{"id":349037,"date":"2025-09-07T13:34:27","date_gmt":"2025-09-07T13:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/349037\/"},"modified":"2025-09-07T13:34:27","modified_gmt":"2025-09-07T13:34:27","slug":"offseason-in-review-cleveland-browns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/349037\/","title":{"rendered":"Offseason In Review: Cleveland Browns"},"content":{"rendered":"

It had been a while since the Browns had felt the lows felt in 2024. Since Cleveland drafted Baker Mayfield<\/a> No. 1 overall in 2018, the team had either hovered around .500 or made the playoffs in every season. After one such playoff berth in 2023, an effort at back-to-back winning seasons for the first time since 1988 and \u201989 produced a 3-14 campaign brought Cleveland crashing back to Earth. Continued struggles and injury issues for Deshaun Watson<\/a> and a trio of backup quarterbacks resulted in the league\u2019s lowest-scoring offense and lowest win total.<\/p>\n

Kevin Stefanski hasn\u2019t, somehow shockingly, become the NFL\u2019s ninth-longest-tenured<\/a> head coach for no reason, though. Following a season of turmoil, change was a certainty. So many contradictory headlines flew out of Cleveland this offseason concerning so many different, important decisions \u2014 such as the future of the team\u2019s defensive MVP or its four-way battle under center \u2014 that anything became possible. Fans won\u2019t end up caring much about how many statements general manager Andrew Berry and Co. walked back, as long as the moves made this offseason lay a path forward for success.<\/p>\n

Extensions and restructures:<\/p>\n

Closing in on the final weeks of the franchise\u2019s worst season since the winless 2017, one of several large stories in Cleveland\u2019s offseason began as the team\u2019s defensive star questioned the its long-term plan<\/a>. Seeking answers from the top brass on how they would dig themselves out of this hole, Garrett dangled the threat of a trade request that would set the stage for the two-month saga.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Berry tried to calm the waters, assuring fans he had no plans on trading the former No. 1 overall pick and that his expectations were for Garrett to eventually retire a Brown<\/a>. A conversation between the two seemed to build some goodwill, with Garrett coming away from the meeting posing the issue of how they might best capitalize on all the talent surrounding him on the team right then.<\/p>\n

Part of Garrett\u2019s concern also centered on him having outplayed the five-year, $125MM contract he had signed in 2020. The threat of a trade request began to shift from concern for team success to concern for a new contract. With two years remaining on the four-time first-team All-Pro\u2019s deal, Berry had to judiciously tell the media something was in the works without promising a new contract, at the same time continuing to assure fans that he did not intend to trade<\/a> Garrett.<\/p>\n

At that point, Garrett abandoned any pretense about team success and requested a trade<\/a>, asserting that an aggressive offseason from the front office would no longer do anything to quell his trade interest. Not a day later, teams were calling. Offers including more than a first-round pick<\/a> were rumored as part of a would-be blockbuster.<\/p>\n

Realizing Josh Sweat<\/a> was likely to price himself out of Philadelphia, the reigning champs had Garrett on their radar<\/a>. While the Eagles\u2019 interest was very real<\/a>, Buffalo, too, was having visions of pairing Garrett<\/a> with young pass rusher Greg Rousseau<\/a> as an upgrade over an aging Von Miller<\/a>. But the Browns did not relent on their intent to retain the future Hall of Fame edge rusher.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Garrett consulted with basketball star<\/a> LeBron James \u2014 someone quite famous for his own dramatic departure from Cleveland \u2014 and saw teammate Denzel Ward<\/a> throw in his support with a similar questioning of his own future with the team. Cleveland\u2019s front office was scrambling to figure out an offer<\/a>, but Garrett had landed on a decision that he was no longer open<\/a> to an extension.<\/p>\n

Multiple executives from around the league became convinced that the drama had to end in a trade<\/a>, but at the Combine \u2014 a popular place for team decision-makers to have unofficial conversations \u2014 no negotiations were entertained<\/a> by Cleveland. In fact, when Garrett requested to meet with Jimmy Haslam to facilitate a change of scenery, the 71-year-old owner declined the meeting<\/a>, seemingly putting the saga at an impasse.<\/p>\n

If one thing can help someone forget all the reasons they said they wanted to leave, though, it\u2019s a four-year, $160MM extension with $123.5MM guaranteed in total. It\u2019s unclear how discussions continued, how the offer was delivered, what the Browns promised they would do to change the outlook of their franchise; regardless, Garrett insists that his eyes were opened, his confidence in the team\u2019s plan had changed for the better, and it had nothing to do with money<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Speaking of money, despite holding an NFL second-best $41.95MM of salary cap carryover<\/a> from 2024 and seeing yet another large salary cap increase<\/a>, Cleveland entered the offseason $30.17MM over the cap for 2025. The figure was the second-worst in the league, with only the perpetually cap-strapped Saints in bigger trouble. The Browns had a few options to get to a better area cap-wise; again reducing an albatross cap number became the most obvious place to start.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Watson had suffered a setback<\/a> on his road to recovery from a torn Achilles, as a second tear<\/a> of that tendon occurred. The Browns went to the Watson restructure well again, continuing to lower record-setting cap hits on the QB\u2019s fully guaranteed deal. This one converted $44.7MM of base salary into a signing bonus and added a third void year to the end of his contract. Even after taking $36.8MM off his cap hit, Watson\u2019s $35.97MM figure in 2025 sits as the 12th-highest in the NFL.<\/p>\n

The Browns also put in an insurance claim that could net a further credit to their cap sheet<\/a> based on the injuries occurring within a time frame set up in a contractual addendum; they received credit off a $13.9MM portion<\/a> of Watson\u2019s salary in 2024, and the credit for 2025 would be based off a portion of Watson\u2019s original $46MM salary for the year.<\/p>\n

An additional $7MM of cap relief came from allowing Conklin to reach free agency at the end of this season, a year earlier than intended. Conklin\u2019s reworked agreement gave him a $10MM 2025 salary with $9MM guaranteed. $2MM of potential incentives could slightly take away from his cap relief, retroactively.<\/p>\n

The Browns\u2019 longest-tenured player, Bitonio decided to play<\/a> another season after briefly considering retirement. The 12th-year guard signed a restructured deal that converted a $3MM roster bonus into a signing bonus and added $600K to each of the four void years following the expiration of his contract.<\/p>\n

Notable losses:<\/p>\n

Jordan Akins<\/a>, TE
\nNick Chubb<\/a>, RB
\nMichael Dunn<\/a>, OL
\nMike Ford<\/a>, CB
\nD\u2019Onta Foreman<\/a>, RB
\nNick Harris<\/a>, C
\nJordan Hicks<\/a>, LB (retired<\/a>)
\nJames Hudson<\/a>, T
\nCharley Hughlett<\/a>, LS (released<\/a>)
\nGermain Ifedi<\/a>, T
\nRodney McLeod<\/a>, S
\nElijah Moore<\/a>, WR
\nOgbo Okoronkwo<\/a>, DE (released<\/a>)
\nJames Proche<\/a>, WR
\nJuan Thornhill<\/a>, S (post-June 1 cut<\/a>)
\nDalvin Tomlinson<\/a>, DT (post-June 1 cut<\/a>)
\nJedrick Wills<\/a>, T
\nJameis Winston<\/a>, QB
\nBailey Zappe<\/a>, QB<\/p>\n

Another way the Browns figured they could shed some unwanted cap hits was with a series of strategic cuts. By designating the releases of Thornhill and Tomlinson as post-June 1 cuts, the team was able to open up nearly $10MM of cap space. Thornhill was set to hold a $5.68MM charge on the books; his release provided the team with $3.4MM of relief. Tomlinson would have represented $17.15MM in dead cap had he been released without the designation; with it, the team saved $6.41MM of cap space.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Similarly, the release of Okoronkwo resulted in $3.67MM of cap savings, while a heartfelt goodbye to Hughlett opened up $1.08MM more. The Browns had tried shopping Okoronkwo in an attempt at cap relief and perhaps a bit of compensation in return, but the 30-year-old had already been designated as a cut candidate \u2014 alongside defensive tackle Shelby Harris<\/a>, who remained on the team in lieu of $1.68MM of cap relief \u2014 and ended up being cut as expected.<\/p>\n

Part of the solution to the team\u2019s quarterback issues in 2024, Winston expressed desires of re-signing. With hopes of creating a better quarterback situation for the future, the Browns opted not to pursue another contract with Winston.<\/p>\n

Chubb, too, expressed a desire to stay<\/a> in Cleveland in the early days of the offseason, but there were no immediate plans<\/a> for the team to re-sign the four-time Pro Bowler. By May, Chubb remained unsigned, and though Berry wouldn\u2019t rule anything out, there was still little likelihood that Chubb would end up with a new Browns contract. In the days before the draft, there were a few internal discussions<\/a> about a possible return, but a decision was clearly made that resulted, instead, in the team drafting two rookie backs.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The loss of Moore is an interesting one because the Browns placed a UFA tender<\/a> on him before he signed a deal with the Bills<\/a>. Buffalo swooped in in plenty of time to prevent Cleveland from getting exclusive negotiating rights, but the Browns will now await some level of compensatory draft pick compensation depending on how Moore performs in 2025. Everybody ends up a winner here as the Browns get their pick, Moore\u2019s potential earnings of $5MM end up being more than his tendered salary of $3.43MM would\u2019ve been, and the Bills add another weapon for reigning MVP Josh Allen<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Wills\u2019 tenure with the Browns ended in a bit of a whimper. The No. 10 overall pick for the team in 2020, the hopeful left tackle of the future had missed 21 games over the past two seasons as injuries began to define his career. With news that he will continue to miss time into the 2025 season<\/a>, the Browns have moved on, but other teams appear to have shown interest.<\/p>\n

Free agency additions:<\/p>\n

Maliek Collins<\/a>, DT: Two years, $20MM ($13MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nJoe Tryon-Shoyinka<\/a>, DE: One year, $4.76MM ($3.48MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nCornelius Lucas<\/a>, T: Two years, $6.5MM ($3.26MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nJoe Flacco<\/a>, QB: One year, $4.25MM ($3MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nTeven Jenkins<\/a>, OL: One year, $3.05MM ($2.67MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nRayshawn Jenkins<\/a>, S: One year, $1.42MM ($1.17MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nDamontae Kazee<\/a>, S: One year, $1.42MM ($1MM guaranteed<\/a>)
\nDeAndre Carter<\/a>, WR: One year, $1.42MM ($768K guaranteed<\/a>)
\nJerome Baker<\/a>, LB: One year, $1.42MM ($718K guaranteed<\/a>)
\nJulian Okwara<\/a>, LB: Practice squad<\/a><\/p>\n

After clearing cap space, the Browns were in a better spot but not quite in a place to enter bidding wars over star free agents. Per OvertheCap, Cleveland spent the least amount of money in free agency this year and was one of only four teams to sign 10 or fewer new free agent deals over the veteran minimum.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>That doesn\u2019t mean that free agency wasn\u2019t interesting. It was, of course, one of several avenues the team explored in order to fill its quarterbacks room.<\/p>\n

With a number of veteran passers owning Super Bowl experience on the market, Cleveland set a meeting with Russell Wilson<\/a> and expressed interest in Flacco and Carson Wentz<\/a>. Though the team appeared serious<\/a> about pursuing Wilson, its lack of interest in a long-term deal<\/a> with the 36-year-old hurt its chances of landing his signature. One veteran option fell off the table when Winston tired of waiting for a Browns offer and signed with the Giants, just for Wilson to follow suit four days later.<\/p>\n

Falcons passer Kirk Cousins<\/a> worked to find his way out of Atlanta this offseason, and the Browns were, once again, linked as a suitor<\/a>. Unable to secure his release, Cousins looked to find a trade partner after the draft. Cousins\u2019 name in connection to Cleveland<\/a> (and a reunion with Kevin Stefanski) would surge one last time a day before the draft, but Cousins ended up resigning to his fate in Atlanta as the NFL\u2019s most expensive backup quarterback.<\/p>\n

Not interested in waiting for a never-to-be post-draft trade, the Browns decided to bring back a familiar face in Flacco, whom they viewed in a similar light<\/a> to Cousins. Flacco had been the one to lead the team to its 2023 playoff appearance as Watson\u2019s replacement and had wanted to stay in Cleveland in 2024<\/a>, but no offer emerged<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Agreeing to a deal in Indianapolis, Flacco started six games in place of a benched and\/or injured Anthony Richardson<\/a>. Flacco made it known he wanted to play another year as soon as the season ended, and after entertaining interest from the Giants<\/a>, Steelers, and Vikings<\/a>, the 40-year-old QB made the decision to don the orange helmet once again. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Though Flacco was certainly an impactful signing, the two biggest contracts to newcomers came on the defensive line. After Garrett\u2019s 14 sacks in 2024, the next three top sack-getters on the line \u2014 Za\u2019Darius Smith<\/a> (five), Tomlinson (three), and Okoronkwo (three) \u2014 were no longer with the team. To reinforce the line, Cleveland brought in Collins, who matched a career-high five sacks in each of his past two seasons (in Houston and San Francisco). Collins should do perfectly well as a plug-and-play starter on a third team in three years.<\/p>\n

With Hudson, Wills, and Ifedi departing, answers were needed at tackle. The oft-injured Conklin slots into the right tackle spot for a potential final Browns season, and third-year spot starter \u2014 often for Conklin \u2014 Dawand Jones<\/a> is on track for the starting left tackle spot after undergoing an arthroscopic knee cleanup in February.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>After a down year for right guard Wyatt Teller<\/a>, there was some thought Teven Jenkins may push him for the starting job<\/a>. Even if he doesn\u2019t start, Jenkins\u2019 time in Chicago saw him start at left tackle and both guard spots, making him a valuable swingman. Lucas projects as the team\u2019s new swing tackle after serving in that role in Washington for the past five years, accumulating 38 starts over that time.<\/p>\n

After cutting Thornhill and letting McLeod walk in free agency, the Browns found some experienced, affordable safeties in Kazee and Rayshawn Jenkins<\/a>. Jenkins had worked out with the team in April but didn\u2019t receive an offer until hours after the team signed Kazee in mid-May. With Thornhill out, it looked like Jenkins or Kazee were coming in because of their extensive starting experience, but after spot starting for an injured Thornhill last year, undrafted third-year safety Ronnie Hickman<\/a> earned a chance to take on<\/a> a starting role in 2025.<\/p>\n

The last thing worth mentioning in free agency is the team\u2019s brief foray into the Diontae Johnson<\/a> experience. After a disjointed 2024 campaign that saw Johnson join and leave three different teams, the once-ballyhooed Steelers product received an opportunity<\/a> in Cleveland. In reality, the Browns were the only team who extended an offer, and though he had some strong moments in camp, the 29-year-old failed to land<\/a> on the 53-man roster.<\/p>\n

Re-signings:<\/p>\n

With Hicks retiring just one year into his two-season pact with the Browns, Cleveland thought it prudent to bring back Bush after the veteran started 10 games for the team last year. Nearly two months after he signed the new deal, though, Bush was arrested<\/a> on charges of simple assault and harassment. The former first-rounder now awaits a jury trial set for December 2. With the proceedings stretching so far into the season, any league discipline isn\u2019t likely to come until the 2026 season. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

After spending time on the Browns\u2019 practice squad in 2024, Szmyt\u2019s futures deal didn\u2019t seem especially notable when signed in January. When incumbent kicker Dustin Hopkins<\/a> failed to make the 53-man roster<\/a>, despite having signed a three-year, $15.9MM deal in 2024, it became clear the January transaction gave the Browns their kicker for the 2025 season \u2014 even as the team had insisted it wouldn\u2019t replace Hopkins at the end of last year.<\/p>\n

Szmyt, 26, will make his NFL debut Sunday. Szmyt was once named a consensus All-American and Lou Groza Award winner (for best kicker in Division I-FBS) in his redshirt freshman season at Syracuse, a season in which he converted 30 of 34 field goal attempts. After his Orange career concluded, Szmyt spent some of 2024 in the United Football League. He landed on Cleveland\u2019s practice squad on Christmas Eve, securing a shot as the Browns\u2019 kicker months later.<\/p>\n

Trades:<\/p>\n

In the Browns\u2019 exhaustive search for the best quarterback situation, the trade market offered some interesting options as the future of Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford<\/a> came into question<\/a> for a short period of time. With Los Angeles allowing the veteran to speak with other teams, the Browns threw their hat in the ring. Ultimately, Stafford stayed put, and no trade was made available to Cleveland.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Stafford wasn\u2019t the only quarterback already under contract the team had their eyes on. A little over a week after the Stafford news, the Browns made the move to acquire Pickett from the Eagles, sending them in return Thompson-Robinson and a pick that Philadelphia would eventually use<\/a> to move up from No. 32 to No. 31 in this year\u2019s draft. The Browns were familiar with Pickett from three games he started against them as a Steeler. Starting exactly 12 games in 2022 and \u201923, Pickett put up identical 7-5 records, though his second season saw his run as a starter end in a demotion in favor of Mason Rudolph<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Pickett made one start for the 2024 Eagles, appearing in five games. The move to Cleveland was a welcome one, as it would offer him an opportunity to compete for a starting job that was not going to be available in Philly. Upon arrival, Pickett became the only healthy passer under contract, but the possibility of other veterans and future rookies arriving still loomed.<\/p>\n

Pickett was alone atop the depth chart for about a month when Flacco came to town. It was another few weeks until the rookies (Dillon Gabriel<\/a>, Shedeur Sanders<\/a>) arrived. Despite the number of bodies in the room, and despite claims that the rookies would be given a chance to start, the four-way QB competition quickly turned into a battle between Pickett and Flacco with some believing that the loser would be traded and the winner backed up by rookies.<\/p>\n

Cleveland seemed to contradict that notion, clearly stating it was not planning to trade any QBs while multiple reports<\/a> ironically indicated that Pickett was the frontrunner in the competition. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

During OTAs, Pickett still held an early lead, and though the rookies were seeing fewer reps, Flacco was rumored to be a third in line<\/a> for the starting job. Following the conclusion of OTAs and minicamp, the tides started to turn in Flacco\u2019s favor. Still, the Browns quadrupled down on their openness to keep all four<\/a> passers, specifying now that no rookies would be traded<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Entering training camp, Flacco received the support of not only the coaches but of the veterans on the team<\/a>. The 18th-year vet seemed to benefit from his experience with the team and staff from the 2023 season. As the preseason approached, Pickett then encountered a hamstring injury<\/a>. This gave Flacco the majority of first-team reps in camp, with the rookies receiving more chances to gain ground.<\/p>\n

Once the preseason started, it became clear that Flacco was the guy. Pickett and Gabriel were unavailable for the team\u2019s first preseason game, so the Browns signed quarterback Tyler Huntley<\/a> to ensure Flacco would not need to suit up until the final preseason game. As the preseason continued, the narrative remained that cuts in the QBs room were unlikely to happen<\/a>, save that of Huntley when the extra body was no longer a necessity.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Before the final preseason game, Flacco was officially named the team\u2019s starter. Sunday will be his first Week 1 start since 2022, when he was a Jets Zach Wilson<\/a> injury sub. Flacco\u2019s last Week 1 start as a preferred option came in 2019 with the Broncos.<\/p>\n

When the preseason wrapped up, Berry made sure to confirm one more time that Cleveland was keeping all four QBs. The next day, Pickett was traded to Las Vegas, where backup passer Aidan O\u2019Connell<\/a> had suffered a wrist fracture. This positions Pickett as Vegas\u2019 QB2 for at least six weeks. Pickett joined fellow 2022 draftee Sam Howell<\/a> as a twice-traded quarterback this offseason.<\/p>\n

The Browns also made two minor trades in the days before the final roster cut deadline \u2014 a time at which trades of that nature often occur. The first sent Briggs, a seventh-round 2024 draftee who appeared pretty frequently in the team\u2019s last six games after not appearing in the first 11, to New York. The second saw Cleveland send a 2028 seventh-round pick to Los Angeles for Leveston, who will add to the depth at tackle alongside Lucas and Jenkins.<\/p>\n

The Browns checked in on some players that weren\u2019t likely to be traded, inquiring with New Orleans<\/a> on receiver Chris Olave<\/a> and calling Cincinnati<\/a> as star pass rusher Trey Hendrickson<\/a> continued to demand a trade amid his contract dispute. The Saints rebuffed any notions of a trade, and reports emerged that Cleveland was not \u201cseriously pursuing<\/a>\u201d Hendrickson \u2014 in what would have been an unrealistic intra-AFC North trade.<\/p>\n

Draft:<\/p>\n

Round 1, No. 5 (from Jaguars):\u00a0Mason Graham<\/a>\u00a0(DT, Michigan) (signed<\/a>)
\nRound 2, No. 33:\u00a0Carson Schwesinger<\/a>\u00a0(LB, UCLA) (signed<\/a>)
\nRound 2, No. 36 (from Jaguars):\u00a0Quinshon Judkins<\/a>\u00a0(RB, Ohio State) (signed)
\nRound 3, No. 67:\u00a0Harold Fannin Jr.<\/a>\u00a0(TE, Bowling Green) (signed<\/a>)
\nRound 3, No. 94 (from Bills):\u00a0Dillon Gabriel<\/a>\u00a0(QB, Oregon) (signed<\/a>)
\nRound 4, No. 126 (from Vikings through Jaguars):\u00a0Dylan Sampson<\/a>\u00a0(RB, Tennessee) (signed<\/a>)
\nRound 5, No. 144 (from Patriots through Seahawks):\u00a0Shedeur Sanders<\/a>\u00a0(QB, Colorado) (signed<\/a>)<\/p>\n

While Winston\u2019s interest in re-signing was certainly something to consider, Cleveland held the No. 2 overall pick, and it made all the sense in the world to believe that pick may be utilized on a quarterback. Interestingly enough, the first hint of quarterback news we saw in the Browns\u2019 offseason was Sanders lining up his visit<\/a> with the team. Sanders was, at the time, thought to be in contention with Miami (Fla.) QB Cam Ward<\/a> to be this year\u2019s No. 1 overall pick. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Initially, there were thoughts that Tennessee may be looking to trade out of No. 1, and Cleveland was immediately a candidate to move up. The team even inquired with Tennessee<\/a> about obtaining the pick, but ultimately, Berry called it an \u201cunlikely<\/a>\u201d possibility, with the team even offering to field calls<\/a> for its No. 2 overall choice. In the end, it became clear the Titans were standing pat when they canceled a visit with Sanders<\/a> as they fell more and more in love with Ward.<\/p>\n

At this point, the Browns had begun to do serious homework on the draft\u2019s QB prospects. They also conducted a workout with Ward, and perhaps seeing a stark difference between Ward and Sanders, their vision of Sanders as a top-two pick began to fade. As his stock started to fall, the impression around the league still pointed to the two-year Colorado starter being a first-round pick<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Knowing they were no longer in a prime position to land the draft\u2019s only passer worthy of a top-10 investment, the Browns began flirting with another idea \u2014 drafting a non-QB at No. 2 overall and trading back into the first round<\/a> for passers that may be more likely to fall towards the end of Day 1. At the time, that crop still included Sanders. The plan was to trade up because the draft class was deep in starter-level players<\/a> throughout the first three rounds but lacked the top-end talent that would\u2019ve allowed QB-needy teams to entice clubs later on<\/a> in the first round to move up.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Without a focus on quarterback at No. 2, Cleveland shifted its attention. Early on, it appeared Penn State pass rusher Abdul Carter<\/a> was the preferred option<\/a>, but the Browns quickly set up a meeting with Colorado two-way athlete Travis Hunter<\/a>. With Ward out of reach and interest in Carter waning, Cleveland set additional meetings<\/a> with Hunter and his quarterback. Some predictions indicated Hunter could be the favorite at No. 2<\/a> and Sanders could be the team\u2019s target via a trade back into Round 1. This prediction seemed especially attractive considering the Browns viewed Hunter as more of a wide receiver<\/a> than cornerback.<\/p>\n

As time went on the team hosted several top prospects \u2014 like Georgia linebacker Jalon Walker<\/a> and Arizona wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan<\/a> \u2014 but also met with eventual draftees like running back Quinshon Judkins<\/a>, wide receiver Isaiah Bond<\/a>, and defensive tackle Mason Graham<\/a>. They even hosted Carter a second time<\/a>, and reports came out that Cleveland was still undecided<\/a> on who it would take at No. 2.<\/p>\n

With the rookie QB plan starting over from scratch, the Browns made everyone a possibility, starting with Tyler Shough<\/a>, then moving on to private workouts with\u00a0Jaxson Dart<\/a> and Jalen Milroe <\/a>before meeting up, once again, with Sanders at his pro day. At the pro day, the Browns planned a private Sanders workout<\/a> before hosting Dart, Milroe, and Shough all for a group visit<\/a> a couple days later. The talk in the days after hinted that the Browns liked Milroe<\/a> \u201ca lot.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>With Pickett and Flacco in tow, the Browns prepared for the draft with a mindset that Flacco\u2019s addition would not change their approach to the position. They still planned to add a passer in the draft, but one of the players they had been linked to was starting to slide. By the time the draft arrived, Hunter was increasingly expected<\/a> to be the team\u2019s top pick, but first-round grades on Sanders were hard to find<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The phone lines were busy in the days leading up to the draft. The Browns received calls<\/a> from teams interested in moving up to No. 2, and after it was reported the Giants had tried and failed<\/a> to trade into the No. 1 pick, Cleveland knew it might be competing with New York when looking to get back in the first round for a quarterback at the end of the night.<\/p>\n

On draft day, the Browns were still fielding calls, and the Jaguars emerged as the team seriously intending to move up to No. 2 overall. At the same time, the Browns appeared to be moving away from their plan of trading back into Round 1 as they expressed a desire to retain their pick<\/a> at the top of Round 2. In the hours before the event, Cleveland utilized its 10-pick arsenal to acquire an additional fifth-round pick<\/a> in both this year\u2019s draft and the 2027 draft from Houston.<\/p>\n

With the Browns finally on the clock at No. 2 overall, another trade occurred, allowing Jacksonville to claim Hunter as their prize but netting Cleveland a new set of picks for the ongoing draft and the Jaguars\u2019 first-rounder in 2026. The trade \u2014 one Jags GM James Gladstone said had been worked out weeks before the draft \u2014 slotted the Browns at No. 5 overall now, and Graham fell into their lap. Later reports<\/a> posited Cleveland was looking to move back into the first for Dart<\/a>, but it was the Giants who appeared to be working the phones<\/a> hardest before pulling the trigger on a trade-up.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Having stuck to their new plan of not moving up, the Browns had to turn down several offers<\/a> from teams looking to acquire the No. 33 overall pick. They stood pat and used two of the first four picks of the second round on Schwesinger and Judkins, though some believed LSU tight end Mason Taylor<\/a> may have been a possible target.<\/p>\n

At this point, the Browns seemed to be past their gameplan for drafting a quarterback. The first two rounds of the draft had passed by, and a third passer, Shough, went to New Orleans. Two picks before Cleveland\u2019s last Day 2 selection, the fourth quarterback came off the board when Seattle selected Milroe. Though the Browns had seemingly liked Milroe, they would later insist that their next pick, Gabriel, would\u2019ve been the choice regardless of Milroe\u2019s availability<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The draft continued, as did Sanders\u2019 historic slide, until Cleveland made the move to trade their final two picks to move up 22 slots and select the quarterback out of Colorado. The Browns had not intended to draft two quarterbacks<\/a>, but they felt that, with their QB future so up in the air at that moment, they couldn\u2019t pass up the potential Sanders held at that point in the draft<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Looking back, many connected Sanders\u2019 slide to immaturity<\/a> as he came off as arrogant and disrespectful in pre-draft meetings with teams. The second-generation NFLer didn\u2019t do much to disprove that theory after arriving in Cleveland and quickly getting cited for driving 101 mph in a 60-mph zone<\/a>. Multiple speeding violations occurred this offseason.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>As covered above, initial thoughts were that Gabriel and Sanders were safe with Flacco starting as the odd man out. Gabriel was reportedly being given a chance to compete<\/a> with Pickett and Flacco for the starting role, but both rookies were given fewer opportunities throughout OTAs. At the moment mentioned above when Flacco was rumored to be QB3, it was Gabriel who was seemingly next in line<\/a> for the starting role. It came as no surprise, then, that Cleveland was forced to rebuff several trade offers<\/a> for Gabriel throughout the offseason.<\/p>\n

Even though it soon became apparent neither rookie was likely to start \u2014 and Sanders was apparently highly unlikely to start<\/a> \u2014 the preseason arrived, and it was Sanders in the spotlight. With Flacco sitting, Pickett injured, and Gabriel limited with a similar injury, Sanders received the start in the team\u2019s preseason opener and performed admirably. Gabriel took the reins in the second preseason game as Sanders dealt with an injury of his own, then the final preseason game saw Gabriel featured much more heavily than Sanders.<\/p>\n

Flacco had already been named the starter by then, and both rookies knew they were safe from being cut because that would expose them on the waiver wire, and Cleveland couldn\u2019t risk losing its drafted arms to a waiver claim. Following Pickett\u2019s trade to Las Vegas, Gabriel was officially named the primary backup<\/a>, setting Sanders as QB3.<\/p>\n

For the other draft picks, Graham will start alongside Collins. Schwesinger was deemed likely to start<\/a>, as well, especially with Bush\u2019s legal issues and Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah<\/a> set to spend the year on the reserve\/PUP<\/a> list as he continues to recover from last year\u2019s scary neck injury<\/a>. Fannin, on the other hand, will need some development as more of a long-term project<\/a> at tight end. \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Ford is set to fend off both Judkins and Sampson for the Week 1 starting job. Sampson stands a stronger chance at getting more run early, while Judkins was away from the team for an extended period of time after being arrested on charges of battery and domestic violence<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Because of his legal situation, Judkins did not report to training camp with the rest of the team. Haslam remained cautiously optimistic<\/a> that Judkins would be able to play this year, and when it was announced that the national championship-winning RB would no longer face charges<\/a> and there was no imminent discipline from the league on its way, that looked to be the case.<\/p>\n

With both the Nos. 35 and 37 draftees receiving fully guaranteed rookie deals, the Browns found it simple enough to give Judkins full guarantees<\/a> on his, agreeing to terms the day before their season opener. A potential suspension \u2014 which has not been determined yet \u2014 undoubtedly held up these negotiations. Judkins will not play in Week 1, as he has not practiced since the offseason program.<\/p>\n

Other:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Though Stefanski and Berry remained in place, other changes occurred within the coaching staff and front office. The easiest change saw 2024\u2019s coaching and personnel consultant, Vrabel, depart to accept the head coaching job for the team he played eight years and won three Super Bowls with. A Cleveland-area native, Vrabel claimed he would\u2019ve listened to offers<\/a> to remain in his hometown, but it was going to be hard to beat the opportunity he received in New England.<\/p>\n

After finishing the season ranked last in scoring offense, the Browns fired Dorsey and Dickerson. Cleveland interviewed five candidates<\/a> to replace Dorsey as OC, opting to promote from within and give the job to Rees, who had been the team\u2019s tight ends coach\/pass-game specialist in 2024.<\/p>\n

Rees, 33, had also been rumored as a candidate to follow Vrabel to New England and serve as his OC. Even before Rees\u2019 promotion, the team had brought on Bloomgren from the college ranks to replace Dickerson after spending the last seven years as the head coach at Rice.<\/p>\n

Rees\u2019 promotion does not come with an opportunity to call plays. Following Cleveland\u2019s abysmal offensive season, Stefanski reclaimed play-calling duties<\/a>, with plans to return to his previous, more successful scheme<\/a> focused on a strong run game that can open up the play-action passing game more, a Flacco special.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Newsome went through a tumultuous offseason. After expressing interest in a long-term extension last year, the former first-round cornerback was set to head into 2025 playing on a fifth-year option<\/a>. After Newsome voiced disappointment<\/a> in the evolution of his role \u2014 as Emerson received more run across from Denzel Ward<\/a> at cornerback \u2014 the Browns shopped the disgruntled CB<\/a> (when it looked like Hunter would be coming to Northeast Ohio in the draft). It turned into a consolidated effort to begin offloading expiring deals for 2026 draft picks under assumptions that they may not be contending for a title this year.<\/p>\n

Newsome\u2019s fortunes changed, unfortunately, at the detriment of Emerson\u2019s health. Emerson suffered a torn Achilles tendon<\/a>, landing on season-ending IR, thus returning Newsome to a more prominent role.<\/p>\n

Watson, after reinjuring his Achilles tendon, resumed throwing in May. Despite progress, the 29-year-old opens the year on reserve\/PUP list<\/a>. The offseason finally saw Haslam admit<\/a> that trading for and extending Watson was \u201ca big swing-and-miss.\u201d Considering the efforts to replace Watson this year consisted of signing a 40-year-old Flacco, trading for (then trading away) Pickett, and drafting two mid-round rookies, many presume that Cleveland has its eyes on the prospects<\/a> in the 2026 draft \u2014 which is expected to feature a better QB crop compared to 2025.<\/p>\n

Top 10 cap charges for 2025:<\/p>\n

Deshaun Watson<\/a>, QB: $35.98MM
\nDenzel Ward<\/a>, CB: $24.57MM
\nMyles Garrett<\/a>, DE: $22.92MM
\nWyatt Teller<\/a>, G: $14.18MM
\nGreg Newsome<\/a>, CB: $13.38MM
\nJoel Bitonio<\/a>, G: $11.94MM
\nDavid Njoku<\/a>, TE: $11.44MM
\nJerry Jeudy<\/a>, WR: $7.98MM
\nEthan Pocic<\/a>, C: $7.77MM
\nMason Graham<\/a>, DT: $7.44MM<\/p>\n

It is hard to have a ton of hope for Cleveland heading into the 2025 NFL season, but that doesn\u2019t mean there isn\u2019t any. Flacco will lead the team to open the season, but if the Browns fall out of contention early, Gabriel or even Sanders may earn some opportunities to convince the coaching staff and front office that taking a first-round quarterback with one of their two Day 1 picks next year is not a given. And a defense that was a strength at times last year now carries Graham and Schwesinger as new building blocks.<\/p>\n

There is a bit to look forward to past the 2025 season in Cleveland. When the season ends, the team will be another year closer to being past the hideous Watson contract. (The deal expires after the 2026 season, but the restructures create a likelihood the franchise will face historic dead money figures in the late 2020s.) The staff will continue to determine which pieces are worth holding onto as the Browns establish a new identity, and if things go unexpectedly well this year, then they\u2019ll perhaps have yet another crack at ending their 30-plus-year drought of back-to-back winning seasons.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It had been a while since the Browns had felt the lows felt in 2024. Since Cleveland drafted…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":349038,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2054],"tags":[86,85,54,2337,7,6,35822,4442],"class_list":{"0":"post-349037","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-cleveland-browns","8":"tag-browns","9":"tag-cleveland","10":"tag-cleveland-browns","11":"tag-clevelandbrowns","12":"tag-football","13":"tag-nfl","14":"tag-offseason-in-review","15":"tag-pfr-originals"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/channels.im\/@nfl\/115163278679518572","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=349037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349037\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/349038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=349037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=349037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=349037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}