For the past five years, Torii Hunter has hovered around the edges of the Hall of Fame conversation, without gaining the traction needed for a serious push. His candidacy has lived in that tricky gray area where voters clearly respect his career, but hesitate to elevate him into Cooperstown territory. That uncertainty is common with players whose value extends beyond the numbers, and Hunter’s résumé has long walked that line.
But the current voting cycle may finally give him the opening he needs. With a historically thin ballot for 2026, voters may begin reassessing holdover candidates, especially those whose contributions to the sport transcend simple statistical comparison. Hunter fits that mold better than almost anyone still on the ballot, and the timing has never been more favorable.
Reviewing the 2026 Ballot
The 2026 ballot is shaping up to be one of the weakest in recent memory. According to Jay Jaffe, this will be the first time since 2008 that six or fewer candidates on the ballot carry a JAWS score of at least 50.
JAWS is an acronym for the Jaffe Wins Above Replacement Score, a system created to evaluate a baseball player’s worthiness for induction into the National Baseball Hall of Fame. It compares a candidate’s statistics to the average Hall of Famer at their position by averaging their career WAR (Wins Above Replacement) with the total WAR from their best seven seasons (peak WAR). The goal is to identify players who are at least as good as the average Hall of Famer, using a metric that balances career value with peak performance. It is rare for a ballot to lack clear-cut newcomers, and that scarcity could shift attention toward long-term holdovers like Hunter.
None of the first-time players is projected to gain significant traction. The 12 newcomers include Ryan Braun, Shin-Soo Choo, Edwin Encarnacion, Gio Gonzalez, Alex Gordon, Cole Hamels, Matt Kemp, Howie Kendrick, Nick Markakis, Daniel Murphy, Hunter Pence, and Rick Porcello. While many of those names bring strong careers and memorable moments, they fall short of the typical Hall of Fame profile.
Hamels is the most compelling. He finished his 15-year career with a 3.43 ERA, a 123 ERA+, and 2,560 strikeouts. He owns a World Series MVP trophy and had several ace-level seasons, but analysts remain split on whether that résumé will launch him toward the Hall.
Among position players, Braun is the headliner, based strictly on production. He won Rookie of the Year and an MVP, made six All-Star teams, and hit 352 home runs with six 30-homer seasons. He even posted back-to-back 30/30 campaigns in 2011 and 2012. However, multiple suspensions for performance-enhancing drugs complicate (and likely sink) his candidacy.
With no overpowering newcomers and few returning candidates separating themselves in recent years, the subsequent two cycles could create space for overlooked players to climb. That includes Hunter.
Hunter’s Hall of Fame History
Hunter debuted on the Hall of Fame ballot in 2021 and has remained on the edge of survival ever since. Candidates must receive at least five percent of the vote to stay on the ballot, and Hunter has flirted dangerously with that cutoff multiple times. His results so far:
2021 BBWAA: 9.5 percent
2022 BBWAA: 5.3 percent
2023 BBWAA: 6.9 percent
2024 BBWAA: 7.3 percent
2025 BBWAA: 5.1 percent
He has never received double-digit support, and recent slippage might concern some Twins fans. Yet hovering between five and ten percent can also signal that a player has a loyal block of voters and could expand their support under the right ballot conditions.
The Case For Hunter
Hunter’s defining skill was his game-changing defense. Nicknamed “Spider-Man” for his leaping robberies at the wall, he collected nine Gold Gloves over a 10-year stretch. Few outfielders of his era controlled center field as completely as Hunter did, and his highlight-reel plays remain essential vignettes of early 2000s baseball. Only seven players in MLB history have hit 350 or more home runs while also winning at least nine Gold Gloves, an exclusive group that underscores his rare two-way impact.
His offensive résumé, while not elite by Hall standards, is undeniably strong. Hunter finished with 353 home runs, 498 doubles, over 2,400 hits, and 195 stolen bases. He earned two Silver Sluggers and became a five-time All-Star. Hunter blended power, speed, and creativity in a way that made him a constant threat and a difficult matchup for pitchers.
Beyond the numbers, Hunter’s leadership and personality left a lasting mark everywhere he played. From Minnesota to Anaheim to Detroit, he was viewed as a franchise culture setter, an ambassador for the sport, and a respected veteran who influenced winning clubs. Voters who prioritize intangibles often keep players like Hunter in the conversation longer than the metrics alone suggest.
The Case Against Hunter
Hunter’s overall offensive profile falls short of Cooperstown norms. His career .277 average with a .331 on-base percentage and .461 slugging average places him comfortably above average, but not close to the offensive standard for Hall of Fame outfielders. His 110 career OPS+ means he was just 10% better than average over a long career.
Defensively, the numbers diverge sharply from the reputation. While Hunter’s early career metrics were exceptional, the second half of his career tells a different story. From 2006 through his retirement in 2015, advanced metrics rated him as a below-average defender, even after moving to right field. His total defensive rating lands at -7.9, a reminder that defensive value can erode quickly and dramatically in a player’s thirties.
His postseason record does little to bolster his candidacy. In 48 playoff games, Hunter hit .274/.340/.414 with four home runs, three of which came as a Twin. While those numbers are respectable, they lack signature October moments and include several defensive miscues that fans still remember. Voters often look for postseason excellence to elevate borderline candidates, and Hunter does not benefit from that boost.
One of the biggest challenges for Hunter is how voters interpret the two halves of his career. From 1997 through 2007, he was a premier center fielder with elite defensive value and above-average hitting. From 2008 through 2015, his bat improved while his glove declined, making him a good but no longer great two-way player. His placement at 35th among center fielders in JAWS, trailing players like Curtis Granderson, Bernie Williams, and Andrew McCutchen, creates another hurdle. All three names are widely viewed as excellent players but not Hall of Famers, which impacts how Hunter’s case is perceived.
The Path Ahead
The Hall of Fame ballot is always competitive, and Hunter still faces a steep climb. But with the 2026 ballot featuring few compelling options and the current cycle offering voters a chance to reevaluate candidates in the middle tier of support, the environment could be shifting in his favor. Ballots like these have historically helped overlooked players make incremental gains, sometimes setting the stage for long-term campaigns.
Do you believe Hunter deserves more support on the Hall of Fame ballot? How do you evaluate players with careers that blend elite peaks and uneven longevity? Leave a comment and start the discussion.
Are you interested in Twins history? Then check out the Minnesota Twins Players Project, a community-driven project to discover and collect great information on every player to wear a Twins uniform!