Super Bowl LX received more attention for the city of San Francisco and the Bay Area hosting the game then the actual game did itself.<\/p>\n
On the field, the Super Bowl was a bit of a dud. The Seattle Seahawks manhandled the outmatched New England Patriots and waltzed to an easy victory. Most of the headlines around the game featured around Bad Bunny\u2019s halftime show and the city of San Francisco as a host.<\/p>\n
The halftime show from Bad Bunny was widely appreciated by the millions and millions who watched it<\/a> and didn\u2019t sequester themselves away from the rest of the world in their safe space with Kid Rock\u2019s lip synching.<\/p>\n As for the city of San Francisco? That is still a subject of debate.<\/p>\n Pat McAfee was among those skeptics that had heard all the chatter about what a disaster the city was, but came out of it singing the praises of the Bay Area<\/a>. Some of the lcoal Boston hosts who made the trip called it a \u201czombie apocalypse<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n As for Michael Irvin, you can definitely put him in the latter category.<\/p>\n The Hall of Famer\u2019s Super Bowl rant happened last week on his YouTube channel<\/a> but began to spread like wildfire on social media this week.<\/p>\n Michael Irvin on the Super Bowl played in Santa Clara:<\/p>\n \u201cThis was a horrible Super Bowl. They should never ever, ever, ever bring the Super Bowl back to San Francisco. In all the years of going to a Super Bowl, this was the worst. It was blah in the city. It just wasn\u2019t jumping.\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/XVwC9dlkfF<\/a><\/p>\n