ESPN Analytics is up and here is breakdown of Giants 5th pick
March 31, 2026
ESPN Analytics is up and here is breakdown of Giants 5th pick
10 comments
How are they building analytics off of rumors and guesses? Is this need based?
The thing is though if I was doing this today I wouldn’t take the same player as I would have two weeks ago. The information is constantly changing so I don’t know really how helpful this is.
Honestly.. ill take any of em. Cant be worse than evan neal
Wtf are these numbers based off?
Feels like ESPN took the consensus and injected their own big board into consideration.
Wouldn’t take this seriously. Bailey having a higher chance than Tate or Mauigoa is crazy.
Anyway, I have a funny feeling it’s down to Downs or Love
These numbers are pretty shit. Mauigoa, fano, and loane are all more likely than David Bailey, in fact I’d say Bailey is one of the least likely picks the giants could make. Not just because he’s an edge but because his skill set is so redundant with this roster he would barely make a difference.
Bain and Francis are bigger needs than this implies, no? I have been assuming both would be off the board by our pick.
I got:
Downs 30%
Love 30%
Trade back 15%
Styles 10%
Ioane 5%
Everyone else 10%
What this doesn’t take into account is that I dreamt we took Mansoor Delane. So you can throw this all out of the window, we know the pick
Not sure what the basis is for these “analytics”. I’m hoping for either a trade down and/or Mauigoa or Delane. Either solidify the line or the secondary. Styles is an amazing talent but they just gave Edmunds a big contract and they brought back McFadden. Meanwhile they don’t have a RG and secondary is weak.
10 comments
How are they building analytics off of rumors and guesses? Is this need based?
The thing is though if I was doing this today I wouldn’t take the same player as I would have two weeks ago. The information is constantly changing so I don’t know really how helpful this is.
Honestly.. ill take any of em. Cant be worse than evan neal
Wtf are these numbers based off?
Feels like ESPN took the consensus and injected their own big board into consideration.
Wouldn’t take this seriously. Bailey having a higher chance than Tate or Mauigoa is crazy.
Anyway, I have a funny feeling it’s down to Downs or Love
These numbers are pretty shit. Mauigoa, fano, and loane are all more likely than David Bailey, in fact I’d say Bailey is one of the least likely picks the giants could make. Not just because he’s an edge but because his skill set is so redundant with this roster he would barely make a difference.
Bain and Francis are bigger needs than this implies, no? I have been assuming both would be off the board by our pick.
I got:
Downs 30%
Love 30%
Trade back 15%
Styles 10%
Ioane 5%
Everyone else 10%
What this doesn’t take into account is that I dreamt we took Mansoor Delane. So you can throw this all out of the window, we know the pick
Not sure what the basis is for these “analytics”. I’m hoping for either a trade down and/or Mauigoa or Delane. Either solidify the line or the secondary. Styles is an amazing talent but they just gave Edmunds a big contract and they brought back McFadden. Meanwhile they don’t have a RG and secondary is weak.