{"id":607526,"date":"2026-02-17T05:01:00","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T05:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/607526\/"},"modified":"2026-02-17T05:01:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T05:01:00","slug":"why-the-nba-doesnt-just-copy-the-nfls-local-broadcast-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/607526\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the NBA Doesn\u2019t Just Copy the NFL\u2019s Local Broadcast System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">When it comes to American sports leagues, nobody is as successful at monetizing broadcasts, team identity, and their sport itself as the National Football League. The NBA has made great strides in recent years, but they\u2019re still looking up at the NFL and the gap isn\u2019t close.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Not coincidentally, the NFL also has the most lucrative and balanced broadcast revenue stream in the industry. That\u2019s causing one Blazer\u2019s Edge Reader to ask whether the NBA couldn\u2019t imitate them, to the benefit of smaller-market franchises.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The discussion on changing the draft reminded me that I\u2019ve often wondered why the NFL is a much more \u201cbalanced\u201d league in which even small market teams have a more-or-less equal chance to be just as competitive as large market teams. Now that the NBA has multiple cameras in every arena for recording and analyzing games as well as a \u201cleague pass\u201d program to see games, why can\u2019t the league take responsibility for televising all games and share the revenue equally among the teams? I think that how the NFL keeps the revenue similar for all teams in the league so they can compete on a more-or-less level playing field.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">It\u2019s a fair question, but there are several obstacles to what you\u2019re suggesting. Caveat that I\u2019m not anywhere close to an expert on these things. Readers may end up augmenting this response in the comment section. I suggest you read there too as it populates.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The first step in nationalizing revenues from NBA broadcasts would be to actually get those games broadcast. That\u2019s a far bigger problem in basketball than it is in football. Football has 32 franchises, each playing one game a week. Allowing for byes, that\u2019s\u2026what? 13-14 games each week? Most of those occur on Sunday afternoon, with some on Monday and Thursday, but it\u2019s contained. Divided between member networks, a broadcast partner might be devoting between 6-12 hours per week to the sport.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The NBA has 30 franchises, each playing 3-4 games a week. That\u2019s 50 games or more. At 2.5 hours per game\u2014the minimum you\u2019d need\u2014that would be 125 hours of programming to account for, running every evening across multiple time zones, on weekend afternoons too.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Current NBA broadcast partners are fine televising a limited number of games during targeted hours, just like NFL broadcasters do. Zero of the major broadcasters would want to devote four times that amount of airtime to NBA games, especially when a large number of those include teams from Utah, Charlotte, Portland, and the like. The commitment would be enormous. The ratings wouldn\u2019t hold up. They\u2019d never sell enough ad time to justify the endeavor, meaning they couldn\u2019t pay the NBA enough to make it worth it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">To get this plan to work, the league would have to find a single, subscription-dependent streaming outlet (think Amazon or Netflix) to host games over a few dedicated channels. These outlets are more willing to absorb loss than actual networks. The holes in the plan are obvious:<\/p>\n<p>The NBA would be dependent on broadcast rights from that source to replace current local revenue from all 30 franchises. In fact the rights would need to exceed current revenue substantially, otherwise why would they make the change?The new cost would also include camera crews, production staff, broadcast trucks, on-air talent, and the like which are now paid for by local franchises and\/or outlets. That\u2019s not just a financial nightmare, but a logistical one. Nightly travel for everyone, enough crews to cover 11 games in a single day\u2026ugh.The NBA would have to inform the same broadcast partner that\u2019s paying a MINT for the rights (and financing all the broadcast crews) that other national rights-holders have first dibs on the best games, per their existing contracts. That\u2019s a hard sell\u2026like telling someone they can buy your entire 1984 basketball card set except the Michael Jordan rookie. Oh, and they have to display those other cards in their storefront window.The product, in the end, would look exactly like what League Pass looks like now. Except League Pass just piggybacks on the local broadcasts already in place. It doesn\u2019t incur costs by adding to them or replacing them. Since this service already exists for people who are interested enough in basketball to buy it, the league is theoretically getting the revenue anyway, right now. There would be little reason for the NBA or any streaming service buying the rights to NBA games to assume that they could increase the national revenue stream enough to justify the costs and risks. It\u2019d be like a grocery store saying, \u201cWe\u2019re going to divert shoppers away from Checkstand 3 and make them buy their groceries through Checkstand 6 instead!\u201d All you did is shift the lineup to a different place. You didn\u2019t get more people to buy more product.The people you would get more revenue from is local consumers who want to see their team. The problem is, a huge number of those patrons are getting games for free now, either via over-air channels or part of their satellite\/cable\/streaming subscription. People in outlying areas have to pay extra, but in the team\u2019s city itself, games are easy to access at cheap or at no cost. Now you\u2019re charging them $100 or more a year for the same service via a different source. Most of them won\u2019t pay. That means team viewership will go down the drain, threatening the integrity of the league itself. The money the league and its teams got from new, local subscribers wouldn\u2019t offset the damage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Summarizing: The NBA couldn\u2019t sell that many games to broadcast partners. Any new broadcast partner would be taking on a cost they probably couldn\u2019t recoup. They\u2019d be taking on significant technical challenges. They\u2019d also be getting 95% of the \u201chind end\u201d of the product and very little of the cream on top. As a result, there\u2019s no way they could pay the NBA enough to justify the switch from the current system. On top of that, 95% of the NBA\u2019s fanbase would get screwed by the shift and a large portion of them would simply stop watching.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">We also have to consider ad revenue. The league has a few national sponsors\u2026the kind that get their names appended to All-Star Weekend events. But a good part of the revenue for broadcasts comes from local sources particular to each franchise.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Would the NBA or its broadcast-rights partners try to seek out even more national partners to fund this new system? If so, how many corporations with ultra-deep pockets and a need for name recognition via basketball are out there? Would the current national partners worry about their participation being diluted by this new influx?<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">If you try to maintain local connections, how does that happen? Nationalizing broadcasts means no local faces (including sales staffs and interpersonal relationships) anymore. How does a sales crew from New York even know to contact Localyokel Appliance in Gresham, Oregon? If they get the lead, how do they pursue it? We\u2019re talking a whole new corporate department paid for by somebody, one far less in touch and effective than these teams currently have.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">On top of that, why should Localyokel Appliance pay the same amount of money to reach a limited pool of subscribers to this new, non-area-specific network that they once did to reach literally everybody in their local area who tuned into the game?<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">If that weren\u2019t enough, it\u2019s an ill-kept secret that the league\u2019s marquee and\/or big-market franchises do very well with their local broadcast rights. That\u2019s part of why those teams sell for $7 billion while the others only go for $4 billion or so. Having that taken away and redistributed by any means is going to cause a revolt among those franchise owners.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">For all these reasons, adopting the NFL system of broadcast rights and revenue sharing is likely a non-starter. Since the NBA has just signed a multi-billion dollar national rights deal, I doubt that redoing the system is even on their radar. This league has 99 problems, but monetizing TV coverage ain\u2019t one.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Thanks for the question! You can send yours to blazersub@gmail.com and we\u2019ll try to answer as many as possible!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"When it comes to American sports leagues, nobody is as successful at monetizing broadcasts, team identity, and their&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":607527,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3784],"tags":[7,601,37787,6,687,471,3967,1617],"class_list":{"0":"post-607526","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-portland-trail-blazers","8":"tag-basketball","9":"tag-blazers","10":"tag-blazers-analysis","11":"tag-nba","12":"tag-portland","13":"tag-portland-trail-blazers","14":"tag-portlandtrailblazers","15":"tag-trail-blazers"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/channels.im\/@nba\/116084215330155767","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/607526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=607526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/607526\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/607527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=607526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=607526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=607526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}