{"id":858852,"date":"2026-04-07T12:17:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-07T12:17:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/858852\/"},"modified":"2026-04-07T12:17:16","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T12:17:16","slug":"how-much-cap-space-remains-for-all-32-nfl-teams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/858852\/","title":{"rendered":"How much cap space remains for all 32 NFL teams"},"content":{"rendered":"

Every NFL<\/a> offseason is shaped as much by the salary cap as it is by talent evaluation, and 2026 is no different. While the league operates under a hard cap system, how teams manage that constraint varies dramatically\u2014some franchises enter the year with abundant flexibility, while others are forced to navigate tight financial margins. Cap space is more than just a number; it represents optionality. It dictates whether a team can aggressively pursue free agents, extend cornerstone players, absorb contracts via trade, or simply maintain roster stability without restructuring deals.<\/p>\n

This year\u2019s cap landscape reveals<\/a> a clear divide across the league. Rebuilding teams like Tennessee and Washington sit atop the rankings with significant financial freedom, positioning themselves to accelerate roster construction. Meanwhile, perennial contenders such as Kansas City and Buffalo continue to operate with tighter margins, relying on disciplined structuring and internal development to sustain success. At the other end of the spectrum, teams like Miami and Chicago face heavy constraints, where prior financial decisions\u2014particularly in the form of dead money\u2014limit immediate flexibility and force a more measured approach.<\/p>\n

RELATED: NFL salary cap space projection for 2026<\/a><\/p>\n

It\u2019s also important to distinguish between raw cap space and effective cap space, as draft picks, injury reserves, and in-season flexibility all impact how much teams can realistically spend. Ultimately, cap management is a reflection of organizational philosophy. Whether a team chooses to spend aggressively, build patiently, or constantly restructure for contention, the 2026 cap table provides a revealing snapshot of where every franchise stands\u2014and where it may be headed next.<\/p>\n

1. Tennessee Titans \u2014 $63,203,086<\/p>\n

\"1.Tennessee Titans quarterback Brandon Allen (10) looks to pass during the first quarter of an NFL football matchup at EverBank Stadium, Sunday, Jan. 4, 2026, in Jacksonville, Fla. Credit: \u00a9 Corey Perrine\/Florida Times-Union \/ USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Tennessee enters 2026 with the league\u2019s most financial flexibility, a direct result of a disciplined reset and targeted roster churn. The hiring of Robert Saleh signals a defensive identity shift, and the front office has preserved optionality to accelerate that transition. Their cap position allows them to be aggressive in both the draft and veteran market without compromising future years. This is a team positioned to pivot quickly from rebuild to competitive relevance if early moves land.<\/p>\n

2. Washington Commanders \u2014 $49,635,067<\/p>\n

\"2.Washington Commanders safety Jeremy Reaves (39) celebrates an interception during the second quarter against the Philadelphia Eagles at Lincoln Financial Field. Credit: Eric Hartline-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Washington\u2019s cap sheet reflects restraint and long-term planning, avoiding the cyclical traps that have historically stalled the franchise. With a young core and flexibility intact, the front office has the bandwidth to extend foundational players while selectively adding impact talent. Their approach suggests a controlled build rather than a short-term push. If executed correctly, this is a roster that can climb steadily without sacrificing sustainability.<\/p>\n

3. Los Angeles Chargers \u2014 $48,679,074<\/p>\n

\"3.Los Angeles Chargers running back Kimani Vidal (30) recovers a fumble from Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert (10) during the third quarter against the New England Patriots in an AFC Wild Card Round game at Gillette Stadium. Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Under Jim Harbaugh, the Chargers are clearly prioritizing structural stability over splash spending. Their cap health gives them leverage to reshape the trenches and reinforce depth\u2014areas that have historically limited their ceiling. Rather than chasing headline signings, the strategy appears rooted in roster balance and physicality. It\u2019s a measured rebuild that aligns with Harbaugh\u2019s long-term blueprint.<\/p>\n

4. Arizona Cardinals \u2014 $40,835,523<\/p>\n

\"4.Arizona Cardinals wide receiver Greg Dortch (4) celebrates after scoring a touchdown during the fourth quarter against the Jacksonville Jaguars at State Farm Stadium. Credit: Joe Camporeale-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Arizona continues to navigate a rebuild anchored around Kyler Murray, balancing flexibility with residual dead money from prior regimes. The cap space gives them room to incrementally upgrade both sides of the ball, particularly along the defensive front and secondary. Their trajectory depends on disciplined allocation rather than urgency. Progress here is more about layering talent than making singular splash moves.<\/p>\n

5. New York Jets \u2014 $39,551,357<\/p>\n

\"5.New York Jets quarterback Justin Fields (7) runs the ball for a touchdown during the first half against the New England Patriots at Gillette Stadium. Credit: Eric Canha-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The Jets\u2019 financial position is healthier than in prior cycles, but a meaningful share of their cap is still tied up in dead money from past quarterback decisions, including Aaron Rodgers, who is no longer with the team. In fact, Rodgers spent 2025 with Pittsburgh, while the Jets entered 2026 with Geno Smith at quarterback and significant dead charges tied to both Rodgers and Justin Fields. That makes New York\u2019s cap flexibility valuable, but not quite as clean as the raw space suggests. The front office\u2019s task is less about managing Rodgers-related uncertainty and more about turning improved financial breathing room into a more stable roster around its current quarterback plan.<\/p>\n

RELATED: 2026 NFL salary cap space rankings by team<\/a><\/p>\n

6. New England Patriots \u2014 $35,274,938<\/p>\n

\"6.New England Patriots quarterback Drake Maye (10) against the Seattle Seahawks during Super Bowl LX at Levi\u2019s Stadium. Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

New England\u2019s cap reset reflects a philosophical shift toward patience and developmental growth. With a young quarterback timeline in focus, resources can be allocated toward infrastructure\u2014offensive line stability, pass-catching depth, and defensive continuity. The absence of major financial constraints gives the front office room to build methodically. This is less about immediate contention and more about constructing a durable foundation.<\/p>\n

7. Philadelphia Eagles \u2014 $34,830,735<\/p>\n

\"7.Philadelphia Eagles defensive tackle Jordan Davis (90) during player introductions against the Las Vegas Raiders at Lincoln Financial Field. Credit: Eric Hartline-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Philadelphia continues to demonstrate elite cap management, maintaining flexibility despite a star-heavy roster. Around Jalen Hurts, the organization has balanced extensions with forward-planned restructures. This space allows for targeted reinforcements without disrupting the championship window. Few teams sustain contention with this level of financial control.<\/p>\n

8. Seattle Seahawks \u2014 $32,947,183<\/p>\n

\"8.Seattle Seahawks quarterback Sam Darnold (14) hands off to running back George Holani (36) during the first quarter against the New England Patriots in Super Bowl LX at Levi\u2019s Stadium. Credit: Darren Yamashita-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

As defending champions, Seattle pairs elite on-field performance with one of the cleanest cap sheets in the league. Minimal dead money provides unusual freedom for a title team, enabling both retention and strategic additions. The front office now operates from a position of strength rather than necessity. Sustaining contention will hinge on disciplined extensions rather than reactive spending.<\/p>\n

9. San Francisco 49ers \u2014 $30,539,247<\/p>\n

\"9.San Francisco 49ers offensive tackle Trent Williams (left) greets head coach Kyle Shanahan (right) before the game against the Jacksonville Jaguars at Levi\u2019s Stadium. Credit: Darren Yamashita-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

San Francisco remains firmly in a win-now window, managing a high-end roster through careful cap engineering. Even with multiple premium contracts, they\u2019ve preserved enough space to maintain depth and absorb injuries. The priority here is continuity rather than overhaul. Their challenge is extending the window without triggering a future cap squeeze.<\/p>\n

10. Baltimore Ravens \u2014 $29,539,010<\/p>\n

\"10.Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson (8) runs the ball against the Pittsburgh Steelers during the second quarter at Acrisure Stadium. Credit: Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Baltimore\u2019s cap structure reflects calculated aggression, centered around Lamar Jackson and reinforced by the addition of Derrick Henry. The team continues to invest in physical identity while preserving enough flexibility to address defensive depth. This is a roster built for postseason football. The window remains open as long as core pieces stay intact.<\/p>\n

11. Pittsburgh Steelers \u2014 $27,051,445<\/p>\n

\"11.Pittsburgh Steelers defensive tackle Cameron Heyward (97) warms up for a game against the Buffalo Bills at Acrisure Stadium. Credit: Barry Reeger-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Pittsburgh\u2019s cap position provides stability amid ongoing quarterback uncertainty. The organization has avoided extreme financial swings, allowing them to remain competitive year over year. Flexibility here supports incremental upgrades rather than wholesale changes. It\u2019s a continuation of the franchise\u2019s historically conservative roster-building model.<\/p>\n

12. Indianapolis Colts \u2014 $26,627,200<\/p>\n

\"12.Indianapolis Colts quarterback Anthony Richardson (5) hands off the ball Sunday, Oct. 5, 2025, during a game against the Las Vegas Raiders at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. The Indianapolis Colts defeated the Las Vegas Raiders, 40-6. Credit: \u00a9 Grace Smith\/IndyStar \/ USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The Colts\u2019 financial outlook aligns with their developmental timeline around Anthony Richardson. With resources available, the focus will be on protecting the quarterback and strengthening the defensive front. This is a roster still in its formative stage but trending upward. Cap flexibility gives them margin for error as they refine the core.<\/p>\n

13. Los Angeles Rams \u2014 $26,014,238<\/p>\n

\"13.Los Angeles Rams wide receiver Puka Nacua (12) reacts against the Carolina Panthers in the second half during the NFC Wild Card Round game at Bank of America Stadium. Credit: Bob Donnan-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The Rams continue to operate with calculated flexibility despite years of aggressive roster construction. Sean McVay has overseen a transition toward younger, cost-controlled contributors without sacrificing competitiveness. Their cap position supports selective veteran additions. It\u2019s a recalibration rather than a rebuild.<\/p>\n

14. Detroit Lions \u2014 $23,688,750<\/p>\n

\"14.Detroit Lions running back David Montgomery (5) celebrates a touchdown against Minnesota Vikings with running back Jahmyr Gibbs (0) during the first half at Ford Field in Detroit on Sunday, November 2, 2025. Credit: \u00a9 Junfu Han \/ USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Detroit\u2019s rise is supported by a balanced cap structure that allows them to retain emerging talent. With a strong cultural foundation under Dan Campbell, resources can be used to reinforce rather than overhaul. The team is transitioning from ascender to contender. Maintaining that trajectory will require disciplined extensions.<\/p>\n

15. Las Vegas Raiders \u2014 $23,472,186<\/p>\n

\"15.Las Vegas Raiders defensive end Maxx Crosby (98) reacts after a tackle against the Los Angeles Chargers during the second half at SoFi Stadium. Credit: Kiyoshi Mio-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The Raiders sit in a flexible but uncertain position, with roster direction still evolving. Cap space provides optionality as they evaluate long-term solutions at key positions. The challenge will be aligning personnel decisions with a clear identity. Without that clarity, flexibility alone won\u2019t translate into progress.<\/p>\n

RELATED: Biggest dead cap hits in NFL history<\/a><\/p>\n

16. Green Bay Packers \u2014 $22,015,250<\/p>\n

\"16.Green Bay Packers running back Emanuel Wilson (23) loses 18-yards on a run against the Minnesota Vikings during the game at U.S. Bank Stadium. Credit: Dan Powers-USA TODAY Network via Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Green Bay\u2019s cap health supports its transition into a younger era around Jordan Love. The organization has managed its books well enough to extend core players while maintaining depth. This is a team balancing development with competitiveness. Their window depends on continued internal growth.<\/p>\n

17. Cleveland Browns \u2014 $21,069,505<\/p>\n

\"17.Cleveland Browns tight end David Njoku (85) and guard Joel Bitonio (75) run out for player introductions prior to a game against the Baltimore Ravens at Huntington Bank Field. Credit: Ken Blaze-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Cleveland continues to operate under significant dead-cap pressure, limiting true flexibility despite moderate cap space. The front office must navigate around prior financial commitments while maintaining roster competitiveness. This creates a narrower margin for error. Strategic efficiency is critical in this environment.<\/p>\n

18. Cincinnati Bengals \u2014 $20,368,396<\/p>\n

\"18.Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow (9) warms up before a game against the Arizona Cardinals at Paycor Stadium. Credit: Katie Stratman-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

With Joe Burrow as the centerpiece, Cincinnati\u2019s cap strategy revolves around sustaining a high-end offensive core. Flexibility remains, but future extensions will tighten margins. The team is firmly in a win-now phase. Resource allocation must prioritize protection and playmaking.<\/p>\n

19. Denver Broncos \u2014 $18,782,088<\/p>\n

\"19.Denver Broncos running back J.K. Dobbins receives a hand off from quarterback Bo Nix. Credit: Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Denver\u2019s cap situation reflects ongoing recalibration under Sean Payton. With a developing quarterback in Bo Nix, resources are being directed toward structural stability. The rebuild is still in progress but trending toward sustainability. Cap discipline is central to that shift.<\/p>\n

20. Houston Texans \u2014 $15,356,292<\/p>\n

\"20.Houston Texans defensive end Will Anderson Jr. (51) reacts after a sack in the second quarter against the New England Patriots in an AFC Divisional Round game at Gillette Stadium. Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Houston\u2019s ascent is fueled by the rookie-window advantage around C.J. Stroud. Even with rising expectations, the team retains enough flexibility to reinforce key areas. This is a roster moving from opportunistic to intentional contention. The next phase will test their ability to sustain success.<\/p>\n

21. Dallas Cowboys \u2014 $14,424,454<\/p>\n

\"21.Dallas Cowboys wide receiver George Pickens (3) warms up before a game against the Minnesota Vikings at AT&T Stadium. Credit: Kevin Jairaj-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Dallas remains constrained by top-heavy contracts, particularly around Dak Prescott. While workable, the cap situation requires continual restructuring. This limits spontaneity in roster building. The margin between contention and regression is thinner than it appears.<\/p>\n

22. Tampa Bay Buccaneers \u2014 $14,314,627<\/p>\n

\"22.Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans (13) reacts after a touchdown during the first half against the Carolina Panthers at Bank of America Stadium. Credit: Bob Donnan-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Tampa Bay has stabilized its cap following prior all-in pushes, creating modest flexibility. With Baker Mayfield reestablishing himself, the roster is competitive but not fully complete. The team must balance retention with targeted upgrades. Incremental improvement is the likely path.<\/p>\n

23. Atlanta Falcons \u2014 $14,013,085<\/p>\n

\"23.Atlanta Falcons tight end Kyle Pitts Sr. (8) celebrates with running back Bijan Robinson (7) after scoring a touchdown against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers during the second quarter at Raymond James Stadium. Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Atlanta\u2019s cap position supports a dual-track approach, investing in the present while developing future options at quarterback. With Kirk Cousins and Michael Penix Jr., flexibility is critical. The roster has upside but requires cohesion. Execution will determine ceiling.<\/p>\n

24. New Orleans Saints \u2014 $13,897,399<\/p>\n

\"24.New Orleans Saints wide receiver Ronnie Bell (85) catches a pass for a touchdown against the Atlanta Falcons in the fourth quarter at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Credit: Brett Davis-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

New Orleans continues to operate under one of the league\u2019s most aggressive cap structures. Heavy dead money constrains flexibility, forcing reliance on restructures and short-term maneuvering. While competitiveness is maintained, long-term sustainability remains a concern. This is a balancing act that grows tighter each year.<\/p>\n

25. Buffalo Bills \u2014 $12,291,157<\/p>\n

\"25.Buffalo Bills quarterback Josh Allen (17) celebrates with Buffalo Bills center Will Clapp (77) and Buffalo Bills tight end Dawson Knox (88) after scoring a touchdown during the second quarter against the Baltimore Ravens in a 2025 AFC divisional round game at Highmark Stadium. Credit: Gregory Fisher-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Buffalo\u2019s cap strategy centers on maximizing the prime years of Josh Allen. While space is limited, the roster remains strong enough to contend. The challenge lies in maintaining depth under tighter constraints. Precision becomes more important than volume.<\/p>\n

26. Kansas City Chiefs \u2014 $6,717,066<\/p>\n

\"26.Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce (87) celebrates after catching a run during the first quarter at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium. Credit: Denny Medley-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Kansas City operates with minimal margin, a byproduct of sustained success around Patrick Mahomes. The front office consistently offsets constraints through creative structuring. Despite limited space, the competitive window remains firmly open. Efficiency defines their approach.<\/p>\n

27. New York Giants \u2014 $6,490,862<\/p>\n

\"27.New York Giants wide receiver Gunner Olszewski (80) throws a pass during the fourth quarter against the Dallas Cowboys at MetLife Stadium. Credit: Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The Giants\u2019 cap situation reflects transitional uncertainty, particularly at quarterback. Limited flexibility restricts aggressive roster moves. The organization must prioritize clarity in direction. Without it, cap space alone won\u2019t drive progress.<\/p>\n

28. Jacksonville Jaguars \u2014 $5,989,907<\/p>\n

\"28.Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Trevor Lawrence (16) fakes the hands off to running back Travis Etienne Jr. (1) during the fourth quarter of an NFL football AFC Wild Card playoff matchup, Sunday, Jan. 11, 2026, in Jacksonville, Fla. The Bills defeated the Jaguars 27-24. Credit: \u00a9 Corey Perrine\/Florida Times-Union \/ USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Jacksonville\u2019s cap profile tightens as investments around Trevor Lawrence mature. The team remains competitive but has less room for error. Strategic additions must be precise. This is a shift from building to sustaining.<\/p>\n

29. Minnesota Vikings \u2014 $4,826,234<\/p>\n

\"29.Minnesota Vikings nose tackle Javon Hargrave (97) reacts against the Washington Commanders during the second half at U.S. Bank Stadium. Credit: Brad Rempel-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Minnesota\u2019s limited space reflects a roster in transition, particularly at quarterback. Flexibility is constrained, requiring careful prioritization of resources. The team must align financial decisions with its long-term plan. Short-term fixes are less viable in this context.<\/p>\n

RELATED: Top 10 NFL backup quarterbacks<\/a><\/p>\n

30. Carolina Panthers \u2014 $2,210,496<\/p>\n

\"30.Carolina Panthers quarterback Bryce Young (9) reacts in the fourth quarter in an NFC Wild Card Round game at Bank of America Stadium. Credit: Bob Donnan-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Carolina\u2019s cap situation leaves little room for error as it continues to build around Bryce Young. With minimal flexibility, development must come internally. External additions will be limited and targeted. Patience is essential.<\/p>\n

31. Miami Dolphins \u2014 $1,933,064<\/p>\n

\"31.Miami Dolphins wide receiver Jaylen Waddle (17) reacts after a play against the Washington Commanders in the third quarter during the 2025 NFL Madrid Game at Santiago Bernabeu Stadium. Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Miami faces one of the league\u2019s most restrictive cap environments, driven by significant dead money. Despite a talented core led by Tua Tagovailoa, flexibility is severely limited. The team must rely on internal development and strategic restructuring. Contention is possible, but margin is thin.<\/p>\n

32. Chicago Bears \u2014 $243,078<\/p>\n

\"32.Chicago Bears tight end Cole Kmet (85) celebrates with wide receiver Olamide Zaccheaus (14) after catching a fourteen-yard touchdown pass against the Los Angeles Rams with eighteen seconds remaining in the fourth quarter of an NFC Divisional Round game at Soldier Field. Credit: David Banks-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

Chicago enters the season with virtually no cap cushion, limiting immediate roster maneuverability. With Caleb Williams as the focal point, development must occur within existing constraints. Future flexibility will depend on disciplined financial management. This is a transitional phase with long-term implications.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/p>\n

\"Conclusion\"Large helmets of the Green Bay Packers, Detroit Lions, Chicago Beras, Washington Commanders and Philadelphia Eagles at the NFL Scouting Combine at Lucas Oil Stadium. Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images<\/p>\n

The 2026 salary cap landscape highlights how differently teams approach roster building under the same financial rules. Some franchises are positioned to be aggressive and reshape their futures quickly, while others must rely on precision and internal growth to remain competitive. In the end, cap space isn\u2019t just about how much you have\u2014it\u2019s about how effectively you use it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Every NFL offseason is shaped as much by the salary cap as it is by talent evaluation, and…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":858853,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2064],"tags":[390,254,117,53,260,241,391,256,54,257,258,113,7,345,253,392,125,110,393,1014,262,58,2444,2443,251,259,249,55,56,255,6,109,57,252,261,250,394,111],"class_list":{"0":"post-858852","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-los-angeles-chargers","8":"tag-arizona-cardinals","9":"tag-atlanta-falcons","10":"tag-baltimore-ravens","11":"tag-buffalo-bills","12":"tag-carolina-panthers","13":"tag-chargers","14":"tag-chicago-bears","15":"tag-cincinnati-bengals","16":"tag-cleveland-browns","17":"tag-dallas-cowboys","18":"tag-denver-broncos","19":"tag-detroit-lions","20":"tag-football","21":"tag-green-bay-packers","22":"tag-houston-texans","23":"tag-indianapolis-colts","24":"tag-jacksonville-jaguars","25":"tag-kansas-city-chiefs","26":"tag-las-vegas-raiders","27":"tag-los-angeles","28":"tag-los-angeles-chargers","29":"tag-los-angeles-rams","30":"tag-losangeles","31":"tag-losangeleschargers","32":"tag-miami-dolphins","33":"tag-minnesota-vikings","34":"tag-new-england-patriots","35":"tag-new-orleans-saints","36":"tag-new-york-giants","37":"tag-new-york-jets","38":"tag-nfl","39":"tag-philadelphia-eagles","40":"tag-pittsburgh-steelers","41":"tag-san-francisco-49ers","42":"tag-seattle-seahawks","43":"tag-tampa-bay-buccaneers","44":"tag-tennessee-titans","45":"tag-washington-commanders"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/858852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=858852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/858852\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/858853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=858852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=858852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=858852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}