9 out of 10 points from road is not enough for some. Bias towards Hart is clearly there. Since he came, this guy is going after VGK so much

15 comments

  4. That guy sounds like a dope.

    “Here’s these reasons we are first place, but I’m not sure how to read into them…”

    Umm, you read into them as being first place, ya fucking dolt

  5. It’s such a shame that this guy is the biggest content producer for the team.

    Ken is ass.

  7. StIlL TrYinG tO FiGurE OuT HoW to ReAd InTo That.

    What is this? A chorus to a terrible song? For now it means sole possession of first place

  9. This fucking hockey moron is going to be figuring out how to read into the advanced stats he posted for a long time since he’ll never get the correct take. I can’t stand this guy but I’m fairly certain he doesn’t know jack shit about hockey and has likely never played.

  10. I don’t really read this as being a negative. He’s saying he stopped 2 good chances but didn’t have much to do outside of that. Sinbin leans more towards the negative, which I personally enjoy because everyone just glazes the Knights in the media all the time.

  11. Ken sucks. He’s supposedly just reporting on VGK but has decided to hate Carter Hart, I’m assuming for off ice stuff, which is not his job. If he was constantly reporting on other players off ice lives it would make sense but he doesn’t. He needs to just report on the play. Carter Hart, whether you like him or not, was the difference maker in that game.

  12. “Still trying to understand what hockey is” is what he should say lmao this guy has always sucked

  13. I mean, Hart was only in net for 5 of those 9. This isn’t a very well written post for sure, but it’s fucking Twitter not the Times. And this doesn’t read to me like a critique of Hart, it reads like a critique of the knights. And he’s right. We did not play great hockey but managed to grab 9 points.

  14. Whether you like Hart or not, This guy is a shit stirrer. Always has been. Don’t take him seriously.

Leave a Reply