OTs 7 comments Looks about right. Fuaga played injured for a game or two, and really struggled. They both hold up relatively well, but when they get beat they get beat fast. Pretty much aligns with the eye test Well, this is less than ideal. Our two first rounders are at least performing at the same level? Lane isn’t even in the same category at this point Lane isn’t even in the same category at this point This is super deceptive data, it doesn’t take into account chip blocking, help, etc. I heard underhill talk about it a little bit in one of his pods So I’m gathering Fuaga grades out as pretty ass and Banks is fine but when he gets beat, he gets beat BAD? Would really love to know how Ram would’ve ranked in one of these. Such a great player. Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
Looks about right. Fuaga played injured for a game or two, and really struggled. They both hold up relatively well, but when they get beat they get beat fast. Pretty much aligns with the eye test
This is super deceptive data, it doesn’t take into account chip blocking, help, etc. I heard underhill talk about it a little bit in one of his pods
So I’m gathering Fuaga grades out as pretty ass and Banks is fine but when he gets beat, he gets beat BAD?
7 comments
Looks about right. Fuaga played injured for a game or two, and really struggled.
They both hold up relatively well, but when they get beat they get beat fast. Pretty much aligns with the eye test
Well, this is less than ideal. Our two first rounders are at least performing at the same level?
Lane isn’t even in the same category at this point
Lane isn’t even in the same category at this point
This is super deceptive data, it doesn’t take into account chip blocking, help, etc. I heard underhill talk about it a little bit in one of his pods
So I’m gathering Fuaga grades out as pretty ass and Banks is fine but when he gets beat, he gets beat BAD?
Would really love to know how Ram would’ve ranked in one of these. Such a great player.