Easiest goaltender interference call I’ve seen in a while
Really bad interference that should have been called immediately
No. Dude slated into the crease without the puck and made contact. Not even really debatable.
He skates right into the blue and the goalie without anyone pushing him in, the fact that you guys are acting like this is a controversial call is crazy to me right now lol
No goal. Good call. No attempt to avoid Freddie
Nope and I’m glad it didn’t that would of been some bs to end a game in OT.
Even though he seems to not be trying to hit the goalie directly.. the result is still him wandering aroudn in the blue paint at 10km/h and hitting thr goalie glove and lower body resulting in a drop puck and then a given rebound.
Its inteference
Nope.
Yes, simply because I hate Carolina but no because it was a good call on the ice.
Nah, that’s clearly goaltender interference.
This is a textbook goalie interference…
You want players ramming goalies?
Nah. Goalie interference.
No, easy call by the ref.
Depends on the team. Florida or Vegas? Definitely would have counted.
Nope. Easy GI there. He isn’t forced into the goalie- he took a path that caused him to clip the goalie.
Obviously the correct call, what’s even the question?
No goal.
Technically, it’s always been goalie interference, it was just rarely called for many years.
GI all day…no it shouldn’t have counted..
If you enter the crease and touch the goalie, you risk a GI penality
Is it called consistently? Hell no. But it can be called.
So if you choose to take that risk, it can go against you.
He was in the crease. He bumped the goalie. It did qualify for the penality under the rules.
Should it have been called, imo, its a coin flip, I can make arguments both ways.
But when you leave it up to the refs, thats the risk you take.
Who knows anymore, they change the rules every game, the answer with hockey it sometimes counts, it sometimes doesn’t, no one really knows.
That’s the easiest goal tender interference call I’ve seen since the playoffs
Looks like textbook goalie interference to me
No goal.
I hate Carolina, but by the standard the NHL applies, this is clearly goaltender interference. Player skates into the crease on his own, and makes clear contact with the goalie in the crease.
No, it should not. Textbook interference; the goalie is entitled to his blue paint, and Sanheim broke that boundary and was not pushed into the net otherwise.
26 comments
No way
Easiest goaltender interference call I’ve seen in a while
Really bad interference that should have been called immediately
No. Dude slated into the crease without the puck and made contact. Not even really debatable.
He skates right into the blue and the goalie without anyone pushing him in, the fact that you guys are acting like this is a controversial call is crazy to me right now lol
No goal. Good call. No attempt to avoid Freddie
Nope and I’m glad it didn’t that would of been some bs to end a game in OT.
Even though he seems to not be trying to hit the goalie directly.. the result is still him wandering aroudn in the blue paint at 10km/h and hitting thr goalie glove and lower body resulting in a drop puck and then a given rebound.
Its inteference
Nope.
Yes, simply because I hate Carolina but no because it was a good call on the ice.
Nah, that’s clearly goaltender interference.
This is a textbook goalie interference…
You want players ramming goalies?
Nah. Goalie interference.
No, easy call by the ref.
Depends on the team. Florida or Vegas? Definitely would have counted.
Nope. Easy GI there. He isn’t forced into the goalie- he took a path that caused him to clip the goalie.
Obviously the correct call, what’s even the question?
No goal.
Technically, it’s always been goalie interference, it was just rarely called for many years.
GI all day…no it shouldn’t have counted..
If you enter the crease and touch the goalie, you risk a GI penality
Is it called consistently? Hell no. But it can be called.
So if you choose to take that risk, it can go against you.
He was in the crease. He bumped the goalie. It did qualify for the penality under the rules.
Should it have been called, imo, its a coin flip, I can make arguments both ways.
But when you leave it up to the refs, thats the risk you take.
Who knows anymore, they change the rules every game, the answer with hockey it sometimes counts, it sometimes doesn’t, no one really knows.
That’s the easiest goal tender interference call I’ve seen since the playoffs
Looks like textbook goalie interference to me
No goal.
I hate Carolina, but by the standard the NHL applies, this is clearly goaltender interference. Player skates into the crease on his own, and makes clear contact with the goalie in the crease.
No, it should not. Textbook interference; the goalie is entitled to his blue paint, and Sanheim broke that boundary and was not pushed into the net otherwise.
No goal. No controversy.