This weekend was the weekend of the aftermath of anger. Thursday night saw the Dodgers value Kyle Tucker at $60 million per season, handing him the short term contract he desired to play baseball in a low profile. Bo Bichette decided to take a player friendly deal with the Mets over the security of a long term deal with the Phillies, allowing him to check out the free agent market next season if he desires.
They’re both a pain in the booty.
However, today’s question is: which one is more aggravating – Tucker or Bichette? On one hand, the richer got richer-er when the Dodgers grabbed Tucker, seemingly throwing caution to the wind when it came to deferred finances. Bichette’s going to the Mets not only spurned the Phillies, but did strengthen a division rival. They’re both aggravating in their own right, but which one takes the cake more?