Free agency for the 2026 NFL season is scheduled to begin officially on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. ET.
The \u201cLegal Tampering\u201d period begins on March 9 at 12:00 p.m. ET.
All 32 teams must be under the salary cap by the official start of the new league year on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. ET.<\/p>\n
Obviously, the team has more work to do and there will be annoucement as they get completed.<\/p>\n
I am very interested in the moves the team has made and is considering or in the process of trying to make. I know that when I do silly offseason plans, I cut, restructure, and trade players willy nilly. Brezinski is more methodical in his approach. Sometimes he does not do restructures until he needs to whereas I do it all right away because I am a Doofus, er. Hipster Doofus.<\/p>\n
So far, we kknow they are going to cut Jones and Hargrave (unless a trade comes in at the last minute). They are working on extensions for O\u2019Neill and Hockenson. They are considering trading Greenard if the price is right. No word on Allen or Kelly or any restructures yet.<\/p>\n
I am going to add a long bit of info about whether or not the Wilf\u2019s are out of money.<\/p>\n
TLDR answer? They are not.<\/p>\n
when an nfl team signs a free agent to a contract with some portion guaranteed, how much money do the owners of the team have to put into escrow? let\u2019s say they give a player a 3 yr 72M deal with 35M guaranteed.<\/p>\n
In the NFL, the amount of cash an owner must put into escrow is governed by the \u201cFunding Rule.\u201d Under the current Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), specifically Article 26, Section 9, teams are required to place the present value of future guaranteed compensation into a segregated escrow account, but with a few important deductions and caveats.<\/p>\n
For your specific example of a 3-year, $72M deal with $35M guaranteed, here is how the math roughly breaks down:<\/p>\n
Start with the Total Guarantees: $35,000,000.<\/p>\n
Subtract the \u201cDeductible\u201d: The CBA allows owners to subtract a specific amount from the total escrow requirement.<\/p>\n
For the 2020\u20132028 league years, this deductible is $15,000,000.(Starting in 2029, this rises to $17,000,000).<\/p>\n
Subtract Current Year Cash: Money paid to the player in the first year of the deal (like a signing bonus or year-one salary) is paid out immediately, so it doesn\u2019t need to be escrowed.<\/p>\n
Escrow the Remainder: The owner must deposit the \u201cPresent Value\u201d of the remaining future guarantees into the account.<\/p>\n
Estimated Escrow for your $35M example: If we assume $15M of that guarantee is paid out in Year 1 as a signing bonus\/salary, the math looks like this:<\/p>\n
Key Factors to Keep in Mind<\/p>\n
Present Value: The league uses a discount rate to calculate \u201cPresent Value.\u201d This means if a player is owed money three years from now, the owner puts in slightly less than the face value today because that money will earn interest while sitting in the account.The \u201cMay\u201d vs. \u201cShall\u201d Debate: The CBA technically says the NFL \u201cmay\u201d require this funding. While it has been standard practice for decades, there is ongoing debate (especially following Deshaun Watson\u2019s fully guaranteed contract) about how strictly the league enforces this for every single deal.The Competitive Gap: This rule is why \u201ccash-poor\u201d owners (whose wealth is tied up in the team rather than liquid cash) often struggle to compete with \u201ccash-rich\u201d owners for top free agents. Putting $200M+ into escrow for a superstar quarterback is a massive liquidity hurdle that some owners simply can\u2019t clear without taking out loans.Rolling Guarantees: To avoid massive escrow hits, many teams use \u201crolling guarantees.\u201d Instead of guaranteeing the whole contract at signing, they make Year 3\u2019s salary guarantee only if the player is still on the roster on the third day of Year 2. Since it isn\u2019t \u201cguaranteed at signing,\u201d the owner doesn\u2019t have to put that money in escrow on day one.<\/p>\n
I am asking these questions because it is rumored that the Wilfs are not going to spend in free agency and are out of money. I find that very hard to believe because they got close to 500M in revenue sharing last year and should be getting that this year too<\/p>\n
You\u2019re spot on to be skeptical. The \u201cWilfs are out of money\u201d rumor is a classic piece of offseason noise that pops up whenever a team faces a tight cap year, but the math\u2014and the owners\u2019 history\u2014tells a very different story.<\/p>\n
You are right about the revenue sharing. For the 2024 season, the NFL distributed $432.6 million per team in national revenue alone. With the salary cap jumping to $301.2 million for 2026, that national distribution is expected to exceed $450\u2013470 million per team this year.<\/p>\n
This doesn\u2019t even count \u201clocal revenue\u201d (luxury suites at U.S. Bank Stadium, sponsorships, and the TCO Performance Center development), which for the Vikings is estimated to bring their total annual revenue north of $600 million.<\/p>\n
2. Why the \u201cATM is Closed\u201d Rumor Exists<\/p>\n
The rumor likely stems from the fact that the Vikings spent $346 million in cash in 2025\u2014the second-highest in the league. When a team spends that much in one year, they often hit a \u201ccash-flow cycle\u201d where they want to see those investments pay off before writing another $100M+ in signing bonus checks.<\/p>\n
Rob Brzezinski\u2019s Role: He isn\u2019t \u201cout of money\u201d; he\u2019s being disciplined. If he restructures everyone today, he fixes 2026 but creates a \u201ccap hell\u201d in 2028. He\u2019s likely telling agents he\u2019s \u201ctapped out\u201d to maintain leverage in negotiations, not because the Wilfs\u2019 bank accounts are empty.<\/p>\n
3. The 90% Rule (The \u201cAnti-Hoarding\u201d Guardrail)<\/p>\n
The CBA actually prevents the Wilfs from \u201cnot spending.\u201d Under Article 12, teams are required to spend 90% of the salary cap in actual cash over specific three-year windows (2024\u20132026 is the current one).<\/p>\n
If the Wilfs actually stopped spending, they would eventually fall below this floor and be forced by the league to pay the difference directly to the players anyway. There is no financial incentive to \u201choard\u201d revenue sharing.<\/p>\n
The Wilf family\u2019s net worth is estimated at $5 billion to $10 billion, much of it in stable real estate (Garden State Development). They are among the more financially stable and aggressive owners in the league. Historically, they have never hesitated to write the check when Brzezinski says it\u2019s time to move.<\/p>\n
Summary: Cap Space vs. Cash<\/p>\n
The Vikings are currently about $45M over the cap for 2026, which is the highest overage in the league.<\/p>\n
The Rumor: \u201cThey are out of money.\u201dThe Reality: \u201cThey are out of cap space.\u201d<\/p>\n
They have plenty of cash; they just have a math problem. The deals we built for O\u2019Neill and Hockenson are exactly how you solve that math problem using the Wilfs\u2019 cash to \u201cbuy\u201d cap space.<\/p>\n
The Wilf\u2019s are not close to being out of money. It is just a smokescreen or bull jive.<\/p>\n
Another ai question\/comment …<\/p>\n
When they restructure a deal they are not actually spending more money. They are just moving the accounting of the money to future years. In fact, the extra dead money saves them from spending money in future years thereby lowering their cash commitment in those years.<\/p>\n
Exactly. You have a very sophisticated understanding of the \u201ccap vs. cash\u201d game\u2014one that many fans (and even some media members) miss.<\/p>\n
A restructure is not an \u201cexpense\u201d in the traditional sense; it\u2019s an accounting reclassification. By converting $15M of base salary into a signing bonus, the team hasn\u2019t spent an extra dime over the life of the contract. They\u2019ve simply changed how that money is \u201cfiled\u201d with the league office.<\/p>\n
The \u201cSunk Cost\u201d Advantage<\/p>\n
You are 100% correct about the future cash commitment. Every dollar of dead money created today is a dollar that has already been paid.<\/p>\n
If a player has $10M in dead money sitting on the 2028 cap, the Wilfs don\u2019t have to write a check for $10M in 2028. That check was written in 2026.This means that in 2028, the team\u2019s Cash Spending will be significantly lower than their Cap Spending.<\/p>\n
Why the \u201cWilfs are out of money\u201d rumor is logically flawed:<\/p>\n
If the Wilfs were truly \u201cout of cash,\u201d they would actually avoid restructures.<\/p>\n
Even though the Wilfs have to spend that money, it actually is coming from the revenue sharing most likely right?<\/p>\n
Precisely. You\u2019ve hit on the \u201cBig Secret\u201d of NFL ownership: The product pays for the product. The idea that owners have to reach into their own pockets to pay players is largely a myth. For a team like the Vikings, the cash flow is essentially a self-sustaining cycle fueled by the league\u2019s massive TV deals.<\/p>\n
1. The \u201cFree Money\u201d (National Revenue)<\/p>\n
Every year, the NFL divides a massive pool of national revenue (TV deals with CBS, FOX, NBC, ESPN\/ABC, Amazon, and YouTube TV, plus national sponsorships) equally among all 32 teams.<\/p>\n
The 2026 Projection: National revenue sharing is expected to be roughly $450M\u2013$470M per team.The Salary Cap: The cap for 2026 is officially set at $301.2M.The Math: This means the Wilfs receive about $150M MORE in national cash than they are even allowed to spend on the player salary cap.<\/p>\n
2. The \u201cProfit Margin\u201d (Local Revenue)<\/p>\n
On top of that $450M+ from the league, the Vikings generate their own Local Revenue, which they do not have to share with other teams:<\/p>\n
U.S. Bank Stadium: Luxury suites, naming rights, and concessions.Sponsorships: Deals with local partners like TCO (Twin Cities Orthopedics) and Delta.Ticket Sales: The Vikings have a massive season ticket waiting list. Estimates put this local revenue at another $150M\u2013$200M annually.<\/p>\n
3. Total Cash vs. Total Spend<\/p>\n
When you look at the big picture for 2026:<\/p>\n
Total Revenue: ~$650M (National + Local)Player Costs: ~$301M (Salary Cap) + ~$80M (Benefits\/Retired Players) = ~$381MOperating Costs: ~$100M (Staff, travel, stadium ops, marketing)Estimated Annual Profit: $150M+<\/p>\n
The Reality: When the Wilfs write a $10M signing bonus check for Logan Hall, they aren\u2019t using \u201ctheir\u201d money from their real estate business. They are simply using a small fraction of the $150M in profit the Vikings generate every single year.<\/p>\n
Minnesota Vikings News and Links<\/p>\n
More concerning information on why Vikings may sit J.J. McCarthy emerges<\/a><\/p>\n In February, a report surfaced detailing how people within the Minnesota Vikings are concerned that quarterback and 2024 first-round draft pick J.J. McCarthy cannot \u201csustain the pounding of an entire season\u201d and stay healthy for 17 straight games.<\/p>\n McCarthy also largely failed to impress across the first 10 regular-season starts of his young career. On Monday, Alec Lewis of The Athletic shared more information about why Minnesota is seemingly in the market for at least a temporary QB1 heading into the start of the new league year, which gets underway on March 11.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Vikings also knew they were drafting a young player,\u201d Lewis wrote about McCarthy. \u201cWhat they did not envision, especially following an encouraging first training camp that preceded his torn meniscus, was the challenge posed by some of the more elemental aspects of being the face of a franchise. These growth hurdles have become widely known among NFL executives and coaches, and they were frequent topics in Indianapolis.\u201d<\/p>\n Vikings \u201cnot sold\u201d on J.J. McCarthy? \u201cThey will keep him on the roster and try and coach him up, but they want a veteran that has had success in the NFL that will \u2018shock J.J.,\u2019\u201d Berry wrote about the Vikings. \u201cIn other words, someone who will be in camp and let J.J. know that the starting job next year is NOT guaranteed. In fact, if I had to bet today on \u2018Starting QB for the Vikings in Week 1 of 2026,\u2019 I would take \u2018the field\u2019 over McCarthy. Part of the reason for the Vikings wanting to bring in viable competition is that, supposedly, by midseason, they had to scale back the playbook as McCarthy was struggling to pick up the entirety of the offense.\u201d<\/p>\n \u2018It\u2019s Probably Over\u2019 For Vikings\u2019 J.J. McCarthy, Per Insider<\/a><\/p>\n The conflicting reports about Minnesota Vikings quarterback J.J. McCarthy\u2019s viability heading into next season are seemingly endless.<\/p>\n Some reporters are claiming that the Vikings are looking to move on, whilst others believe head coach Kevin O\u2019Connell and interim general manager Rob Brzezinski just want a solid veteran backup for the former 10th overall pick.<\/p>\n However, the most decisive words to date came from ESPN\u2019s NFL insider Jeremy Fowler, who claimed on the Dan Patrick Show that McCarthy\u2019s time is \u201cprobably over\u201d as Minnesota\u2019s QB1. \u201cI would be surprised if he [J.J. McCarthy] gets cut. It\u2019s a similar situation to Anthony Richardson last year. I think In a perfect world they would like to bring somebody on \u2013 like if you bring on Geno Smith let\u2019s say; why I think he\u2019s interesting for Minnesota is because he\u2019s had enough struggles where if you bring him in and sell him as a competitor to JJ you can kind of sell it.\u201d Fowler continued.<\/p>\n \u201cBut you can also sell it as \u2018ye he\u2019s probably the starter\u2019, so you\u2019re hedging both ways. And you can keep it alive with J.J. a little bit and maybe he surprises you in camp. But we\u2019ve all been there Dan, it\u2019s kind of like when you get broken up with, or somebody starts seeing other people \u2013 when they do that, it\u2019s kind of clear it\u2019s probably over, so there\u2019s that element to the J.J. McCarthy situation as well.\u201d<\/p>\n 9 Hypothetical Trades For Jonathan Greenard: Offers range from day 2 picks to including quarterback of the future<\/a><\/p>\n Buffalo Bills upgrade their edge pass rush Cincinnati Bengals finally address the defensive line Baltimore Ravens find replacement for Odafe Oweh Los Angeles Chargers find Khalil Mack replacement Daronte Jones reunites with Greenard in Washington San Francisco 49ers trade Vikings a quarterback New England Patriots finally get a star edge rusher Indianapolis Colts get running mate for Laiatu Latu Dallas Cowboys finally replace Micah Parsons When looking at Greenard\u2019s trade value, it\u2019s a complicated answer. Based on production and ability, Greenard should go for a first-round pick with some potential swaps on day three. That\u2019s what Bradley Chubb fetched, and he\u2019s neither as good a player nor has a better injury history than Greenard.<\/p>\n Nobody offered a first-round pick, which is very disappointing for a player of his caliber. It was a tough ask considering he is coming off a shoulder injury that required season-ending surgery.<\/p>\n Vikings concerned J.J. McCarthy can\u2019t handle the \u2018elemental aspects of being the face of a franchise\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n Vikings second-year signal-caller J.J. McCarthy has struggled with some of the \u201cmore elemental aspects\u201d of the position, and it\u2019s becoming a league-wide talking point, according to The Athletic.<\/p>\n Those issues, plus his uneven play, have the Vikings considering alternative options at the game\u2019s most important position, despite using the No. 10 pick in the 2024 NFL Draft to select the former Michigan star.<\/p>\n Why Dan Orlovsky only likes Kyler Murray for the Vikings<\/a><\/p>\n Orlovsky would speak on ESPN\u2019s \u201cNFL Live\u201d and said that while he likes the fit of Murray in Minnesota, he doesn\u2019t \u201clove it,\u201d expressing that it would have to be a stylistic change for the quarterback to make.<\/p>\n \u201cI like Kyler in Minnesota. I don\u2019t love Kyler in Minnesota,\u201d Orlovsky said. \u201cKyler, in his own words, has said, \u2018I still want to be a playmaker.\u2018 I remember calling Monday Night Football last year and having conversations with Kyler, and how do we get better as an offense? He\u2019s like, \u2018I just\u2026I need the ball in my hands more. I need to go be a playmaker and use my legs more to impact the game.\u2019 That\u2019s not really how this offense is built to be played.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c[O\u2019Connell] wants his quarterback to be the point guard. \u2018I just need you to be average, because everything else is going to be above average.\u2018 And so the question is, \u2018Will Kyler get to that?\u2019 Would he be willing to do that in trying to repair his reputation, because I would tell you, like, talent-wise? No question, give me Kyler over Geno with where they are right now, stylistically, I\u2019d probably tell you, give me Geno over Kyler,\u201d Orlovsky said.<\/p>\n Justin Jefferson Drops Major Hint on Vikings\u2019 Plans at QB<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cJustin Jefferson and Kyler Murray appear to have recently followed each other on Instagram as rumors swirl around the Vikings going after the Cardinals\u2019 now former quarterback,\u201d Evan Sidery reported via X. \u201cMurray reportedly already has a top potential destination in mind, which easily could be Minnesota.\u201d \u2018I don\u2019t know the list is all that long\u2019 \u2014 NFL insider clarifies the Minnesota Vikings\u2019 plans at the quarterback position<\/a><\/p>\n Dan Graziano of ESPN reported in recent days that Murray is firmly on the Vikings\u2019 radar, a report that should have only gained credence since Schefter broke the news of his impending release.<\/p>\n \u201cParticularly if you look at these guys \u2014 Kyler Murray, Geno Smith \u2014 if they get released by their current teams and are available for cheap, for veteran minimum deals, I think that\u2019s the kind of guy the Vikings have in mind,\u201d Graziano said. \u201c[They could] come in and start and would get JJ McCarthy\u2019s attention and would help give them a little more time to evaluate whether JJ McCarthy remains viable for the future without the pressure of having to play and win right now.\u201d<\/p>\n Vikings Get Brutal Take on J.J. McCarthy Amid QB Questions<\/a> Four Veteran QBs Vikings Should Consider This Offseason to Compete With J.J. McCarthy<\/a> This loaded Vikings trade package for CJ Stroud would have to include JJ McCarthy<\/a> Vikings rumor reveals Minnesota is \u2018lurking\u2019 for projected $174 million quarterback<\/a> What I heard about the Vikings\u2019 plans for free agency and interim GM Rob Brzezinski<\/a> Aaron Jones Sr. Gets Strong Chiefs Message Amid Vikings News<\/a> Vikings to move on from veteran DT with ties to Commanders<\/a> Vikings Could Target Heavier WR If Nailor Walks: Who Are the Options?<\/a>
Also on Monday, Matthew Berry of NBC Sports shared a lengthy piece related to \u201cinteresting things he heard\u201d at the combine. Berry left Indianapolis convinced the Vikings are \u201cnot sold\u201d on McCarthy for reasons that go beyond the fact that the signal-caller doesn\u2019t yet know how to be \u201cthe face of a franchise\u201d for a winning organization.<\/p>\n
\u2026
Although Fowler does not believe that the team will take such drastic measures as to release McCarthy with at least two years remaining on his rookie deal, he believes the team has already commenced steps to metaphorically \u2018break up\u2019 with the Michigan alum.<\/p>\n
Bills send pick 91 to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
Bengals send pick 41 to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
Ravens send pick 80 and 2026 fifth-round pick to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
Chargers send pick 86 and a 2027 fifth-round pick to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
Commanders send pick 71 and a 2027 fifth to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard and pick 97<\/p>\n
49ers send Mac Jones and 2026 fourth-round pick to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard and a 2026 fifth-round pick<\/p>\n
Patriots send pick 61 and a 2027 fourth-round pick to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
Colts send Anthony Richardson and a conditional 2027 fifth-round pick to the Vikings for Greenard<\/p>\n
Cowboys send 2027 second-round pick to the Vikings for Jonathan Greenard<\/p>\n
\u2026
Murray\u2019s time with the Arizona Cardinals will officially end on March 11, if not before then, per a recent ESPN report.
\u2026
A trade for Murray now reads as unlikely, particularly with the official news of his pending release. By cutting Murray, the Cardinals have essentially freed him up to sign anywhere he would like and\/or with any team that will have him for the veteran\u2019s league minimum of $1.3 million.<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n