Why NBA Superstars are NOT being traded…

#nba

The NBA trade landscape has shifted dramatically from the era where teams would blindly surrender five first-round picks for a single superstar. Today, front offices and fanbases have become increasingly savvy, realizing that simply adding talent doesn’t guarantee wins and can even “subtract wins” if the player’s personality or playstyle ruins the team’s “vibe”. Modern fans are often more invested in watching their young core develop—such as Jaden Ivey in Detroit or Reed Sheppard in Houston—than they are in trading for an aging or polarizing star who might sit out games or demand a trade mid-contract.

This new era favors “calculated moves” over raw star power, as seen in the successful trades for Desmond Bane, Mikal Bridges, and Rudy Gobert. While these deals initially confused some observers due to the high price in draft picks, they were successful because the players were specific fits for their new rosters—whether it was Bridges playing with his Villanova teammates or Gobert anchoring the Timberwolves’ defense. These teams weren’t just hoarding talent; they were making sacrifices to fix specific roster problems.

In contrast, traditional superstars like Giannis Antetokounmpo and Trae Young now find themselves in a stagnant market. Despite their immense talent, the high asking price from teams like the Milwaukee Bucks—who are desperate to recoup assets after years of roster turnover—has created a deadlock where no one is willing to bite. Similarly, Trae Young’s polarizing style and recent injuries have lowered his stock, leaving teams afraid of committing to a Trae-centric offense for the next five years.

Even when teams do make big moves for veteran stars, the results can be short-sighted. The Golden State Warriors’ trade for Jimmy Butler on February 6, 2025, served as a desperate attempt to maximize Steph Curry’s window, but it left the team with an expensive extension for a player whose production may not match his pay as he enters his late 30s. Ultimately, the league is moving toward a “circle of life” approach, where success belongs to the teams that embrace their new, young players and move on from the aging superstars of the past.

20 comments

  6. 6:00 i appreciate you saying this. Too many people give him a pass when it's like, no, he purposefully tanked his trade value, quit on the team, pouted and sucked the energy out of the locker room, and had his agent tell teams that wouldnt pay him "enough" that he wasnt interested, tanking his value further. Primadonna diva move by someone with an ego far bigger than his on-court impact. Him getting traded was a beautiful day for the Heat, 22 belongs to Wiggins. Lets go Heat, trust in riley trust in spo, much love from the 305

  13. It’s also the second apron. Every single executive has basically said “going over the second apron will obliterate your team”. So given that the NBA basically has a hard cap actually trading for huge contracts becomes way more complicated.

  17. I mean, over and over it gets proven that there are no original thoughts, but then I watch a whatslaps video and I think, "This is way better analysis than I hear anywhere else. Is this dude like the Rain Man of watching basketball?"

  19. Every team currently thinks their young core can develop into title contenders like OKC. No one wants to be next Shai-Clippers but if things dont work, teams will again go after superstars. NBA changes every couple of seasons. I think if Nuggets don't win, they will trade Murray next off season

Leave a Reply