The 2025-26 Big Ten basketball season continues to draw closer. An important offseason milestone passed late last month: Early-entry NBA draft candidates had their deadline to either remain in the draft or return to college. The passing of that date, plus the conclusion of the recent transfer portal entry cycle, mostly finalizes each team’s roster for the 2025-26 campaign.

Notable players to initially declare for the draft before returning to Big Ten programs include Wisconsin’s John Blackwell, Michigan’s Yaxel Lendeborg (via UAB) and Oregon‘s Nate Bittle. That trio guarantees to play into the 2025-26 Big Ten race, as each of their respective teams projects among the conference’s top eight. Lendeborg may headline that list, joining a projected top-ranked Michigan team as the No. 1 player in the transfer portal, but Blackwell and Bittle shouldn’t be forgotten in that equation. The latter two each enter 2025-26 with first-team All-Conference expectations, Blackwell as a top scoring option and Bittle as arguably the Big Ten’s most impactful defender.

With that trio back in college, as well as several others, CBS Sports’ Jon Rothstein recently posted the Big Ten’s updated returning scoring numbers for the 2025-26 season. As is also the case on the gridiron, returning production can be a strong indicator of future success. Therefore, it’s no surprise that several basketball programs with more than 50% of their 2024-25 scoring back in the lineup have sky-high expectations entering 2025-26.

While the prevalence of the transfer portal complicates the longstanding relationship between returning scoring and future success, the stat can’t be denied in the larger picture of preseason projections. Here are Rothstein’s returning scoring numbers for every Big Ten team entering 2025-26.

Returning Scoring: 0%

2024-25 Record: 27-9 (14-6 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 10

Maryland is not alone in this bottom spot. Practically its entire roster turned over in a matter of months. New coach Buzz Williams did well in the portal, landing Myles Rice (Indiana), Pharrel Payne (Texas A&M), Solomon Washington (Texas A&M) and Isaiah Watts (Washington State) among others. Maryland had nearly its entire production come from its starting five last season (64.7 of its 81.1 points per game). All five of those players are now elsewhere, whether in college or preparing for the NBA draft.

T17. Indiana Hoosiers

Returning Scoring: 0%

2024-25 Record: 19-13 (10-10 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 12

Indiana endured a top-down turnover before and after Darian DeVries’ hire. Tucker DeVries (West Virginia), Reed Bailey (Davidson) and Lamar Wilkerson (Sam Houston) highlight a transfer class that will carry a significant load next season. Anything more than a low-seed NCAA Tournament bid would be surprising.

16. Iowa Hawkeyes

Returning Scoring: 1.7%

2024-25 Record: 17-16 (7-13 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 11

Unsurprisingly, all of the programs that underwent offseason coaching changes are at the bottom of this list. Iowa had nearly its entire team depart after Fran McCaffery’s firing. New coach Ben McCollum brings immediate expectations of success, driven largely by five-star transfer and all-conference candidate Bennett Stirtz (Drake). Still, an entirely new-look lineup would do well to enter the conference’s top half.

Get more (Iowa) news, analysis and opinions on Hawkeyes Wire

15. USC Trojans

Returning Scoring: 2.9%

2024-25 Record: 17-18 (7-13 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 9

There is a train of thought that sometimes, a small amount of returning production is a good thing. That thought resonates after USC went 17-18 in 2024-25 in Eric Musselman’s first year. Rodney Rice (transfer, Maryland), Chad Baker-Mazara (transfer, Auburn), Alijah Arenas (high school), Ezra Ausar (transfer, Utah) and Jacob Cofie (transfer, Virginia) headline an impressive offseason of recruiting. No one should be surprised if USC starts to turn it around this season.

Get more (USC) news, analysis and opinions on Trojans Wire

14. Minnesota Golden Gophers

Returning Scoring: 8.2%

2024-25 Record: 15-17 (7-13 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 15

Minnesota is the fourth team on this list that made a coaching change after last season. New coach Niko Medved will have his hands full in Year 1. Not only does Minnesota return less than 10% of its scoring from last season, but the program has proven one of the toughest places in the conference to consistently win.

13. Rutgers Scarlet Knights

Returning Scoring: 14.4%

2024-25 Record: 15-17 (8-12 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 17

Rutgers’ low returning scoring total of 14.4% is better viewed within the context that two of its top departing players, Dylan Harper (19.4 points per game) and Ace Bailey (17.6 points per game), are poised to be the No. 2 and No. 3 picks in the NBA draft, respectively. Their combined 37 points per game last season made up 48% of Rutgers’ scoring. The team is likely to finish in the bottom tier of the conference with those two gone.

12. Penn State Nittany Lions

Returning Scoring: 14.6%

2024-25 Record: 16-15 (6-14 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 18

Penn State was one of the biggest losers of the early entry decision deadline. Rising star center Yanic Konan Niederhauser elected to remain in the draft. The 7-foot center averaged 12.9 points, 6.3 rebounds and 2.3 blocks (best in the Big Ten) last year. He would’ve been a top candidate for conference Defensive Player of the Year had he returned.

Get more (Penn State) news, analysis and opinions on Nittany Lions Wire

11. Washington Huskies

Returning Scoring: 19.8%

2024-25 Record: 13-18 (4-16 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 16

Washington fans will expect a big step forward in Year 2 under Danny Sprinkle after the team went 13-18 overall and 4-16 in Big Ten play last season, finishing dead last in the conference standings. The departure of senior forward Great Osobor (14.8 points, 8 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game) doesn’t help. The late-cycle addition of former USC guard Desmond Claude (15.8 points, 3.5 rebounds and 4.2 assists per game) will play a major role in the team’s success.

Get more (Washington) news, analysis and opinions on Huskies Wire

10. Wisconsin Badgers

Returning Scoring: 35.9%

2024-25 Record: 27-10 (13-7 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 4

John Blackwell (15.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, 2.2 assists per game) and Nolan Winter (9.4 points, 5.8 rebounds per game) are Wisconsin’s top returning contributors. Both will be critical to the team’s success. However, the program lost a loaded senior class after the 2024-25 season, including All-American wing John Tonje, starting guard Max Klesmit, standout center Steven Crowl and top bench contributors Kamari McGee and Carter Gilmore. The program’s impressive transfer class of Andrew Rohde (Virginia), Austin Rapp (Portland), Nick Boyd (San Diego State) and Braeden Carrington (Tulsa) combined with likely progression from Blackwell and Winter are primary reasons the team is projected to finish within the Big Ten’s top four,

9. Michigan Wolverines

Returning Scoring: 40.1%

2024-25 Record: 27-10 (14-6 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 2

Michigan lost its top two players: Vlad Goldin (16.6 points, seven rebounds per game) and Danny Wolf (13.2 points, 9.7 rebounds, 3.6 assists per game). It landed a top transfer class of Lendeborg, center Aday Mara (UCLA), forward Morez Johnson (Illinois) and Elliot Cadeau (North Carolina). That group, plus returning contributors Roddy Gayle Jr. (9.8 points, 3.4 rebounds, 2.2 assists per game) and Nimari Burnett (9.4 points, 3.5 rebounds, 1.5 assists per game), has the Wolverines projected as a top-five team.

Get more (Michigan) news, analysis and opinions on Wolverines Wire

8. Michigan State Spartans

Returning Scoring: 40.4%

2024-25 Record: 30-7 (17-3 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 5

Michigan State loses notable players Jase Richardson (NBA draft), Jaden Akins (graduation), Frankie Fidler (graduation), Szymon Zapala (graduation) and Tre Holloman (portal) after winning the Big Ten last season. Their departures shouldn’t raise much concern. Tom Izzo has a proven ability to reload his roster year-to-year. The Spartans always seem to be in the mix atop the conference standings.

Get more (Michigan State) news, analysis and opinions on Spartans Wire

7. Northwestern Wildcats

Returning Scoring: 47.2%

2024-25 Record: 17-16 (7-13 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 13

Northwestern returns a bulk of its scoring. All-Big Ten forward Nick Martinelli’s 20.5 points per game accounted for nearly 30% of the team’s 72.4 points per game last season. Standout guards Brooks Barnhizer, Ty Berry and Jalen Leach plus forward Matthew Nicholson were lost to graduation. It wouldn’t be surprising if Martinelli scored 35% of the team’s points this season.

6. Oregon Ducks

Returning Scoring: 48%

2024-25 Record: 25-10 (12-8 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 8

Bittle’s return is major news for an Oregon team that was night-and-day better with him in the lineup last season. The Ducks also return starting point guard Jackson Shelstad (13.7 points per game), who, with Bittle, forms one of the conference’s better leading duos. They would do extremely well to lead Oregon to another 25-win season. The team doesn’t project to have the requisite depth to contend for a conference title.

Get more (Oregon) news, analysis and opinions on Ducks Wire

5. Nebraska Cornhuskers

Returning Scoring: 48.1%

2024-25 Record: 21-14 (7-13 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 14

Nebraska lost leading scorers Brice Williams (20.4 points per game) and Juwan Gary (14.6 points per game) after the 2024-25 season. It returns third-leading scorer Connor Essegian (10.7 points per game) and 2023-24 standout center Rienk Mask (12.3 points, 7.5 rebounds, three assists per game in 2023-24). The team still has major question marks after its collapse to close the 2024-25 campaign.

Get more (Nebraska) news, analysis and opinions on Cornhuskers Wire

4. Illinois Fighting Illini

Returning Scoring: 52.1%

2024-25 Record: 22-13 (12-8 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 6

Illinois lost top-end freshman contributors Kasparas Jakucionis and Will Riley to the NBA draft and Morez Johnson Jr. to the transfer portal. However, it still returns more than 50% of its scoring from last season and welcomes in Cal transfer Andrej Stojakovic (17.9 points per game) and Arkansas transfer Zvonimir Ivisic (8.5 points, 4.3 rebounds per game). Brad Underwood has cemented his team’s position near the top of the Big Ten standings, regardless of its year-to-year continuity.

3. UCLA Bruins

Returning Scoring: 55.5%

2024-25 Record: 23-11 (13-7 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 3

UCLA will have legitimate Final Four aspirations entering 2025-26. The team returns more than 55% of its scoring, plus welcomes in top transfer point guard Donovan Dent (20.4 points per game at New Mexico in 2024-25). The team’s question may come in the frontcourt, where Mara transferred to conference rival Michigan.

Get more (UCLA) news, analysis and opinions on UCLA Wire

2. Ohio State Buckeyes

Returning Scoring: 59%

2024-25 Record: 17-15 (9-11 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 7

All-conference guard Bruce Thornton (17.7 points, 3.4 rebounds, 4.6 assists per game) headlines the Buckeyes’ strong returning cast. The 2024-25 team appeared much better than its final 17-15 record shows. Fans will enter 2025-26 hoping for further development from Thornton and, more importantly, better results in close games.

Get more (Ohio State) news, analysis and opinions on Buckeyes Wire

1. Purdue Boilermakers

Returning Scoring: 86%

2024-25 Record: 24-12 (13-7 Big Ten)

Badgers Wire Power Ranking: No. 1

Purdue’s returning production is staggering. It’s a primary reason the team is likely to enter the season ranked No. 1 in the AP Poll. All-American guard Braden Smith (15.8 points, 4.5 rebounds, 8.7 assists and 2.2 steals per game) and all-conference forward Trey Kaufman-Renn (20.1 points, 6.5 rebounds, 2.2 assists per game) lead the Boilermakers’ returning group. They’ll enter the year as the Big Ten’s clear top two players.

Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion