Baseball may be America’s favorite pastime, but complaining about baseball might be a close second.
We all look forward to a great game-day experience, but sometimes the ballpark itself can make or break the day. From parking nightmares and endless concession lines to bad service and overpriced hotdogs, not every MLB stadium delivers the same experience.
We analyzed 130,000+ fan reviews across all 30 MLB stadiums to see which ballparks earn the most praise, and which draws the most complaints. Rankings are based on positive and negative sentiments across four categories: facilities (e.g. parking, bathroom), family experience (e.g. safety, cost value), fan experience (e.g. atmosphere, seats), and food & drinks (e.g. quality, value).
Key highlights:
Camden Yards (Baltimore Orioles) and PNC Park (Pittsburgh Pirates) are the most praised ballpark in MLB, earning a perfect 100/100 contentment score
Oakland Coliseum (Oakland Athletics) ranks as the most complained-about stadium, scoring just 1/100, with heavy negative sentiment around facilities, fan experience, and food & drinks
Rogers Centre (Toronto Blue Jays) draws the most complaints in the food & drinks category
Dodger Stadium (Los Angeles Dodgers) has the highest family game-day cost at $322, while Kauffman Stadium (Kansas City Royals) is the cheapest at $123, giving fans far more bang for their buck
MLB ballparks fans grumble about most
#1 – Oakland Coliseum (Oakland Athletics), 1/100
If complaints were runs, Oakland Coliseum would be leading the league. Ranking last with a 1/100 contentment score, fans are consistently reporting negative experiences across facilities (1/100), fan experience (1/100), and food & drinks (4/100).
Its parking situation and food prices are among its biggest weaknesses, accounting for a significant share of complaints. Reviews frequently include words like “outdated”, “hard to navigate”, “empty”, and “not worth it”, pointing to aging infrastructure and limited amenities as recurring pain points.
#2 – Truist Park (Atlanta Braves), 31/100
Despite being a newer ballpark, Truist Park shows up as the #2 most complained about stadium. Fans point to issues with facilities (20/100) and overall fan experience (37/100), citing congestion, logistics, and inconsistent value for the price. The stadium’s reviews frequently reference “crowded”, “traffic”, “expensive”, and “hard to get in and out”.
While not catastrophic in any single category, the steady accumulation of complaints keeps Truist Park at the bottom of the list.
#3 – Rogers Centre (Toronto Blue Jays), 35/100
Rogers Centre proves that even a good “6ix” view can’t save a bad snack run. The stadium posts the lowest food & drinks score in MLB (1/100), with complaints centered on high prices and underwhelming concession quality.
Reviews frequently include words like “overpriced”, “bland”, “long lines”, and “not worth the cost” signaling frustration around value. The family experience score also trends below average, with fans noting that expenses add up quickly and the payoff doesn’t always match the price. When the hot dogs disappoint and the bill stings, the grumbling tends to follow.
#4 – Dodger Stadium (Los Angeles Dodgers), 38/100
Dodger Stadium proves that iconic games don’t always mean a smooth game-day experience. Fans regularly call out high prices and logistical headaches, with frequent mentions of “traffic”, “parking nightmare”, “long waits”, and “expensive”.
The ballpark also has the highest family experience cost in MLB ($322), further dragging down the overall sentiment. With premium prices layered on top of logistical frustrations, the experience can feel like a long haul before the first pitch is even thrown.
#5 – Yankee Stadium (New York Yankees), 51/100
Yankee Stadium delivers big-league atmosphere and big-league complaints. Fans frequently cite concerns around value, seating comfort, and food quality, with common review keywords including “overpriced,” “crowded”, “tight seating”, and “not what it used to be”.
While history and energy still shine through, reviews reflect that modern amenities and fan-friendly upgrades haven’t quiet kept pace with expectations.
MLB’s most praised ballparks
#1 – Camden Yards (Baltimore Orioles) and PNC Park (Pittsburgh Pirates), 100/100
Camden Yards and PNC Park tie as the most praised ballparks in MLB. Fan rave about the full game-day package: easy facilities, great views, and an atmosphere that actually lets baseball do the talking.
In the reviews, complaints are rare, and praise is the norm, with consistent keywords like “clean”, “easy to get around”, and “great experience”. These two parks deliver exactly what fans hope for when they buy a ticket.
#2 – Oracle Park (San Francisco Giants), 99/100
Oracle Park has the #2 highest fan contentment score in the league. Fans consistently use keywords like “views”, “clean”, “waterfront”, “easy to navigate”, and “great food” when reporting on their experience. The positive sentiments continue across facilities, fan experience, and food & drinks. At Oracle Park, the experience does most of the heavy lifting, no rally needed.
#3 – T-Mobile Park (Seattle Mariners), 96/100
T-Mobile Park shows what happens when a stadium is designed with fans in mind. Earning a 96/100 contentment score, it scores consistently high across facilities, fan experience, and comfort. Reviews frequently include keywords like “clean”, “modern”, “comfortable”, and “easy to navigate”, with relatively few complaints about congestion or amenities.
#4 – Kauffman Stadium (Kansas City Royals), 94/100
Kauffman Stadium is proof that a great ballpark doesn’t have to come with a premium price tag. Posting a 94/100 contentment score and the lowest family cost in MLB ($123), fans love the park’s laid-back feel and easygoing atmosphere. Reviews frequently mention “affordable”, “family-friendly”, and “relaxed”, making Kauffman the rare stadium where the bill doesn’t sting more than the loss.
#5 – Great American Ball Park (Cincinnati Reds), Progressive Field (Cleveland Guardians) & Coors Field (Colorado Rockies), 93/100
These three ballparks finish tied thanks to consistently strong fan sentiment and very few recurring complaints. Each earns a 93/100 contentment score, with reviews frequently mentioning keywords like “clean”, “easy to get around”, “great views”, and “good atmosphere”.
Fans praise Great American Ball Park for its straightforward, no-stress layout, Progressive Field for its comfortable fan experience, and Coors Field for its top-notch views.
Conclusion
No matter where you sit or who you’re rooting for, a day at the ballpark should feel rewarding. The best stadiums in these rankings show what happens when the basics are done right – a welcoming space, easy flow, fair value, and a genuinely good time – leaving fans with memories instead of complaints.
Methodology
To determine MLB’s most and least complained-about ballparks, we analyzed 130,000+ fan total reviews from Google Reviews, TripAdvisor, and Yelp across all 30 MLB stadiums.
Reviews were evaluated using sentiment analysis to identify positive and negative words related to the following four key game-day categories: facilities, family experience, fan experience, and food & drinks.
Facilities: Parking, public transit access, bathrooms, accessibility, staff interactions
Family experience: Cost perception, giveaways, security, family-friendly activities
Fan experience: Seat quality, sightlines, scoreboards, atmosphere
Food & beverage: Concession quality, variety, and value
Each stadium received sentiment scores in every category based on how frequently praise or complaints appeared in fan reviews.
These scores were then normalized and combined to create an overall contentment score, allowing us to rank ballparks relative to one another. Higher scores indicate more positive fan sentiment, while lower scores reflect a higher concentration of complaints.
Fair use
Feel free to use the data or visuals on this page for non-commercial purposes. Please be sure to include proper attribution linking back to this page to give credit to the authors.
For any press questions, please contact rhiannon.odonohoe[at]casino.org