardians fan

  22. Bitter take. I wonder if he felt like this with managers like Vogt who went straight from playing to managing? Where’s the coaching dues there? Every hire has an amount of risk. All it takes is one person to do something unknown or differently for the first time before others do it consistently. Time will tell if the Giants made the right decision. I’m ok with the out of the ā€œnormalā€ hire.

  23. He makes a decent point, but also you’re never going to get any new ideas if you just keep going with the status quo. There’s definitely risk with Vitello but if it doesn’t work out, it’s not the end of the world. You can always hire another old manager that’s been tossed around 20 teams later.

  24. As long as he has runners on third take more than a 3 foot lead in the 7th game of the World Series I’m ok with the risk of hiring a college coach.

  25. I’m a Tennessee fan, and idk if I’m allowed or y’all even want me to do this, but I’m sure by now y’all know the rundown. He took a program that had never achieved being elite, and made them elite year in, year out. He gets the most out of his players. He has a fiery disposition, and that rubs off on everyone around him. The League is clearly very different from college, and he will have to adapt. Hiring him was certainly a risk, ask hiring college coaches for professional teams always is. That being said, I truly think Vitello can and will get the job done. Y’all are my #2 MLB team now, and I’m excited to see what Vitello can do at this level.

Leave a Reply