LOL. No idea who “Fansided” or Christopher Kline are, but this is an article floating around currently.

19 comments
  1. That would be great. His salary/performance will ruin any chance of getting better for the rest of the decade.

  2. Dodgers trading for Trout makes no sense in the first place. He’s going to need to DH at least part time to stay healthy, and the Dodgers already have Ohtani filling that spot every day. And while I’ll always love Trout for what he did in his prime years, at this point in his career he’s an injury prone part time outfielder with a horrible contract and a slightly above average bat.

  3. Dodgers has alot of cheap prospects and ready for MLB pitchers but Moreno is not going to swallow his pride and green light a trade.

    Dodgers has better and cheaper options if they are looking for a trade.

  4. If this actually happens I will formerly quit baseball as a spectator of 29 years and former amateur athlete of 18.

  5. If this means the Angels would go into a full rebuild mode and Trouty would get a ring I am all for it.

  6. And then right below it, there’s a highlight where the Phillies are predicted to trade for Trout. So which one is it, the Dodgers or the Phillies? PICK ONE. Jeez.

  7. Zero chance the Dodgers trade for trout. Only team I’d be scared of losing him to is the Phillies

  8. Fansided are articles generated by fans of specific teams, which is hosted by Sports Illustrated.

  9. I mean I’d be fine with it. Trout gets to play on a real team for once and see the playoffs and the Angels get prospects and out of the huge contract

  10. No way the dodgers would do this. They need to get younger not older and more injury prone

Leave a Reply