What a dream if it actually happens.

32 comments
  1. Would be a dream, but just so it doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone, it’s probably going to cost svech, possibly nadeau and another prospect plus picks. Unless Tulsky pulls some absolute strings, be prepared to lose some familiar faces.

  2. Am I in the minority who is not all that interested in this? We would probably have to trade Svech (which is fine in a vacuum) but he’s the only physical forward we have. Does trading him for another, small, non-physical forward really help this team?

  3. We can’t lose Svech. The team gets even smaller at forward at the cost of 7 x 19? We need size and scoring together. Are they stupid?

  4. I’m interested, but I’d be worried what this would cost.

    This wouldn’t be a cash only deal or Picks

  5. I know in a value-for-value trade, we should be expecting to lose at least Svech plus a bunch more, but if he’s potentially saying he won’t re-sign with the Wild, they’re also in a tight spot. Might we get away with something like Nadeau and multiple firsts? Is that a non-starter situation?

  6. He hasn’t played a full season in the past 3 years. (75 games is close but im being pedantic) and he’s not that big. I know we’re the Moscow Short Kings but not the move for what he’d command in return.

  7. The Wild will never trade with us. Not after we fleeced them in the V1Ctor Rask trade. In all seriousness, it would be interesting to see what the trade package would look like. I know Svech keeps getting brought up, but I’m not sure if he would be part of a package. He has a 10 team trade list. Jarvis and Stankoven don’t have any sort of protection. I would be worried they might be involved. I would hope we don’t move them, though, since they have such good value contracts, and they just recently signed.

  8. And then he won’t sign. And then they’ll trade him back to the West for like… Laferrière and picks.

  9. What is this click bait ass garbage 😂 the entire thing is an opinion no report of any talks or discussions at all.

    Can we please not do this again

  10. Jackson Blake + 1st for a signed Kaprizov

    Kaprizov – Aho – Jarvis

    Ehlers – Stankoven – Svechnikov 

  11. Would not mind Svech going for Kirill, as much as I love the kid. That would be a solid upgrade.

  12. I’m not going to be able to consume all of the posts made on this, but here are untouchable Canes:
    Slavin
    Chatfield
    Nikishin
    Jarvis
    Aho
    Stankoven
    Ehlers and I think their contracts indicate as such? I’d be fine with Svech taking a new scene. Nadeau will need a new home if Kaprizov comes anyhow…. He’s a top 6 forward at some point soon, and there won’t be a roster spot.

    I don’t know what prospects or picks you’re all thinking, and I’m thinking those picks would be 2027/28 or later, and 2nd round picks …. Svech and Nadeau aren’t a downgrade for MN by any stretch of the imagination.

  13. The guy hasn’t played a full season in his entire NHL career does that not worry anybody

  14. Great player. Phenomenal player. Wonder what the locker room effect would be. Seems like a PrimaDonna at times.

Leave a Reply