It’s so frustrating to see when they voted against this play, but I am THRILLED when they can pull this play off because it just gives more credit to the eagles doing it the best. I LOVE to see other teams succeed in this play. 🦅Go birds

26 comments

  1. Genuinely believe if you’ve ran it you shouldn’t be able to vote against it, because no way is that in good faith

  2. It’s amazing how easy it is to officiate until a certain green team runs it, and then it’s literally impossible

  3. anyone got a compilation of all of them today? Be nice to just throw that in peoples faces next time they complain.

  11. “thrilled when they can pull this off”

    Most tush pushes today DIDN’T pull it off. They were mostly unsuccessful. Which only gives more of an argument for keeping it legal. OTHER TEAMS CAN’T DO IT!!!!

    1) It’s not harder to officiate because all those complaints are pre-snap, which isn’t relevant to pushing the tush

    2) It’s not an unfair advantage because nobody converts at nearly the rate we do (except Brady at 92+% *without* the push).

    Note: If it were such sn unfair advamtage and some loophole that’s harder to officiate, easier to get away with false starts, and is tooeasy to convert, thenEVERY TEAM WOULD DO IT EVERY GAME!!!!

    I saw as many failed tush pushes today as I did failed 3rd & 1s and 4th & 1s. Also, what I saw even more than rush pushes today were BALL-CARRIER PUSHES! How many times a week do we see a ball-carrier start to grt piled up on and slow down, still churning feet. It turns into a pile. Defense is tush-pushing the tacklers! Then the offense starts tush-pushing the ball-carrier. It’s xalled moving the pile. It happens multiple times per gsme EVERY FUCKING GAME!

    But it’s the black QB in Philly, so it’s bannable.

    The only way they could bannthis is with some cucky rule like, “you can’t push the person who takes the snap directly when under center within 2 seconds of the snap,” because you can’t ban pushing the pile.

    If this were the government, they’d call it a Bill of Attainder, banned by Article 1, Sections 9 & 10. It’s a rule that would target a specific entity. Complete Bullshit, and very cucky. “WAAAAHHHHH!!!!! WE WATCHED MAHOMES GET FUCKED IN THE ASS ANF LIKED IT. WE DON’T LIKE THAT WE LIKED IT!!! WAAHHHH!!! I LIKE THE CUCK CHAIR BUT DON’T WANT TO LIKE IT!!! BAAANNNNN ITTT!!!!!

    Cucky little bitches.

  13. Every other team is ass at tush pushes. Bills and Commanders that voted against it. Fucking hypocrites lmaoooooooooo. They not like us!

  15. It’s okay when they do it, but when we do it it’s a problem. A bunch of pots calling the kettles black.

  16. I’m not from Philly so I used to think the “media hates Philly” narrative was over blown. Nah that shit might be true lol. They get no love

  17. Eh, the pearl clutching about the play being called by teams that voted to ban it seem a little weird to me.

    If you can run the play effectively (Buffalo, Baltimore) and still vote to ban it because you philosophically don’t think it should be part of the game, I actually have more respect for your position. At least it isn’t just attempting to remove an advantage from a rival out of spite because you can’t execute.

    At least in that situation, voting to remove it is voting to take a successful play out of your own playbook, not just some hypothetical that you can’t do anything about either way.

  18. Because 99% of our plays are tush pushes. Saquan had 2,000 tush pushes last season.

  22. And the funny part is most teams are so bad at running the Tush Push…especially the Bills lmao

  24. It’s not in the read ahead packets for the announcers.

    I wish football had home/away tv announcers like baseball does it. They actually know their teams.

Leave a Reply