{"id":7558,"date":"2025-05-07T09:23:18","date_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:23:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/7558\/"},"modified":"2025-05-07T09:23:18","modified_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:23:18","slug":"mlb-commissioner-several-owners-pressuring-stu-sternberg-to-sell-rays-as-buyers-eye-team","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/7558\/","title":{"rendered":"MLB commissioner, several owners pressuring Stu Sternberg to sell Rays as buyers eye team"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As he considers walking away from a stadium deal in St. Petersburg, Fla., <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6188869\/2025\/03\/12\/mlb-covid-2020-players\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tampa Bay Rays<\/a> owner Stu Sternberg is being pressured to sell his team by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6192259\/2025\/03\/11\/paul-skenes-baseball-celebrity-pirates\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">MLB<\/a> commissioner Rob Manfred and some other owners, people briefed on the ownership-level conversations who were not authorized to speak publicly told The Athletic.<\/p>\n<p>One of the groups interested in buying the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6186874\/2025\/03\/11\/mlb-fans-optimism-results-rankings\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Rays<\/a> is the family of Edward DeBartolo Jr., which has roots in Tampa, three people briefed on the discussions said. Members of the DeBartolo family own the San Francisco 49ers, although Edward Jr. is no longer involved with that team. Former New York Yankees minority owner Joe Molloy is involved in the DeBartolo effort as well, but does not carry the same financial weight as DeBartolo.<\/p>\n<p>The people briefed on the team\u2019s discussions also said Tampa businessman Dan Doyle Jr., who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/mikeozanian\/2023\/09\/21\/lead-investor-for-group-seeking-to-buy-tampa-bay-rays-drops-out\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">reportedly pulled out<\/a> of a previous process to buy the Rays in 2023, is part of another group with recent interest.<\/p>\n<p>MLB and the 49ers declined comment. Doyle and Molloy could not immediately be reached for comment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m interested to read about what industry partners have told you about our franchise and its future,\u201d Sternberg said when reached for comment Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>Sternberg has also been courting minority investors. If the team is sold, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6192242\/2025\/03\/12\/mlb-breakout-candidates-2025-brooks-lee-ivan-herrera-keith-law\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">MLB<\/a> ultimately wants the franchise to remain in Florida, with an eye on the Ybor City neighborhood near downtown Tampa if St. Petersburg does not work out. People briefed on the process pointed to Orlando as a possibility as well.<\/p>\n<p>But after <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6200970\/2025\/03\/13\/rays-stadium-st-petersburg-project-ends\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">17 years of trying to find a new stadium<\/a>, Sternberg appears to be on the clock to firm up a long-term plan, be it by selling or building. If he doesn\u2019t, he risks MLB trying to take away at least some of the team\u2019s revenue-sharing money in the future, people briefed on the ownership-level conversations said. The Rays receive around $60 million from that pool, people briefed on the team\u2019s finances said.<\/p>\n<p>Two key dates loom. The first is March 31, a deadline for Sternberg to meet several obligations that would push forward a $1.3 billion stadium deal in St. Pete. The Rays have been telegraphing that they are unlikely to meet those obligations, however, which would leave them on square one, or close to it: in search of a municipality in Florida that will agree to publicly fund some of a ballpark.<\/p>\n<p>The Rays planned to contribute $700 million to the stadium in St. Pete. But the team is arguing that a delayed county vote led to a holdup in construction and therefore, increased costs. They do not believe they should cover those costs on their own.<\/p>\n<p>The delayed vote came on the heels of hurricanes in the area last fall, including Hurricane Milton, which ripped up the roof of the Rays\u2019 home, Tropicana Field. Because of the damage to Tropicana, the Rays this year have to play at the New York Yankees\u2019 minor-league complex, and might have to go there again in 2026 as well.<\/p>\n<p>Chris Latvala, a commissioner in Florida\u2019s Pinellas County who has been a vocal critic of Sternberg, believes a sale is coming.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf Stu walks away from this deal, I think the owners and Major League Baseball will see that he either has an unwillingness to do a new stadium in Tampa Bay, or he has a financial issue that prevents him from doing a new stadium in Tampa Bay and there needs to be an ownership change,\u201d Latvala said. \u201cI do believe that we\u2019ll have new ownership with the Rays at some point in the near future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Team president Matt Silverman said Sternberg\u2019s access to the money is not the issue, however.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not a question of whether we have the funds. We do,\u201d Silverman said. \u201cThe question is whether it\u2019s a good use of those funds to commit us and MLB to this ballpark for the next 30 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A more powerful deadline, however, might loom at the end of 2026, during collective bargaining between MLB and the players\u2019 union. MLB and the Major League Baseball Players Association could, at that time, agree to ways to lessen the team\u2019s share in revenue sharing or put contingencies around it.<\/p>\n<p>The Rays, however, believe they should not be committing to a stadium project where they don\u2019t think they can thrive, people briefed on the possibility of the team\u2019s sale said. The Rays feel that fellow club owners should be glad the team does not want to sign up for 30 more years of middling success \u2014 because it would mean they\u2019d still be propped up by revenue sharing. The team also feels singled out compared to other smaller-market teams that have been less successful on the field, including in comparison to the Miami Marlins.<\/p>\n<p>But if Sternberg walks away from the deal in St. Pete at the end of the month, it might be difficult to revive.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t know what there would be left to negotiate,\u201d Latvala said. \u201cWe have a deal, and it\u2019s on the table. I\u2019m certainly not going to give them more money, so I don\u2019t really know what\u2019s left to negotiate with them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Construction in Tampa might only be more expensive, which could make it hard for the team to pivot there while he remains the owner. New investors in the team could change that dynamic, but it\u2019s unclear how Tampa politicians would receive Sternberg after this episode in St. Pete.<\/p>\n<p>Levers of power<\/p>\n<p>Next offseason, Manfred can exert some financial pressure on the Rays if he decides to lessen or eliminate their payments from two pots of money he controls: the commissioner\u2019s discretionary fund and the commissioner\u2019s supplemental discretionary fund. The league does not publicize those distributions, but the Rays have been a beneficiary, people briefed on that process said. Those payments are typically not huge \u2014 several million, rather than tens of millions, but they\u2019re not negligible either.<\/p>\n<p>The most powerful lever MLB has over the Rays, though, likely lies in the CBA. When it expires in December 2026, Manfred is poised to try to overhaul the sport\u2019s revenue-sharing system, and that might leave the Rays with less of other teams\u2019 money coming to them.<\/p>\n<p>Now, the players might rebuff large-scale change. Either way, the league and the union could agree to a special carve-out for the Rays that would limit their revenue-sharing funds if they do not get a new stadium deal in place by a certain date.<\/p>\n<p>In the current CBA, which covers 2022-26, the sides agreed to a provision that would have taken away revenue sharing from the Athletics had they not reached a binding stadium agreement by Jan. 15, 2024. The team met that deadline.<\/p>\n<p>The A\u2019s were a different case than the Rays, however. Oakland\u2019s market size typically would preclude a team there from getting revenue sharing at all. But the A\u2019s had a special allowance to receive it, and the Jan. 15, 2024 deadline served as an expiration date. In St. Pete, the Rays normally would receive money. But that doesn\u2019t mean MLB and the MLBPA couldn\u2019t tie their slice of the pie to a new stadium.<\/p>\n<p>In the big picture, the Rays find themselves staring down not only their local government, but also the league office and the sport\u2019s other owners.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s the rush?<\/p>\n<p>The Rays could probably sell for a higher dollar value were potential buyers allowed to relocate the team. But MLB does not want the Rays to move out of the overall market, believing it still viable. Nor does the league want to give up a potential expansion city like Nashville or Portland, Ore., or Salt Lake City. Whether to allow relocation is ultimately up to MLB and the other owners, not Sternberg.<\/p>\n<p>So with discussions not yet meeting Sternberg\u2019s target price, he doesn\u2019t appear to have had a great incentive to act quickly. Revenue sharing and the team\u2019s balance sheet today might be more appealing than reducing his asking price or taking on the expense of new construction in St. Pete.<\/p>\n<p>But Manfred and other owners appear out of patience. Sternberg a few years ago pushed a plan for the team to split the season between two countries: in the U.S. in Florida, and in Montreal in Canada, which Manfred eventually nixed.<\/p>\n<p>Today, large-market clubs that pay the most into revenue sharing are not happy, and at least some of the small-market teams are annoyed too.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019re San Diego, you\u2019re Milwaukee, you work your a\u2013 off,\u201d said one person briefed on the ownership-level discussions.<\/p>\n<p>To an extent, the Rays are keeping the owners from the windfall of an expansion fee.<\/p>\n<p>Manfred wants the league to have chosen two cities for new teams before his planned retirement in 2029, but he has also long said that the process would wait until the Rays\u2019 situation is solved. The Rays aren\u2019t definitively the only hold-up, though. Some owners might be hesitant to expand until the A\u2019s are settled in Las Vegas or the league has a plan for the Miami Marlins, who are struggling to draw.<\/p>\n<p>Forbes estimates the Rays to be worth $1.25 billion. Sternberg bought the team for $200 million in 2004.<\/p>\n<p>DeBartolo Jr. oversaw the 49ers\u2019 five-time Super Bowl-winning dynasty. He also received a presidential pardon from President Donald Trump following his involvement in the corruption case of former Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards. After DeBartolo Jr. was indicted for failing to report an extortion attempt by the former Louisiana governor, the NFL suspended him for one year and he later ceded control of the 49ers to his sister, Denise DeBartolo York, in 2000.<\/p>\n<p>Molloy ran the New York Yankees when George Steinbrenner was suspended in the early 1990s. He was previously married to the daughter of the late Yankees owner, and had reported interest in buying the Marlins in 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Doyle Jr. and his father started the office technology company DEX Imaging in 2002. They sold it to Staples in 2019 before buying it back in 2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">(Top photo of Sternberg: Chris O\u2019Meara \/ Associated Press)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"As he considers walking away from a stadium deal in St. Petersburg, Fla., Tampa Bay Rays owner Stu&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7559,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2377],"tags":[5,4,297,1304,165,2550,68,2551,2549],"class_list":{"0":"post-7558","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tampa-bay-rays","8":"tag-baseball","9":"tag-mlb","10":"tag-rays","11":"tag-san-francisco-49ers","12":"tag-sports-business","13":"tag-tampa-bay","14":"tag-tampa-bay-rays","15":"tag-tampabay","16":"tag-tampabayrays"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/channels.im\/@mlb\/114465826599136229","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7558\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/mlb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}