How can we send tweets to Brad? This would solve so much of our problems

28 comments
  1. There are a lot of teams who are going to want him. Question will be if we can afford him.

  2. Trade amon ra, sign linderbaum, draft a first round left tackle, 2nd round D End, hire Mike mcdaniels. Boom were winning the next 3 superbowls

  3. Pretty sure they were always going to do this? He’d basically be paid like one of the better tackles if he did.

  4. I continue to be surprised by how many folks think the Ravens will just let him walk into FA.

  5. I love how the sub thinks that any GM looking for a center isn’t acutely aware of this.

  6. O-Line are all grouped together, meaning you’re paying a 1 year contract as if they were a top 10 tackle. These never get picked up which is why IOL make it to free agency.

    This also applies to the tag for those wondering.

  7. I mean if they did this he’d be paid like 5 mil extra. Odds are they offer him a long term deal.

  8. If they restructure Amon Ra and Goff, which why wouldn’t you, they would have plenty of cap space. So then it’s just a matter of where does he want to play. He’ll get the bag. And it won’t be the Raiders. Because who wants to play for the Raiders if you have a choice. Nobody. Nobody does.

  9. I’m PRETTTTTY sure Brad reads r/detroitlions on a daily basis to make sure he’s aware of all his shortcomings according to fans. In fact, I believe that’s how he builds out his draft board.

  10. They declined this because his cap hit would be high. But they already said his contact would be a priority. I doubt he makes it to FA

  11. I would assume it’s just to redo his contracts going forward where the fifth year option was more than what the first year of a new Contract would be. I don’t see a world where they move on from him.

  12. Similar situation to future Jack Campbell. I think we decline his 5th year as LB get lumped together with some rush ends. Decline the 5h year but not intend on letting him walk.

Leave a Reply