The contentious saga between veteran forward Ryan Johansen and the Philadelphia Flyers has reached a definitive conclusion. An independent arbitrator has ruled in favor of the Flyers regarding the termination of Johansen’s contract, a decision that absolves the team of any financial liability and sets a significant new precedent for the league.

The conflict began after the Colorado Avalanche traded Johansen to Philadelphia. Almost immediately, Johansen informed the Flyers he was physically unable to play for the team. This led to widespread speculation that the ‘injury’ was a way for the forward to avoid playing for head coach John Tortorella, given their notoriously strained relationship from their time together in Columbus.

In August of last year, the Flyers officially terminated Johansen’s contract. In an effort to fight the termination, Johansen and the NHLPA filed a grievance, claiming a material breach by the team and asserting that the player required significant surgeries.

The NHLPA has filed a grievance on behalf of Ryan Johansen regarding the Philadelphia Flyers’ decision to terminate his contract.

— NHLPA (@NHLPA) September 26, 2024

After nearly a year, the arbitrator’s decision was revealed today. NHL insider Darren Dreger was the first to report the verdict, which sided entirely with the Flyers.

Sources say an arbitrator has ruled in favour of the Philadelphia Flyers in a grievance filed by the NHLPA following the termination of Ryan Johansen’s contract in August, 2024. The Flyers cited a “material breach” as grounds for termination.

— Darren Dreger (@DarrenDreger) August 12, 2025

This ruling clears the Flyers of any wrongdoing and frees them from any financial repercussions, including potential cap recapture penalties. Johansen will remain an unrestricted free agent, with his future in the league highly uncertain.

More importantly, this decision paves the way for a new standard in the NHL. It may empower teams to more confidently handle similar situations in the future. If a player is perceived to be using an injury claim to avoid reporting to a team, clubs now have a powerful precedent to terminate the contract without fear of reprisal. For players and the NHLPA, this outcome establishes a new benchmark that they may seek to challenge in future negotiations.

While the saga is now over, its effects on league-wide contract disputes are likely just beginning.