These dudes took 1:08 to parrot everything that has been said before and had 0 new insight. How do these guys end up having an audience? I’m so tired of guys arguing bad points just to argue. Go bears.
I agree we need to see more consistency and continue growth. I absolutely disagree with “won, that should’ve been a loss” well it ain’t and that can be said about every game. If bears didn’t score and Washington won, that statement could be applied too. It’s a ridiculous empty statement sports ppl use when they don’t got actual analysis.
People really struggling to adjust their takes after closing the book on all these QBs after one season
The quote by Caleb is important. It does show that he and the team have bought in. That 50 burger by the Lions had me a bit nervous but they picked it up.
The almost got intercepted, almost lost stuff is stupid. That’s every QB. Every QB throws what should be interceptions. For two years now his td/int ratio has been fantastic. And generally the team with the worst mistakes loses the game. On Monday it was Washington. Like nobody says a team got lucky because of all the false starts. Those are mental errors. No different than fumbles forced or unforced.
The talk about Caleb will do away the more we win. Especially if Caleb is the reason for us winning.
Hard agree on the “almost interception” rhetoric crap. Watched a lot of games over the years that have been won or lost by a dropped interception. It happens. Go back to the 2018 season opener. Kyle Fuller dropped a sure pick 6 that would’ve been the nail in the coffin for GB. The next play Rodgers threw the game winning TD.
Caleb was offensive player of the week 2 games ago. WTF is having an average game on the road, in the rain, against a playoff team anything but a huge win for a young QB?
Like give me 250, 2 TDs, 0 turnovers every road game until the end of time. I will take it. And when the refs start seeing us as a winner we’ll suddenly start getting those down the field dpi calls too.
He also should have had a TD to Odunze if it weren’t for a bogus penalty and a huge play to Zaccheaus if he didn’t drop the ball. Also, who know what happens if Loveland doesn’t get called for another bogus penalty.
Caleb of course needs to play with more consistency, but there were so many “what ifs” throughout the course of that game that I think it’s silly to focus on some and not the others.
People love to talk about ALMOST turnovers but don’t bat an eye at almost touchdowns, good faith argument I’m sure 👍
Were the Commanders not favored to win? I would call this a “win that should have been a loss”. What a ridiculous statement, though.
Winning. Solves. **Everything**.
The “what if” argument is dumb as fuck. “It should have been a loss if Washington didn’t fumble”… “he should have thrown an interception”.
How about the odunze touchdown should have been legit. OZ should have caught the ball on third down and ran for a TD. The bears should have stopped the commanders multiple times on third down if not for “lucky” penalties.
Bears could have just as well won by 20 if we play the “what if”game.
Would love for everyone to stay off the train right now! Everyone collectively can somehow take a dump on the team then turn around and lick their ass with praise. Those same people will go back to taking a dump as soon as a loss happens (as if losses don’t happen).
There’s no need to hype up the team after 5 games. Force them to go out and do it again, week after week. Or else the people will find something new to say, “schedule, injuries, trade.. whatever” Personally I’m not gulping the koolaid yet until I see more, a full season on tape. These comparisons are just unfair, the hype is unfair, the slander is unfair. Let the fkn QB learn ffs.
Love all these bad takes just the fuel for our boys.
Confirmation bias at it’s finest, and it goes both ways. You go into that game not believing in the Bears of Caleb Williams, it becomes a heck of a lot easier to spot the bad over the good. You can go into that game believing in the the Bears and Caleb Williams, it’s easier to brush away the bad and see more of the good.
“If” analysis is just garbage 95% of the time. Not saying it doesn’t have it’s time and place, but to use it as the main reasoning for your overall analysis isn’t logically sound. We can go back and forth on “if” all day depending on what side you’re on.
Without the refs, Chicago comfortably wins that game. Like not even close.
15 comments
These dudes took 1:08 to parrot everything that has been said before and had 0 new insight. How do these guys end up having an audience? I’m so tired of guys arguing bad points just to argue. Go bears.
I agree we need to see more consistency and continue growth. I absolutely disagree with “won, that should’ve been a loss” well it ain’t and that can be said about every game. If bears didn’t score and Washington won, that statement could be applied too. It’s a ridiculous empty statement sports ppl use when they don’t got actual analysis.
People really struggling to adjust their takes after closing the book on all these QBs after one season
The quote by Caleb is important. It does show that he and the team have bought in. That 50 burger by the Lions had me a bit nervous but they picked it up.
The almost got intercepted, almost lost stuff is stupid. That’s every QB. Every QB throws what should be interceptions. For two years now his td/int ratio has been fantastic. And generally the team with the worst mistakes loses the game. On Monday it was Washington. Like nobody says a team got lucky because of all the false starts. Those are mental errors. No different than fumbles forced or unforced.
The talk about Caleb will do away the more we win. Especially if Caleb is the reason for us winning.
Hard agree on the “almost interception” rhetoric crap. Watched a lot of games over the years that have been won or lost by a dropped interception. It happens. Go back to the 2018 season opener. Kyle Fuller dropped a sure pick 6 that would’ve been the nail in the coffin for GB. The next play Rodgers threw the game winning TD.
Caleb was offensive player of the week 2 games ago. WTF is having an average game on the road, in the rain, against a playoff team anything but a huge win for a young QB?
Like give me 250, 2 TDs, 0 turnovers every road game until the end of time. I will take it. And when the refs start seeing us as a winner we’ll suddenly start getting those down the field dpi calls too.
He also should have had a TD to Odunze if it weren’t for a bogus penalty and a huge play to Zaccheaus if he didn’t drop the ball. Also, who know what happens if Loveland doesn’t get called for another bogus penalty.
Caleb of course needs to play with more consistency, but there were so many “what ifs” throughout the course of that game that I think it’s silly to focus on some and not the others.
People love to talk about ALMOST turnovers but don’t bat an eye at almost touchdowns, good faith argument I’m sure 👍
Were the Commanders not favored to win? I would call this a “win that should have been a loss”. What a ridiculous statement, though.
Winning. Solves. **Everything**.
The “what if” argument is dumb as fuck. “It should have been a loss if Washington didn’t fumble”… “he should have thrown an interception”.
How about the odunze touchdown should have been legit. OZ should have caught the ball on third down and ran for a TD. The bears should have stopped the commanders multiple times on third down if not for “lucky” penalties.
Bears could have just as well won by 20 if we play the “what if”game.
Would love for everyone to stay off the train right now! Everyone collectively can somehow take a dump on the team then turn around and lick their ass with praise. Those same people will go back to taking a dump as soon as a loss happens (as if losses don’t happen).
There’s no need to hype up the team after 5 games. Force them to go out and do it again, week after week. Or else the people will find something new to say, “schedule, injuries, trade.. whatever” Personally I’m not gulping the koolaid yet until I see more, a full season on tape. These comparisons are just unfair, the hype is unfair, the slander is unfair. Let the fkn QB learn ffs.
Love all these bad takes just the fuel for our boys.
Confirmation bias at it’s finest, and it goes both ways. You go into that game not believing in the Bears of Caleb Williams, it becomes a heck of a lot easier to spot the bad over the good. You can go into that game believing in the the Bears and Caleb Williams, it’s easier to brush away the bad and see more of the good.
“If” analysis is just garbage 95% of the time. Not saying it doesn’t have it’s time and place, but to use it as the main reasoning for your overall analysis isn’t logically sound. We can go back and forth on “if” all day depending on what side you’re on.
Without the refs, Chicago comfortably wins that game. Like not even close.