Per NFL Networks Ian Rapoport and ESPNs Adam Schefter. Is this a move you would be interested in the Cardinals making? If so, what in your opinion would be fair compensation?

13 comments

  2. That dude is costing at least a first rounder.

    With how we play offense, don’t think it makes sense to invest rn. You’re gonna have Conner, Trey, and Marv getting the ball basically every play unless they’re getting spelled. Just don’t really see where he fits in.

    Amazing player tho

  3. He’s just leveraging for a new contract no way he gets traded, Washington would be cooked

  5. We are one quality WR short of an elite offence. I’m fine with making it happen

  8. I think he’ll re-sign with Washington when all is done.

    I don’t really want to trade for him and give him a fat contract. He’s simply just at that age where he can’t eat up that kind of money for 3+ years. Like, look at how Amari Cooper has fallen off a cliff and is still unsigned… and is only two years older.

  10. I would give my left nut to get him. Maybe even the right one.

    Realistically this is just leverage for his contract?

  11. Unfortunately, our team is all set. 

    We’ve decided Zay and Dortch are our guys. 

    Maybe Weaver too. 

    I don’t think our leadership is capable of throwing away prospects because a name came free

  12. 50/50 on it, if we get McLaurin the Cardinals offense is top 10 with MHJ, McBride, and Conner but I’m not gonna lie I’m ok rolling over cap to next season and spending on more depth players like DaRon Bland or Leo Chenal in Free Agency.

  13. Terry has no leverage. He’ll accept an extension in about a month. Nothing to see here. Move along.

Leave a Reply