VINCENT TROCHECK TRADE RUMOURS WITH THE DETROIT RED WINGS: RANGERS TRADE PRICE REVEALED?

30 comments

1. I wanted the Wings to sign him when he signed with the Rangers. Hes a good fit. Hes like Copp with offense.

2. I'm alright with acquiring Trochek, but only after exhausting all other options. There's gotta be half a dozen more desirable targets.
   And if one of Kasper or Nate is the trade ask, thats a no deal for me.
   I'm alright with trading top prospects but not for the Trochek types.
   I'm saving those bullets for the blockbuster trade possibility ( Thomas, Robertson etc )

   I would want a roster player with salary going the other way in a Trochek deal, a 2nd rnd pick and middling type prospect is the type of deal I would be comfortable with, and that might even be an overpayment.

3. We will get somebody they want to waive + a conditional 3rd rounder that if Red Wings win 86 games in regular season next year will turn into 2nd. for Vinny.

4. thats too much for a 32 year old

5. i wouldn't give Danielson 1=1 let alone adding a first and third.. Please no more of this . Make a gaming channel or something please

6. I don't think people understand how little of say Rangers had in a Panarin trade with full NMC and contract expiring this year they were lucky to get ANYTHING AT ALL FOR HIM. Trochek has much more years left and only partial no move so he can be shoped around and sold to a highes bidder, wounder who are the teams he refuses to go are ?

7. Give them Justin Hol and a late third + retain half … And i might bite … But for real . Thought the roster freeze would spare me some days without … But alas .
   Lets see what free agents are gonna do first ..

8. Youd be better off going for a younger center because trochecks aav and term is so good for what he does. Itll cost an arm and a leg plus to get him out of NY this year. I feel theyre just as comfortable holding onto him and letting him lead our youth through this rebuild we started last year but announced this year

9. Wayyyyy to old. If you are going to trade for anyone please let it be for Robert Thomas or Jason Robertson.

10. Danielson AND a 1st? F**k no. Rangers fans are delusional. Finnie + a 2nd.

11. Bear + a 2nd rounder for Trocheck.

12. No thanks, dont want to make the same mistake as the rangers made

13. None of those for trocheck . For that price we can get Thomas or petterson . He’s over the hill soon and not worth that haul . Panarin for junk and they want this for him ? Yzerman isn’t stupid

14. Too much for trocheck

    He’s literally worth someone like Carter mazur and Michael Rasmussen and a 2026 1st round pick and 2026 3rd round pick

15. Carter bear is out of the question now to considering he's starting to make hat tricks. You will see Carter bear Shai Buium and cosa next year

16. I would actively stop supporting the team if they traded for Trochek

17. Pot calling the kettle black when it comes to saying Nygards name correctly…you should probably also learn.

18. Please don’t. The asking price it’s too high

19. STEVE ISN'T GIVING UP THIS MUCH FOR ONE PERSON

20. They are not paying that much for Trochek

21. Isn't Carter Bear a LW?

22. I think Danielson is going to get traded this year, to what team and for who, I don't know, but he's always the center of trade talks. If they trade Finnie I'll riot. He has been too good of a return on investment for what he's "worth on paper" I think we get more value keeping him than trading him.

23. All these clowns talking about Danielson, MBN, Kasper for Trocheck should take a hike. Like, is this a joke? NYR are not getting any of of our top prospects. I know the Canes and Wild would love to have him so it's gonna cost a 1st but Im not going too much higher after that.

24. While i like having mason appleton and JVR for veteran status on the team. We need a work horse like andrew copp, someone who is wants to keep their job, score some goals, and help with the offense. And we need another defensive stud like edvinsson because we are hurting without him rn

25. Trocheck can go to 20 teams. Panarin would only waive his NYC for LA. Look at what Nelson got for the Islanders. A 60-70 point center who plays physical, agitates, is a leader, plays both special teams units and is consistently over 50% on face offs. He is under paid too. He won’t be traded for scraps. The Rangers don’t have to trade him. He has years left on his contract. One top prospect and a first or two prospects is a reasonable deal. No team can hold on to all of their assets. Some have to be used to fill other needs. If Detroit can get Thomas—I would do that but he will cost more than Vinny.

26. Panarin forced the Rangers hand. Trocheck makes 5.5 x 3, he has a limited TC.. if he’s going it’s for a ton. Send him to the Wild ..Stramel and a #1

27. Trocheck and Panarin have nothing in common. Panarin gave one team and was a UFA to be. Trocheck has 3 more seasons on an INSANELY good contract. Trocheck is a center, is built for playoff hockey, is amazing on face-offs, plays PK, is a bit of a pest, and puts the puck in the net. He also doesn't have a NMC. With Panarin, it was move him or get nothing. With Trocheck, they can get a bidding war going, and if the return isn't to their liking, they can just hold on to him. Kasper isn't realistic, because teams don't dish players off their top lines to fill a hole elsewhere, but if one of the others + a 1st aren't on the table, then the Rangers can and should walk away.

28. Trotchek is close to 35. Not giving up a 20 yr old kid for an old man

29. They can have Rasmussen

30. Is that Danielson and Kasper for Trochek? Get the F outta here.