{"id":860890,"date":"2026-04-08T12:42:17","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T12:42:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/860890\/"},"modified":"2026-04-08T12:42:17","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T12:42:17","slug":"should-the-cincinnati-bengals-trade-back-mock-draft-paths-illustrate-value","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/860890\/","title":{"rendered":"Should the Cincinnati Bengals trade back? Mock draft paths illustrate value"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When Daniel Jeremiah and Mina Kimes were doing a recent mock draft podcast, the idea of the Cincinnati Bengals trading back in the first round was brought up as an option.<\/p>\n<p>Jeremiah, without skipping a beat, offered a perfect encapsulation of how the rest of the league views Cincinnati on draft weekend.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAre we confirmed the Bengals have a draft phone?\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s the reality. In a league dominated on draft weekend by movement and repositioning, the Bengals accept the role of the tortoise versus the hare.<\/p>\n<p>There have been 64 trades over the last two years on draft weekend. The Bengals have made none.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ve opted to stick and pick rather than consummate a deal on 21 straight selections dating to third-rounder Jordan Battle in 2023. In that trade, they moved back three spots in exchange for a sixth-round pick.<\/p>\n<p>Three years, one trade for three spots.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to the Bengals\u2019 lack of trades, that\u2019s not even the most mind-blowing fact.<\/p>\n<p>The Bengals have not moved up in the first round since going from No. 5 to No. 1 to draft running back Ki-Jana Carter in 1995. Carter is now 52 years old.<\/p>\n<p>They have moved up in the second round only one time since 1995, jumping three spots in 2022 to select cornerback Cam Taylor-Britt.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the list. The Bengals philosophically desire to collect picks, not dispense them. Like in many organizational areas, they act conservatively, not aggressively.<\/p>\n<p>Even when it comes to moving back, de facto general manager Duke Tobin and president Mike Brown rarely move in the first round. The Bengals have moved back in the first round just three times since 1995.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 2004: From 17 to 24 and 24 to 26, selecting RB Chris Perry<br \/>\u2022 2012: From 21 to 27, selecting G Kevin Zeitler<br \/>\u2022 2018: Pre-draft, moved from 12 to 21 in exchange for OT Cordy Glenn<\/p>\n<p>All this serves as important background when analyzing how the Bengals could best make this draft work with a notable collection of needs across the roster. Specifically, they need to check four positional boxes with potential answers at some point in the draft: corner, linebacker, pass rusher, swing tackle.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a snapshot of a draft that takes advantage of top players at positions of need being available in each of the first two rounds.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 1 (10): Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State<br \/>\u2022 2 (41): Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas<br \/>\u2022 3 (72): Markel Bell, OT, Miami<br \/>\u2022 4 (110): Jaishawn Barham, Edge, Michigan<\/p>\n<p>The easiest way to add draft capital would involve moving back from No. 10. The challenge this year would be finding a team willing to move up in the first round of a draft defined by a lack of blue-chip prospects.<\/p>\n<p>Where the Bengals could be well-positioned for the phone to ring involves the teams behind them vying to fill needs at the top of the next tier of receivers and cornerbacks. If the top-tier players on the Bengals\u2019 big board of defensive options are gone \u2014 and that\u2019s certainly possible \u2014 it would be easy to see them feeling they could draft the same level of player a few spots back while adding another pick in the heart of the draft.<\/p>\n<p>The Dolphins (No. 11) and Cowboys (No. 12) both will be hunting for defensive players. The Dolphins are also deep in the receiver market after moving on from Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle as a new staff revamps the roster. Then, there are the Rams (No. 13) in win-now mode and looking for new answers at receiver for Matthew Stafford. You could even see a phone call from Tampa Bay at No. 15 for a cornerback or receiver as the Buccaneers look to replenish both positions. There\u2019s also the possibility of a Jeremiyah Love slide that could get teams calling Cincinnati at No. 10.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the reason, a move back here would make sense in multiple ways.<\/p>\n<p>As for compensation, recent history shows a variance on return, with anywhere from the equivalent of a second-round pick to a fourth, depending on the spot in Round 1.<\/p>\n<p>Where the Bengals sit, they would project to land a third-round pick for moving back with the group directly behind them, based on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drafttek.com\/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Rich Hill Model draft board<\/a> and collection of recent first-round swaps.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take a look at a mock draft through the first five rounds with an additional third-round pick and trade back with the Rams (the Bengals also have two picks in the sixth round and two picks in the seventh round, but we\u2019ll keep those outside the discussion).<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 1 (13): Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee<br \/>\u2022 2 (41): Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas<br \/>\u2022 3 (72): Markel Bell, OT, Miami<br \/>\u2022 3 (93 from LAR): Dani Dennis-Sutton, Edge, Penn State<br \/>\u2022 4 (110): Connor Lew, C, Auburn<\/p>\n<p>Adding the pick would give the Bengals one of the top corners in the draft while allowing them to grab a higher-quality edge rusher and hit the backup center conversation before the candidates are picked over. It\u2019s a long way from No. 110 to their next pick at 189 in the sixth round.<\/p>\n<p>With this haul in mind, let\u2019s add in one more move you could see the Bengals make. The Bengals have slowed on what used to be their No. 1 draft weekend move. The Bengals moved back in the second round and added picks four times from 2017 to \u201921.<\/p>\n<p>There were opportunities the past two years to move back, but Cincinnati felt motivated to snag Kris Jenkins and Demetrius Knight Jr. rather than jeopardize missing out by moving back. That was particularly surprising with Knight, but remaking the linebacker room was such a high priority that the Bengals just picked the player they liked.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the strength of this draft lies between the 40th and 75th picks, where teams will be getting a similar-level player throughout that range. If that\u2019s the case, the Bengals could be a candidate to slip back, potentially add a fourth or fifth to check off more boxes without really losing out on much.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take a look at what a trade back in the second round could mean. In each of the second-round trades the Bengals made, they never went back more than 10 spots. Under that assumption, a move back would warrant a fourth- or fifth-rounder.<\/p>\n<p>In this scenario, they move back with the Falcons seven spots, and that equates to a fourth-round pick, Atlanta\u2019s No. 122.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s that full mock draft:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 1 (13): Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee<br \/>\u2022 2 (48): Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati<br \/>\u2022 3 (72): Markel Bell, OT, Miami<br \/>\u2022 3 (93 from Rams): Dani Dennis-Sutton, Edge, Penn State<br \/>\u2022 4 (110): Connor Lew, OC, Auburn<br \/>\u2022 4 (122 from Falcons): Nick Barrett, DT, South Carolina<\/p>\n<p>There are four potential swing tackles available beyond a clear top seven who figure to fly off the board in the top 40 picks before the Bengals select. Those are Florida\u2019s Austin Barber, Northwestern\u2019s Caleb Tiernan, Miami\u2019s Markel Bell and Iowa\u2019s Gennings Dunker.<\/p>\n<p>Adding picks in the third and fourth rounds greatly increases the likelihood the Bengals can land one of them to help secure depth behind starters Orlando Brown Jr. and Amarius Mims. That will prove a critical aspect of Day 2 for the Bengals. It also keeps the third-round edge rusher in play under the assumption they don\u2019t go for one with the first two picks.<\/p>\n<p>The addition of a fourth-round pick opens up a wealth of options, including an aggressive run at adding a receiver such as Georgia State\u2019s Ted Hurst rather than waiting until the sixth round. In this case, however, it offers up a chance to keep taking shots at improving the pass rush with Barrett, who specialized in rushing the quarterback in the SEC.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7179435 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/USATSI_28346975-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"South Carolina defensive lineman Nick Barrett (DL03) during the NFL Scouting Combine at Lucas Oil Stadium. \" width=\"2560\" height=\"1707\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>\n      South Carolina\u2019s Nick Barrett could be a possible Day 3 option for the Bengals. (Kirby Lee \/ Imagn Images)<\/p>\n<p>The difference between the trade-back draft and the stick-and-pick is notable. If players like Downs or Hill are not there, the idea of focusing on quantity over quality could become an enticing option.<\/p>\n<p>If the current trend is to serve as a judge, both scenarios will prove moot, with the Bengals adding to the 21 consecutive selections without moving. We\u2019ll see if the draft phone is functional this go-around.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"When Daniel Jeremiah and Mina Kimes were doing a recent mock draft podcast, the idea of the Cincinnati&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":860891,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5],"tags":[256,7,49,48],"class_list":{"0":"post-860890","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ncaa-football","8":"tag-cincinnati-bengals","9":"tag-football","10":"tag-ncaa","11":"tag-ncaa-football"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/channels.im\/@nfl\/116369146515262100","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/860890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=860890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/860890\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/860891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=860890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=860890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rawchili.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=860890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}