Tua Tagovailoa's 'dead cap money' provides a lesson for MLB's future

The headlines fairly leap off the pages, suggesting calamity will be visited upon what was once a storied NFL franchise.

Dolphins to release Tua Tagovailoa, take on record dead-cap hit…Dolphins to eat record $99.2 million dead money…

To the untrained eye, it’s tempting to send thoughts and prayers out to the Miami Dolphins and their owner, Stephen Ross. Hey, leaving a briefcase open with $100 million in it as you tool around in your convertible is a bummer, regardless of how much cash you’ve stashed offshore.

Funny thing is, though, that this “loss” will do nothing to imperil the Dolphins’ potential franchise value of $12 billion, nor Ross’s net worth of $17 billion.

See, the Dolphins won’t be paying Tagovailoa all that money. Just $167 million of his four-year, $212.4 million deal signed before the 2024 season was guaranteed. That means they’ll have paid him – in physical, depositable money – $55.6 million for the three years he quarterbacked the Dolphins.

Strange as it sounds, that’s more or less the going rate for marquee quarterbacks these days. (The debate over Tua’s bona fides in that department are for another day, or a better-qualified human).

No, the calamity for the Dolphins is over the “dead cap space” that Tagovailoa’s contract consumes. And as Major League Baseball and its fans ruminate over, for the umpteenth time, a salary cap in forthcoming collective bargaining talks, it’s worth examining what “dead money” means to both the football and baseball fan, in addition to the athletes in the arena.

Dollar, dollar bills

Baseball knows of dead money. It can be a real bummer, the bill coming due for dynasties long since passed, or players who break down before their time.

The difference is, MLB owners still must write the checks – and the athletes who earned them will be entitled to it.

Nick Castellanos’ five-year, $100 million deal with the Phillies pays him $20 million this year. Know how much he’ll receive? Twenty million dollars, with Philly footing all that bill minus the minimum wage San Diego will pay to scoop him up.

DJ LeMahieu won’t play an inning for the Yankees this year; they released him knowing he’ll earn $15 million in 2026, the last of his six-year, $90 million deal. And Hal Steinbrenner will scratch every check to make LeMahieu whole, money LeMahieu earned when he finished third in the 2020 AL MVP race, establishing his market value.

Somehow, the Yankees and Phillies will field competitive teams this year.

1 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$765,000,000: Juan Soto, New York Mets (2025-39)

1 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$765,000,000: Juan Soto, New York Mets (2025-39)

2 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$700,000,000: Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers (2024-33)

3 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$500,000,000: Vladimir Guerrero, Jr., Toronto Blue Jays (2026-39)

4 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$426.5 million: Mike Trout, Los Angeles Angels (2019-2030)* includes extension

5 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$365 million: Mookie Betts, Los Angeles Dodgers (2020-32)

6 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$360 million: Aaron Judge, New York Yankees (2023-2031)

7 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$350 million: Manny Machado, San Diego Padres (2023-33)

8 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$341 million: Francisco Lindor, New York Mets (2022-31)

9 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$340 million: Fernando Tatis Jr., San Diego Padres (2021-34)

10 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$330,000,000: Bryce Harper, Philadelphia Phillies (2019-31)

11 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$325 million: Giancarlo Stanton, Miami Marlins (2015-2027) – traded to New York Yankees in 2017

12 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$325 million: Corey Seager, Texas Rangers (2022-31)

13 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$325,000,000: Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Los Angeles Dodgers (2024-35)

14 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$313.5 million: Rafael Devers, Boston Red Sox (2024-33) – traded to San Francisco Giants in 2025

15 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$300 million: Trea Turner, Philadelphia Phillies (2023-33)

16 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$292 million: Miguel Cabrera, Detroit Tigers (2014-2023)* includes extension

17 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$288,777,777: Bobby Witt Jr., Kansas City Royals (2024-34)

18 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$280 million: Xander Bogaerts, San Diego Padres (2023-33)

19 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$275 million: Alex Rodriguez, New York Yankees (2008-2017)

20 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$260 million: Nolan Arenado, Colorado Rockies (2019-26) – traded to St. Louis Cardinals in 2021, traded to Arizona Diamondbacks in 2026

21 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$252,000,000: Alex Rodriguez, Texas Rangers (2001-10)

22 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$245 million: Stephen Strasburg, Washington Nationals (2020-26)

23 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$245 million: Anthony Rendon, Los Angeles Angels (2020-26)

24 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$240,000,000: Kyle Tucker, Los Angeles Dodgers (2026-29)

25 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$240 million: Albert Pujols, Los Angeles Angels (2012-2021)

26 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$240 million: Robinson Cano, Seattle Mariners (2014-2023) – traded to New York Mets in 2019

27 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$225 million: Joey Votto, Cincinnati Reds (2012-2021)

28 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$218,000,000: Max Fried, New York Yankees (2025-32)

29 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$217 million: David Price, Boston Red Sox (2016-2022) – traded to Los Angeles Dodgers in 2020

30 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$215 million: Clayton Kershaw, Los Angeles Dodgers (2014-2020)

31 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$215 million: Christian Yelich, Milwaukee Brewers (2020-28)

32 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$214 million: Prince Fielder, Detroit Tigers (2012-2020) – traded to Texas Rangers in 2013

33 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$212 million: Austin Riley, Atlanta Braves (2023-32)

34 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$210 million: Corbin Burnes, Arizona Diamondbacks (2025-30)

35 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$210 million: Max Scherzer, Washington Nationals (2015-2021)

36 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$209.3 million: Julio Rodriguez, Seattle Mariners (2023-34)

37 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$206.5 million: Zack Greinke, Arizona Diamondbacks (2016-2021) – traded to Houston Astros in 2019

38 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$202,000,000: CC Sabathia, New York Yankees (2009-17)

39 / 39

MLB’s $200+ million contracts

$200 million: Carlos Correa, Minnesota Twins (2023-28) – traded to Houston Astros in 2025

As for the Dolphins? Well, not only do they not have to pay Tagovailoa, they also get, in a sense, a golden ticket to be non-competitive in the foreseeable future. Not to get too far in the weeds, but they can, in fact, spread out the “dead cap hit” over two seasons.

Yet that much “dead space” under a $300 million cap while fielding a 53-man roster is undeniably onerous. And gives Miami a built-in excuse when it misses the playoffs for the eighth time in the past 10 seasons.

The owners win on both sides of the equation – they only have to pay so much guaranteed money to retain their marquee players. And if a deal goes awry, well, they simply don’t have the “cap space” to pay other players to make their team better, thus depressing those players’ markets.

Additionally, Ross will only shoulder so much of the blame if the Dolphins continue to suck. Hey, blame Tua! Greedy athlete, putting his livelihood on the line and expecting to be paid for it.

MLB teams walk the line

This is the reality MLB’s franchise, players and fans might face in a capped world. As we’ve come to find out the past half-century, free agency generates tremendous interest in the game.

Nothing fires up a fan base quite so much as a franchise swinging for the fences, willing to dip into its profits to make the team better. And when the franchise is on an upswing, having the ability to splurge a bit more – on a key reliever, an extra starting pitcher, a bit of platoon depth – is all the more important.

All the discourse about a cap has essentially zeroed in on one team – the Los Angeles Dodgers, who draft well, play within the rules and field exciting ballclubs. They win, and 4 million people saw fit to come through the turnstiles last year.

The New York Mets have caught some of that heat as well, yet they have been wise enough to not win too much. Good boy, Steve Cohen.

Yet there’s a much larger swath of big-league clubs for which freedom is important. And by freedom we mean, the ability to duck above or below baseball’s luxury tax levels – yes, a plateau that also forces owners to fork over money – as they see fit.

During the past decade, here’s a look at the teams that have gone above and below the tax level:

Los Angeles Dodgers and Angels, New York Mets and Yankees, Atlanta Braves, Chicago Cubs, San Diego Padres, San Francisco Giants, Washington Nationals, Boston Red Sox, Detroit Tigers, Houston Astros, Texas Rangers, Toronto Blue Jays.

That’s 13 teams – nearly half the league – exercising the freedom to splurge when they want to or save when it’s more prudent. Seven of those 13 have won World Series in that span, nine reaching at least a league championship series.

A handful of others – Seattle Mariners, Arizona Diamondbacks, Baltimore Orioles – might eventually climb above the line, too, as their on-field fortunes continue to improve. While owners love to use the Pittsburgh Pirates or Kansas City Royals – your 2015 World Series champions – as the avatars for all that is wrong, the system seems to work pretty well for everyone, save for fans in markets where the concept of spending money to make money is foreign.

Meanwhile, the Dolphins will stagger along with their “dead cap money” as some artificial cross to bear. Fans and analysts will nod somberly, starting the countdown clock until the sheets are once again clean.

As MLB embarks on a season in which all but perhaps five teams – some of them former luxury-tax exceeders – harbor legitimate playoff hopes, it’s worth noting that it simply doesn’t have to be that way.

1 / 19