{"id":714620,"date":"2026-01-29T18:56:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T18:56:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/714620\/"},"modified":"2026-01-29T18:56:15","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T18:56:15","slug":"packers-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-aaron-banks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/714620\/","title":{"rendered":"Packers Cap Casualties 2026: The case for and against Aaron Banks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">After touching on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.acmepackingcompany.com\/green-bay-packers-analysis\/78557\/potential-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-elgton-jenkins\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Elgton Jenkins<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.acmepackingcompany.com\/green-bay-packers-analysis\/78432\/potential-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-rashan-gary\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Rashan Gary<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.acmepackingcompany.com\/green-bay-packers-analysis\/78655\/potential-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-josh-jacobs\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Josh Jacobs<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.acmepackingcompany.com\/green-bay-packers-analysis\/78671\/potential-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-keisean-nixon\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Keisean Nixon<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.acmepackingcompany.com\/green-bay-packers-analysis\/78776\/potential-cap-casualties-2026-the-case-for-and-against-nate-hobbs\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Nate Hobbs<\/a>, my tour through potential cap casualties in Green Bay concludes with a look at Aaron Banks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Banks was a bit of a surprising signing for the Packers last spring, but the vision made sense. The Packers were clearly looking to get bigger on the offensive line, and the 6-foot-5, 325-pound Banks certainly fit the bill.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Unfortunately, Banks got off to a rough start in Green Bay. Injuries dogged most of his early tenure with the team, and he was plagued by additional uncertainty to his right as Elgton Jenkins worked into the lineup at center, a position he had played sparingly with the Packers. Then, Jenkins himself was lost for the season, throwing the Packers\u2019 offensive line into further disarray.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Though Banks and the offensive line did improve down the stretch, he now heads into the offseason at a crossroads. His cap number is set to climb, and his performance his first year in Green Bay was disappointing. Will that add up to an exit this spring?<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Banks has two things going for him: he\u2019s exactly what the Packers are looking for on the offensive line, at least from a physical perspective, and he\u2019s almost too expensive to justify cutting.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The Packers\u2019 offensive line has been trending bigger lately, coinciding with Matt LaFleur\u2019s increasing usage of inside, power-based run schemes. Banks\u2019 physical attributes, for all his struggles last year, fit that approach to perfection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">And from a cap perspective, releasing Banks wouldn\u2019t net that much in terms of savings. His capt hit jumps to $24.79 million this offseason, but cutting him would create only about $4.5 million in space, though the Packers obviously would be free of his cap obligations the next two seasons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The case against Aaron Banks<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">However, the argument in favor of keeping Banks must reckon with one serious problem: he wasn\u2019t very good.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Pro Football Focus grades aren\u2019t the be-all, end-all of analysis, but they\u2019re a helpful starting point. And for a player paid as richly as Banks was in 2025, his grades didn\u2019t match his paycheck.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Among players who played at least 500 snaps in 2025, Banks ranked 49th out of 67 guards, and his overall grade of 55.6 slots nicely among his other season-long grades to date. He\u2019s never been a high-caliber player, based on these grades, and 2025 didn\u2019t look like it was a step toward stardom<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Worse, Banks ranked 47th out of 67 guards as a run blocker, which was supposed to be his forte when he joined the Packers. For context, Banks ranked well behind Jordan Morgan (37th out of 67), which is problematic for two reasons. First, Morgan isn\u2019t a guard by trade, meaning Banks got outplayed by a tackle moonlighting at guard. And second, Morgan generally isn\u2019t counted upon to be a good run blocker. That\u2019s a troubling profile for the Packers\u2019 high-priced free agent signing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">And the price is high. Though his cap hit will be lower in 2027 and 2028 (assuming he\u2019s with the team), Banks is still set to cost nearly $25 million against the cap in 2026. As of this writing, only four other guards in the NFL will have a higher cap hit this season, according to Spotrac, and one of them is Houston\u2019s Tytus Howard, who played more tackle than guard for the Texans this season.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Bottom line: Aaron Banks is probably safe, but needs to be better in 2026<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">The rest of the roster may be what saves Banks. The Packers already look likely to need new faces at both left tackle and center with Rasheed Walker and Elgton Jenkins looking iffy, at best, for next season. With right guard (and substitute center) Sean Rhyan also hitting free agency, do the Packers really want to add left guard to their list of offseason needs? I think not.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">Banks probably survives as a gesture toward stability if nothing else. Turning over four of your five starting offensive line spots in the midst of what you believe is a Super Bowl window is not ideal, and with Zach Tom needing major surgery, Banks looks like something of a beacon of stability at this point \u2014 for whatever that\u2019s worth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup duet--article--standard-paragraph _1nfb3k4i _16w9vov1 _16w9vov0 ls9zuh1\">But Banks has to be better. He\u2019s paid like one of the best guards in the league, but he played like a bottom half starter. That\u2019s not good enough. I\u2019m sure Banks is aware that he needs to step it up in 2026, or else he\u2019ll be looking for another team with offensive line needs in 2027.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"After touching on Elgton Jenkins, Rashan Gary, Josh Jacobs, Keisean Nixon, and Nate Hobbs, my tour through potential&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":714621,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2072],"tags":[7,41,345,52919,2514,2513,6,428],"class_list":{"0":"post-714620","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-green-bay-packers","8":"tag-football","9":"tag-green-bay","10":"tag-green-bay-packers","11":"tag-green-bay-packers-analysis","12":"tag-greenbay","13":"tag-greenbaypackers","14":"tag-nfl","15":"tag-packers"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/channels.im\/@nfl\/115979916878924836","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=714620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714620\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/714621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=714620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=714620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=714620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}