Chicago signs Scott Kingery to a minor-league deal, a low-cost depth move aimed at versatility rather than headline impact.

The Chicago Cubs made a quietly interesting move on December 2nd, 2025, signing utility man Scott Kingery to a minor-league deal with an invitation to Spring Training. It is not an earth-shattering addition; it is very much a bargain-bin, let ’s-get-cute-with-it type of signing, but there is still some modest upside worth acknowledging.

Kingery once carried real prospect heat. He was a top talent in the Phillies system, he earned national attention, and he even secured an early career contract because Philadelphia believed he would be a long-term piece of their core. That projection never materialized. Injuries piled up, swing changes never truly settled, and inconsistency dragged him out of the big-league picture. Over the past few seasons, he has operated more as an organizational depth option, moving between Triple-A and brief major league stints without ever recapturing that early promise.

Why the Cubs Bother

Chicago is not signing Kingery to fix anything or to shake up the roster. This is about depth, competition, and exploring whether there is still something useful left in the profile. Kingery still runs well, he can handle multiple positions, and he brings a high-energy style of play that teams like having in camp. For a club that values versatility and roster flexibility, he fits the template of a low-risk player worth taking a chance on

Best-Case Scenario

The best version of this move is one where Kingery clicks with the Cubs’ hitting infrastructure, shows flashes of his earlier potential, and carves out a role as a super-utility bench piece. A player who can move around the diamond, handle spot starts and give Craig Counsell options without creating defensive liabilities and overall has real value over the course of a long season.

Story continues below.

More Sports News

.wp-block-group__inner-container:has(> .embla),
.wp-block-group:where(.alignfull) > .wp-block-group__inner-container:has(> .embla) {
width: calc(100vw – (var(–side-spacing) * 2)) !important;
}
.embla {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.embla__container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: nowrap;
gap: 0 !important;
width: 75%;
}
.embla__slide {
margin-inline-end: var(–column-gap);
}
.embla__arrow,
.embla__arrow:active,
.embla__arrow:target,
.embla__arrow:hover,
.embla__arrow:focus-visible {
display: none;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
line-height: 0;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.75);
color: var(–color-primary);
border-radius: 100vw;

svg {
width: 24px;
}
}
.embla__prev {
left: 0;
}
.embla__next {
right: 0;
}
]]>

Most Likely Scenario

The more realistic outcome is simpler. Kingery becomes solid Triple-A depth; he is available when injuries pop up, and he provides stable coverage across multiple positions. He may come up for short stretches or spend most of his time at Iowa, but he keeps the system insulated against the unexpected.

Bottom Line

This is not the type of signing that alters the NL Central picture, and it is not designed to do so. It is a low-risk, low-cost move where the Cubs take a look at a former top prospect and see if their environment can extract a little more from his skill set. It is a cute signing, a cheap signing, and ultimately a perfectly reasonable one for a team trying to strengthen the soft edges of the roster not one for a team looking to build themselves in the offseason.