New York Knicks Just Found Their MISSING PIECE…
So, the Knicks gave Tyler Kle some serious run last night. Tyler Kle logged just under 14 minutes and wow, every second counted. He went three for six from the field, giving him seven points on the night. That’s over 50% shooting. And considering it was opening night, and he barely saw any action last season. That’s a pretty efficient start. His only three-point attempt that went in came out of three tries. So, one for three from deep. Not lights out, but enough to keep the defense on it. Now, let’s talk about those assists, two of them, and more importantly, zero turnovers. That’s the kind of stat line that quietly does a lot of work. It shows he was making smart decisions, not forcing anything, and staying within the flow of the offense. He wasn’t trying to be a hero, and that actually made him stand out. Not coughing up the ball in your first real game time under a new coach is something that matters more than people want to admit. He also grabbed one rebound. And yes, that’s not a huge number, but again, under 14 minutes, he was active on the floor. He wasn’t just out there floating around. And when a guy hasn’t been part of the rotation at all, just getting involved is a win. You’re looking at a player who basically got zero run last season. And now he’s showing up on the box score with solid numbers in limited time. Three makes on six attempts. That puts him right at 50% shooting. One of those makes came from deep. And even though it was only one out of three, it still stretched the floor just enough. Defenders can’t sag off if he’s showing he’s ready to shoot it. Now, two assists in just over 13 minutes isn’t some monster playmaking total. But pair that with no turnover, and it tells a much better story. He was playing clean, controlled basketball. That’s exactly what coaches want from their backup guards. Someone who can come in, keep the offense flowing, and not sabotage anything, especially on a team like this that’s trying to get everyone involved early in the season. The Knicks had 11 players touch the floor and Tyler was one of the most efficient. So yeah, not just a throwaway appearance, he made it count. Looking at the rest of the bench, Kick’s efficiency really stands out. McBride took seven shots to get 15 points, which is great. Shame it dropped nine with four attempts, but Kick held his own with his seven points on six shots. He wasn’t out of place, not even a little. It’s also not just about what the numbers say, it’s how they stack up against expectations. No one really thought Kolk was going to be in the rotation, let alone playing on opening night. So, dropping in, going three for six, handing out a couple assists, and not making a single mistake with the ball, that’s how you make the coaches take notice. The whole night was a change in philosophy from the Knicks usual approach. Mike Brown clearly wants to experiment and see what guys like KC can do. And Cole responded by playing smart, efficient ball. Even with only one rebound, it’s more about the energy and movement he showed out there. In under 14 minutes, he finished with a better shooting percentage than Clarkson, more assists than Yabisellle and Gson combined and the same number of turnovers as a brick wall, zero. That kind of clean statline says a lot, especially in a game where every possession mattered. The Knicks ended up beating the Cavaliers 119 to 111. In a game where the margin stayed in single digits for stretches, those minutes from Cole weren’t filler. They were valuable. He came in, scored, helped distribute, didn’t make mistakes, and stayed ready. There’s also something to be said for confident. You don’t go three for six from the floor in your first rotation action of the season without feeling like you belong. And it wasn’t just garbage time. He was out there with real expectations in real minutes. It’s easy to overlook seven points and two assists, but not when you factor in the time he played. Efficiency matters. Production per minute matters. He got a chance and he absolutely did something with it. Colex showing didn’t blow up the stat sheet, but it was quietly one of the most solid bench performances of the night. That might sound like a small thing, but it’s exactly what keeps you in the mix as the season goes on. He’s not trying to dominate, he’s trying to contribute, and that’s how roles get carved out. one rebound, two assists, seven points, no turnovers. He played just under 14 minutes and hit half his shots. That’s called showing up when you get called on. You don’t need to be flashy when you’re that steady. You just need to keep doing it. And with the team trying to figure out the right rotations under Mike Brown, performances like this are going to matter a lot more than people think. It might not make headline, but coaches see it. Teammates feel it. Fans should definitely start paying more attention. Tyler Koh didn’t waste a single second of his time on the floor. He came in, did his job, and put up a box score that tells the story of a guy who wants to stick. And right now, he’s making a strong case for why he should. By the way, if you guys enjoy these deep dives, I’ll be posting every day. I genuinely appreciate if you could subscribe. Thanks. Anyways, when we talk about Kle, the first thing we talk about is his passing. Tyler K’s passing stats aren’t just good, they’re a statistical neon sign screaming, “This guy gets it.” Let’s start with the basic reality. He averaged 7.7 assists per game in his senior season. That’s not a fluke or a one-off. He averaged 7.5 the season before and 5.9 the year before. That three straight seasons of highlevel passing volume isn’t just rare, it’s dominant. He didn’t just show up and dish the ball a couple times. He lived in that role comfortably for years. By the time he wrapped his career at Marquette, he’d racked up a massive pile of assists. He wasn’t flirting with assist history for the program. he was rewriting it. His 18 assist game against Depal set a new single game record for the school. That’s not a guy who got hot. That’s a guy who owned the floor. Now, it’s not just about big numbers. Let’s talk efficiency. Because if you’re throwing that many passes, you better not be handing the ball to the other team like you’re doing charity work. Kak had an assist to turnover ratio of about 2.74 in his senior season. That’s strong. Really strong. Over the years, it stayed steady, too. Roughly 2.32 back. in 2022. Those aren’t empty stats. They’re proof he was creating without bleeding possessions. His assist percentage, how often he assisted on his team’s made field goals while on the floor, landed right around 22.22% according to the metric. That’s a solid figure for a high usage guard. It means he was directly involved in creating nearly a quarter of his team’s buckets while on the floor. Not with scoring, with passing. That’s floor control. And the turnover percentage, get ready for this one, 0%. Zero. In the data set available, he didn’t commit a single turnover per 100 concluding actions. That’s insane. That number’s usually reserved for players who never touch the ball or who just pass it to the coach every possession. K was initiating offense and still somehow avoiding turnovers like they were contagious. The advanced metrics back all this up. One of the most striking is his passer rating, 9.8. That’s not just good, that’s in the 99th percentile. There’s no subtle way to say it. He was elite. His creation metric, which estimates how often he created offense for others, was 5.3. That ranked in the 80th percentile. So, not only was he passing a lot, he was generating real quality opportunities. Then there’s load, which tracks how much responsibility a player has in initiating offense. His score 39.2, that’s 84th percentile. Translation, he was heavily involved in driving the offense, and the number suggest he handled it well. Now, his crafted offensive plus minus was negative 1.6. 6, which lands him in the lower percentile at 23. That sounds bad at first, but that stat isn’t isolated to passing. It folds an overall offensive impact and doesn’t always reflect role specific dominance like Klex passing game. Still, it’s worth noting because it adds nuance. He wasn’t perfect in every category, but in passing, he was near the top. Let’s swing over to contextual clues. In 2024, Kak was the number one assists per game leader in all of college basketball. That’s not just being good on your team. That’s being the best in the country. Not in the Big East, not among seniors, the entire country. That’s huge. And he did all this while playing heavy minutes. 33 minutes per game in his senior season. He wasn’t getting his numbers off the bench or in garbage time. He was the engine while the game mattered. And those assists weren’t hollow either. His average of 15.3 points and 4.9 rebounds means he wasn’t a one-trick player. defenses had to respect his scoring which makes his passing even more dangerous. He forced defensive rotations then punished them with precision passing. In that 18 assist game against Depal, he had 13 assists by halftime. 13 by the halfway mark and he ended with only one turnover. That kind of assist to turnover pace over a full game is just ridiculous. You don’t get there by playing safe or dumping the ball off. That’s command of timing, vision, and execution. The crafted turnover stat, the CTOV, came in at 7.7% putting him at the 60th percentile. That’s solid middle upper tier and it reflects how rarely he coughed up the ball relative to his usage. It pairs with that wild 0% turnover rate in other data. No matter where you look, turnovers just weren’t part of his diet. Now, some stats show a bit of a drop in pass impact when you dive deep. Portability, which estimates how well a player’s skills translate between roles or teams, came in at 2.9. That’s only the 36th percentile. It’s not a great score, but again, it doesn’t touch pure passing. It’s more about system flexibility. Co’s game at Marquette was built around him being the central distributor. So, of course, that number dips when you ask whether he can port that into a lower usage role. In the NBA, tiny sample size alert. He averaged 1.7 assists per game in just 7.2 2 minutes per game. That doesn’t tell you a lot, but it does hint that even with limited touches, he was generating assists at a decent clip. His projected assist per 40 minutes in the NBA was 9.5. That’s very solid. That means if you gave him starter level minutes, you’d likely get a highlevel facilitator out of it. And about his creation rating of 5.3, again, that stat captures his ability to generate passing windows and opportunities without just running set plays. It puts him among the top 20% of players. And that tracks with the eye test, too, because his numbers don’t spike from just tossing swing passes or dumping off in transition. He was creating angles and halfcourt offense, using ball screens, and manipulating spacing. That’s the stuff that moves the needle for team efficiency. The assist to turnover ratios deserve another look because they’re a huge part of understanding how Kak was so effective. A ratio around 2.3 in earlier seasons, climbing to 2.74 in his senior year shows progress and command. When a player’s passing volume goes up, but the turnovers stay low or even drop, that’s a red flag for defenders and a green light for coaches. The fact that his passer rating landed in the 99th percentile shows how far he separated himself from the pack. It’s rare air. And again, this isn’t opinion, it’s data. These percentile ranks are stacking him among the best passers in the country. He wasn’t just someone who could pass. He was someone who should be passing. Even that stat that said his assist percentage was less than 49% of players is misleading in context. Other sources had him assisting on over 40% of teammates field goals while on the floor. That’s a massive number for any player, especially in a power conference. And paired with his low turnover numbers, it’s more evidence that he had high usage with high effectiveness. The double doubles, there were nine of them in his senior season, most coming from combinations of points and assists. That’s a consistent impact on both scoring and playmaking. It means he wasn’t just deferring all game. He kept defenses guessing and made sure teammates got the ball when it mattered. And it’s worth noting that even with all that ball handling and passing, he never slipped into being turnoverprone. His turnover percentage stayed microscopic. And that’s not luck. That’s decision-making, discipline, and vision. There’s a reason he got compared to polished floor generals. That’s exactly what the stats say he was. His load metric, 39.2, shows how much offensive burden he carried. Being in the 84th percentile, means he was one of the most involved players on the court in terms of offensive responsibility. And he delivered. He didn’t just run the offense, he built it, maintained it, and made sure it was productive. One other thing that jumps out is his ability to rack up assists early in game. In that Depal performance, he had 10 assists in the first 12 minutes. That shows a player not just reacting, but setting the tone from the jump. You don’t get 10 assists in that span unless you’re reading the defense like a book and turning pages fast. Even when you look at creation outside of structured offense, he’s still up there. That’s what scouts meant by him being great in pick and roll. He wasn’t relying on teammates getting open naturally. He was manipulating defenders into leaving them open. If you total it up, 214 assists across 28 games. You get that same 7.6 per game average. It’s consistency across the board. And it wasn’t just big nights against weak opponents. It was sustained, highlevel distribution across an entire season. So, while some metrics dipped in a few areas like portability or overall offensive plus minus, none of them touched his core skill, passing. Whether it was assist volume, assist efficiency, turnover suppression, or creation rate, Cole consistently ranked near the top. And that’s not hype. That’s straight from the numbers. Tyler Kak’s efficiency profile last season is a perfect case study in steady progression, sharp decision-making, and statistical improvement in nearly every scoring category. Starting with the raw numbers, he averaged seven points per game, which placed him ahead of more than 45% of players in that same data set. not flashy, but paired with his distribution and low turnover rates, it’s part of a bigger picture where value isn’t just about piling up points. Now, let’s look at effective field goal percentage, 58.3%. That figure accounts for the added value of three-pointers, and it tells us he wasn’t just getting shots up, he was making them count. That mark alone put him ahead of more than 61% of players. It’s especially notable given that his points per field goal sat at 1.2, two, meaning he was consistently converting his looks into efficient scoring without needing massive volume. True shooting percentage followed the same trajectory, also clocking in at 58.3%. Which again reflects a level of scoring efficiency that prioritizes quality over quantity, and his shooting profile backed that up completely. His two-point makes were two, three-point makes were one, and he took just six field goal attempts total. That’s a tight, efficient shot selection with minimal waste. He wasn’t forcing the issue or padding stats with junk attempts. Every shot was calculated. On the advanced side, his shot quality was listed at 46.7, which slided him in the 35th percentile. That means he wasn’t just camping out for easy looks. A lot of his attempts came in tougher spots, which makes the efficiency numbers even more compelling. Combine that with a true shooting percentage of 45.3% in his NBA rookie stretch, and you get an idea of the shift in role and difficulty as he stepped up in competition. But even with that dip, he was still managing to operate in a role that kept his usage at a respectable 18.1%. Looking at free throw rate, he landed at 20.7%. That’s right in the middle of the pack, 47th percentile. While he wasn’t living at the line, the free throws he did take were hit at a strong rate. In fact, during his senior season, he knocked down 85.1% of them. And over his entire college career, 81.9%. That’s not just solid, it’s dependable. It means that when he got fouled, he made it count. And those are free points teams rely on in tight games. Three-point attempt rate is another area where things get interesting. His mark was 57.3%, putting him in the 78th percentile. That’s a heavy lean toward perimeter shooting. So, it’s not like his efficiency was based on easy paint buckets or dunks. He was generating efficiency from areas that typically drag down percentages, deep shots, and contested mid-range jumpers. And yet, he still hit 38.8% of his threes during that season, showing real growth and confidence from behind the ark. That’s a huge jump from where he started earlier in his college career. In the 2021 to 2022 season, he shot just 32% from the field and 28.1% from three. Those are rough numbers, no getting around. But what stands out is how much ground he covered between that season and his final year. By the time he wrapped his senior campaign, his field goal percentage had climbed to 49.6% overall. That’s a 17.6 percentage point swing from where he started. That’s not common. It’s rare. It reflects better decision-m, better shot selection, and improved mechanics. He made the changes and the results followed. His two-point percentage alone landed at around 55.2% in that final season. For a guard, that’s excellent. It means he wasn’t just launching threes and hoping for the best. He could finish inside, and more importantly, he was selective about when and how he took those shots. And don’t forget that two-point efficiency came with nearly five rebounds per game and 7.7 assists. So, he wasn’t camping in the corner waiting for shots. He was involved in everything. When you look at his overall effective field goal percentage across his college career, 51.7%, you’re getting a very clear signal of sustained efficiency. That mark factors in three-point value, and it shows that over more than 120 games. He didn’t just have hot streaks or one good year. He maintained a balanced, effective scoring profile. And again, for someone playing a dual role as distributor and scorer, that’s the kind of balance coaches dream of. Now, let’s talk about what happened when he moved to the NBA. The sample size is small, but the numbers are still worth noting. His true shooting percentage dropped to 45.3% in his rookie season. That’s a decline, no doubt. But the important context here is usage. At 18.1%, he wasn’t the focal point. He was in a smaller role, taking fewer shots and adjusting to faster defenses and longer rotations. And his minutes were limited, just over 7 minutes per game. You’re not going to get a full efficiency profile off of scraps like that. But what it does show is that efficiency at the next level is a process and he was just getting started. The question becomes, how did he manage to go from those rough shooting numbers in his early Marquette days to one of the more efficient scoring guards in his conference by the end? It wasn’t just more shots. It was better ones. He trimmed the fat from his game. No wasted possessions, no reckless drives, no overreiance on tough threes. He took what the defense gave him and when he pulled up, it wasn’t a gamble. It was a calculated decision. That’s how you raise your field goal percentage by over 17 points in just a couple seasons. Even in areas that don’t jump out, like offensive rebounding, where he was flat at zero, his percentile placement was around the middle. Not a strong rebounding guard, but not a liability either. Again, efficiency isn’t just about what you do. It’s about not wasting movement, not taking bad shots, and not dragging the team down with poor choices. One stat that puts all this into focus is scoring efficiency per shot attempt. He was right at 1.2 points per shot in that last college season. That’s solid. It’s the kind of number you want from a guard who’s also balancing playmaking responsibilities. It shows he was contributing directly to the scoreboard without overreaching or taking away from the team’s rhythm. And with just six field goal attempts per game, you know, his usage wasn’t inflating those efficiency numbers. He wasn’t out there launching 12 shots and hoping a few fell in. He was picking his moments, letting the game come to him and making the most of those moments. That’s the thing about efficiency. It’s not sexy. It doesn’t show up in highlight reels or make for flashy box scores. But overtime, it’s what wins games. And Tyler Kak’s statistical profile shows a player who understands that. He grew into his role, found his strengths, and eliminated the mistakes that hurt efficiency. He didn’t need 10 free throw attempts a night to get his points. He hit 85% of the ones he did take and kept the rest of his offense flowing through smart shot choices. And when you’re already a highle passer like he is, that type of efficiency just multiplies your impact. His shot profile leaned perimeter, but his efficiency didn’t take the hit you’d expect from that. A three-point rate in the 78th percentile means he was launching a ton from deep. And yet, he stayed north of 38%. That’s strong no matter how you slice it. And sure, he had areas that needed improvement. His early years had some ugly numbers, and his NBA transition is still in the early chapters, but you can’t ignore the upward trend. His field goal percentage climbed every year. His three-point percentage improved. His free throw percentage was rock solid throughout. That kind of growth isn’t common. It’s the sign of a player who’s putting in the work and adjusting as the game evolves around. He wasn’t just efficient on paper either. He played over 33 minutes per game in that final season. That means he sustained that efficiency while being on the court more than most guards in the country. No hiding behind limited minutes or specialized roles. He did it while being the guy. And when you compare his usage to his production, it gets even better. 15.3 points per game on just six field goal attempts. That’s squeezing every drop out of each possession. That’s what coaches mean when they talk about smart players. Guys who don’t waste possessions, don’t overdri. He ended his college career with a scoring profile that was high efficiency, low volume, and team oriented. He wasn’t chasing stats. He was taking smart shot, hitting them at a high rate, and doing it all while also leading the team in assists. That’s efficiency with impact. Even with the NBA numbers not fully catching up yet, the college data tells the story. Kolk was an efficient scorer who improved every season. He went from barely breaking 30% from the field to flirting with 50. He went from a below average three-point shooter to a near 40% threat. And his free throw shooting was reliable the whole way through. Efficiency is a long game. It doesn’t pop right away, but over time it shows who’s adapting and who’s just surviving. K adapted. He evolved. and the stats show it from top to bottom. Overall though, underneath all the numbers, rotations, matchups, and minutes, there’s something refreshingly simple about watching a player like Tyler Kle figure it out in real time. Not by lighting the arena on fire with a 25point explosion or diving into the crowd for every loose ball, but by doing the quiet things right. Making decisions that don’t end up on highlight reels, but that coaches remember. And when someone like that finally gets meaningful time on an NBA court, the results don’t scream. They hum. They hint. They suggest something’s taking root. Because let’s be real, just getting that time in the first place isn’t nothing. For a guy who barely saw the floor last season, being out there on opening night is a subtle sign of trust. Not blind trust, earned trust. the kind that’s built over time in practice gyms, in shootaround, in tape sessions where the coaching staff starts to realize, hey, this guy doesn’t need a leash. He gets what we’re trying to do. So, when that opportunity comes, even if it’s only 13 and change on the clock, the player’s job is simple. Don’t mess it up. And Cole, he didn’t just avoid messing it up. He added to the moment. What stood out wasn’t just what he did, it was how. Every shot had purpose. Every pass came on time. Every decision felt like it belonged. There was no panic, no hesitation, no wasted motion. And there’s a real difference between a guy playing with confidence and a guy playing with permission. Cole looked like someone who had both. That matters. Player’s first real NBA stretch isn’t about dazzling the fans or securing endorsement deals. It’s about answering questions. Can he stay in front of his man? Can he keep the offense organized? Will he protect the ball? Does he know when to shoot and when to pass? Those answers don’t come through in one possession or one highlight. They come in stretches like this one where the game is flowing, the starters are watching, the lights are bright, and the margin for error is slim. And if you’re not ready, it shows fast. But Kak didn’t just survive that moment. He nudged it forward. He contributed to the win. He didn’t dominate, but he didn’t need to. That’s not the role right now. His job is to fit in, not take over. And somehow by doing just that, he stood out, which is exactly the irony of players like him. The less they force it, the more they get noticed. It’s like watching a good backup quarterback run the offense so well that nobody panics when the starter’s on the bench. There’s value in that steadiness. It’s rare. And that’s the thing about Kak. He’s not built to be a human highlight reel. He’s not wired that way. He’s a rhythm player, a connector, someone who blends in until you look at the box score and realize, wait a second, he was one of the most efficient guys on the floor. And then you go back and rewatch the tape and see the subtle screens, the kickouts, the ball reversals, the defensive closeouts, the stuff that doesn’t draw gasps but stacks wins. His game has always had that flavor. In college, the conversation started with passing. And rightly so. He was the floor general, the assist guy, the player who knew how to manipulate the defense without ever speeding up. But even that only worked because of the efficiency underneath. Because he wasn’t just dribbling in circles waiting for a cutter. He was calculating. Every drive had a reason. Every look had layers. That kind of thinking translates. And it showed up again in his NBA minutes. There’s this idea that efficiency is something only stars need to worry about. But that’s not how modern basketball works. Everyone’s being tracked. Every action is analyzed. If you’re a role player, you better be efficient. You better contribute in your window or the window closes. So, when a guy comes in, plays a clean game, hits his shots, moves the ball, defends without fouling, and gets off the floor without giving up anything, that’s a win. Maybe not for your fantasy team, but for the team that’s actually trying to win games, it’s a win. And that’s what Tyler Kle gave them. He gave them stability. He gave them smart decisions. He gave them reasons to trust him again. It’s not about doing it once. It’s about laying a foundation, one brick at a time. And this this was a brick, a good one. Solid, measured, reliable. Coaches don’t forget games like this. Not because they change the standings, but because they offer glimpses. They show what a guy might become if given more minutes. More responsibility, more freedom. And when the rest of the rotation starts getting tired or someone goes down with an injury, that’s when these minutes matter most because the coaching staff won’t hesitate. They’ll already know what he can do. And his teammates notice, too. They see the guy who steps in and doesn’t skip a beat. They see the ball move, the floor space properly, the sets run cleanly. That kind of trust builds fast, especially on teams with playoff aspirations. Nobody wants a weak link. Everyone wants someone who can carry weight, even if it’s just for a few minutes at a time. K looked like he was ready to carry some weight. This isn’t about overhyping one night. It’s about recognizing what these nights mean. For a player trying to break into the rotation, it’s not about dropping 20 points. It’s about showing the game isn’t too fast, that the pressure isn’t too heavy, that the moment isn’t too big. Cole checked all those boxes. And he did it with a statline that reflects more than just numbers. It reflects poise. Because let’s be honest, it would have been easy to force something, to try to make a statement with a wild drive or a heat check three. But he didn’t do that. He played in rhythm. He stayed patient. He trusted the system. And by doing that, he made his minutes count. Now, will it be the same every night? Probably not. Roles shift, matchups change, minutes come and go. But what Cole did was plant a flag. He said, “When you need me, I’m ready. That’s all a young player can do.” And that message came through loud and clear. There’s something quietly impressive about players who don’t need the ball to make an impact. Who understand how to slide into the offense without disruption, who know that a good pass at the right time is sometimes more important than a highlight finish. Cole played like someone who knows exactly who he is. And in a league full of players still trying to figure that out, that’s valuable. It’s also rare. Confidence like that doesn’t always come easy, especially when minutes have been hard to find. But he looked comfortable, not entitled, not hesitant, just comfortable. That comes from preparation, from knowing the scout, knowing the system, and knowing that when your name gets called, it’s time to show up. And that’s exactly what he did. No flash, no fluff, no nonsense, just basketball. Played the right way. Clean, efficient, effective. You can’t ask for much more than that from someone stepping into his first real moment under the lights. And if this is the start of something more permanent in the rotation, it started the right way. At the end of the day, teams don’t win championships on star power alone. They win with depth with guys who can step in, execute, and give their team exactly what it needs. Even if that’s just 13 steady minutes of clean basketball. That’s what Kle brought. And if he keeps stacking nights like this one after another, there’s no reason he won’t stick around a while. Because in the NBA, consistency is the currency. And last night, Tyler Kak made a deposit. If you guys enjoyed this, I’ll be posting every day. I genuinely appreciate if you could subscribe. Thanks for watching.
check out the new channel please https://www.youtube.com/@bballexplainedd
subscribe for more nba content!!!!
inquires: ModernJamMedia@gmail.com
9 comments
Everyone talks about having a smart player and the Knicks have one on the batch wouldn’t be surprised if he starts a couple of games
I was hoping we didn’t dump him after the trade rumors.Kolek is gonna do well under Brown.He played in the 4th quarter during a close game so he clearly trusts him.
I don't understand the idolization for a guy that clearly isn't NBA talent. I am sure he is a good basketball player, just not good, talented or tall enough for the NBA. I was hoping the Knicks could trade him. I hope he plays ok while we're stuck with him, but I still hope they find a way to ship him out.
Having a smart, reliable PG to run the Offense off the bench is huge.
I love how he was looking out for OG!
I have been on Kolek since we drafted him , HOWEVER…. How does he stack up against players like the backup PG from Indiana & Pritchett from Boston? And I am not mentioning them because they're White either, I' mentioning them cuz They are the type of NBA players I ABSOLUTELY LOVE! Small, Fast, and SCRAPPY! I say they'd Blow right past him! If I'm Kolek, I'd spend that NBA money & Hire someone that works on my defense & Speed, and also weight training!
Ever since that NBA game he jumped in after clutching a G-League game solidified him as someone to look out for in the future
Salute! He's got skill…. but let him cook. It's game #1.
Um, 3 out of 6 is not OVER 50%. Its literally 50%.