I remember seeing this exact graphic 10 years ago used by delusional OKC fans to justify Russ > Steph.
Basketball isn’t about ticking the most boxes. You can be better than another player at only one thing and yet still be a more impactful player.
Also giving Coop “scoring” over Kon is laughable.
Coop is in the 32nd percentile for scoring efficiency, Kon is 92nd percentile.
There’s maybe 1 or 2 good teams in the league right now who would rather have rookie Coop than rookie Kon for just this year.
It’s already been decided. This shit is narrative based, no logical. Half or maybe even more of the people that vote for this award don’t even watch maverick games lol.
This is getting embarrassing
I think Coop the kinda guy to always use the fact he didn’t win ROTY as a chip on his shoulder and I like that a lot
8 comments
If you ask me I think we’re cooked.
is Kon still in 50 40 90 range?
We deserve it dammit!!!
What kinda stat is impact?
I remember seeing this exact graphic 10 years ago used by delusional OKC fans to justify Russ > Steph.
Basketball isn’t about ticking the most boxes. You can be better than another player at only one thing and yet still be a more impactful player.
Also giving Coop “scoring” over Kon is laughable.
Coop is in the 32nd percentile for scoring efficiency, Kon is 92nd percentile.
There’s maybe 1 or 2 good teams in the league right now who would rather have rookie Coop than rookie Kon for just this year.
It’s already been decided. This shit is narrative based, no logical. Half or maybe even more of the people that vote for this award don’t even watch maverick games lol.
This is getting embarrassing
I think Coop the kinda guy to always use the fact he didn’t win ROTY as a chip on his shoulder and I like that a lot