I’ve no idea why, but Kypreos is suggesting Demko as a goalie that “could be available” to the Leafs target.

20 comments
  1. Giving up Demko would require not only a huge haul, but they’d have to take OEL off of our hands. It’s never going to happen.

  2. Not now. 3 years from now maybe… if Silovs is ready to take the starting job.

  3. Kypreos does not use sources to create these claims. He just pulls shit out of thin air.

    Demko rumors last year + an overactive imagination

  4. On one hand, Kypreos usually just likes being inflammatory and making stuff up.

    On the other hand, saying “Brad Treliving is almost assuredly coveting a Vancouver Canuck right now” is possibly the most truthful thing you can say in all of hockey.

  5. LMAO 😂 Demko’s very brief mention in that article was absolutely random and unnecessary. It’s like Kypreos was trying to make it to 1000 words but was short on the word count so threw in Demko’s name in there and a bunch of words and clicked SEND.

  6. Now is not the time to trade Demko. Maybe in a year or two if Silovs continues to develop and looks ready to take over the starter job.

  7. Mathews for Demko and Miller?

    Treliving looking for a re-do on the Ktachuk trade

  8. Something like Demko to Edmonton for Skinner and picks, then flip the picks and xxx for a defenseman. That kinda thinking should be on the table, I would hope.

  9. Didn’t Kypreos declare the 2011 Canucks the biggest war criminals since the Bush Administration? Fuck that bitch ass mother fucker what he says, guy was shit as a player.

  10. Cause Kypreos is a Maple Leaf homer that likes to imagine everyone WANTS to be in TO.

  11. Kypreos came up with that one between pushes during his good morning dump. Garbadge.

  12. Probably for the same reason Demko was a Pittsburgh target as well. Despite what management has said, a lot of analysts believe rebuilding is the direction we’re gonna take. Miller’s name was thrown out there as trade possibility as well. Again, despite the fact management has made it quite clear we’re not looking to rebuild. Hronek trade made that loud and clear.

    Also, a lot of folks, fans included, are of the mindset we can just run Silovs cause he had a good Worlds run and a good year in the A. But this feels very reminiscent of the fanbase anointing Eddie Lack as the heir apparent. We probably shouldn’t put the cart ahead of the horse. We should let him continue to develop more before we sell off the only good goalie we have in the org.

Leave a Reply