{"id":695831,"date":"2026-04-03T13:19:06","date_gmt":"2026-04-03T13:19:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/695831\/"},"modified":"2026-04-03T13:19:06","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T13:19:06","slug":"the-nbas-anti-tanking-plans-and-how-they-affect-the-mavs-part-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/695831\/","title":{"rendered":"The NBA\u2019s anti-tanking plans and how they affect the Mavs \u2013 Part III"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Welcome to Part III of a four-part series taking a look at the proposed changes to the NBA Draft Lottery that are being put before the Board of Governors to prevent tanking. If you\u2019d like to catch up, check out <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mavsmoneyball.com\/e\/57389\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Part I<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mavsmoneyball.com\/e\/57395\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Part II<\/a>. Before we take a look at the second proposal, it\u2019s important to reiterate the current draft rules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">As it stands, the 14 teams that do not make the Playoffs are eligible for the lottery. Don\u2019t confuse making the Play In Tournament with making the Playoffs \u2013 they are not the same. 16 teams make the Playoffs when all is said and done, with 14 heading to the lottery. Lottery odds are flat (14%) for the three worst teams, with the odds decreasing from there down to the 14th worst team (0.5%). The team with the worst record can receive no worse than the 5th pick, as the lottery only determines picks 1-4 with the rest of the draft order following inversely of a team\u2019s record.<\/p>\n<p>Option 2 \u2013 increase the number of lottery teams significantly, draft position based on record across two seasons<\/p>\n<p>Key aspects of the proposal include:<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">If we thought the first proposal was a no-nonsense bid by the NBA, this proposal is truly next level. This scenario leaves only eight teams in the league outside the lottery. With the four first round losers entering the mix, there is plenty of room for insanity to ensue.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Since 1984 when the Playoffs expanded to 16 teams, there have been six 1 seeds to lose to the 8 seed in the first round of the Playoffs. The Seattle Sonics (1994), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nba.com\/heat\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Miami Heat<\/a> (1999), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mavsmoneyball.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mavericks<\/a> (2007), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.poundingtherock.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">San Antonio Spurs<\/a> (2011), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nba.com\/bulls\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Chicago Bulls<\/a> (2012) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brewhoop.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Milwaukee Bucks<\/a> (2023) all hold the dubious distinction. It is rare, but happens. This proposal means the best team in the league could possibly secure the 1 pick in the NBA Draft. Imagine the Thunder adding a Darryn Peterson or Cam Boozer because of one flukey Playoff loss. Highly unlikely, but when it happens, all but a single fanbase is going to be grabbing their pitchforks and torches.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The two-season lookback also adds potential chaos. Let\u2019s use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nba.com\/pacers\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Indiana Pacers<\/a> as an example. In 2024-25, they won 50 games and took a trip to the NBA Finals. In 2025-26, they are on pace to win 18 games, largely due to the season-long absence of Tyrese Haliburton. That would put them at an average of 34 wins under this proposal, greatly increasing their chances of a higher pick despite being an otherwise elite team. On the other hand, the Mavericks were a 50-win Finals team in 2023-24 before imploding their franchise with one of the most notorious trades in sports history. Both teams would have their draft odds skewed in the wrong direction based largely on anomalous occurrences.<\/p>\n<p>What it could mean for the Mavericks<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Chaos is difficult to predict, and this scenario at least invites chaos, however unlikely it may be. The two-season lookback doesn\u2019t strike me as doing the Mavericks or any other team any real favors. I actually think the overall proposal could encourage tanking. Case in point: the Pacers are doing it right now and they don\u2019t even have the incentive this proposal affords teams. If a good team gets some bad injury luck, they are highly incentivized to completely tank the following season to better their draft odds. Add in a win floor and teams will simply use that number of wins as their tank-target.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">My best guess is that Dallas ought to hope this proposal isn\u2019t the winner. The Mavs likely won\u2019t have control of their own pick (after this offseason) until 2031. Following up a few years of no pick control with a much wider field of lottery teams could really send Dallas on a long walk of poor draft outcomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">I invite you to follow me <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/_80MPH\" rel=\"nofollow\">@_80MPH<\/a> on X, and check back often at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mavsmoneyball.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mavs Moneyball<\/a> for all the latest on the Dallas Mavericks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Welcome to Part III of a four-part series taking a look at the proposed changes to the NBA&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":695832,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3793],"tags":[7,686,149,4057,166,42852,6],"class_list":{"0":"post-695831","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-dallas-mavericks","8":"tag-basketball","9":"tag-dallas","10":"tag-dallas-mavericks","11":"tag-dallasmavericks","12":"tag-mavericks","13":"tag-mavericks-draft","14":"tag-nba"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/695831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=695831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/695831\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/695832"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=695831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=695831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nba\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=695831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}