Am i crazy for thinking this is a good trade for everyone involved…. also espn doesn’t allow it but this would include 2 lakers picks to indiana and 2 Celtics picks to Brooklyn.
August 19, 2022
Am i crazy for thinking this is a good trade for everyone involved…. also espn doesn’t allow it but this would include 2 lakers picks to indiana and 2 Celtics picks to Brooklyn.
10 comments
Brooklyn would want more picks
This is a really good trade idea but Pacers and Brooklyn specially gonna want more picks
Honestly it’s really not a bad trade for all involved normally these posts are cringe. With that said nets gonna want more picks.
These are just 2 separate trades. The first is a KD to Celtics trade that’s been proposed before, but the Nets don’t want because they want either Marcus Smart or Rob Williams included in it (and potentially more than just 2 picks)
The 2nd is a 3-way trade with the Lakers, Pacers, and Nets that the Nets won’t do because they don’t care for Buddy Hield. It’s the same reason why the Lakers aren’t willing to trade both picks in the Indy deal – Hield’s contract is simply not a positive asset, but the Pacers want to charge the Lakers tax for it.
Yikes
Nets don’t get enough here.
Not for both KD and Kyrie..
Can you imagine if that was the return lakers got for lebron and ad? Not the same but u get my point .
Nets probably don’t want to give up Kyrie + Harris for Hield + Turner.
Remove Harris and it’d make more sense. Pacers get 2 firsts from us, Nets get Hield/Turner for Kyrie since they’d rather have “win-now” players than our 2 firsts.
So we are basically getting Westbrook for Kyrie and Joe Harris straight while both our picks go to accruing Hield and Turner. This is so stupid.
First off, we should *NOT* offer India both our picks. If anything, both picks go to BKN
Hire this man to the front office Jeanine!
Pacers give up Hield and Turner just so they can spend 30 million to buy out Westbrook? In what reality would they want to do that?
10 comments
Brooklyn would want more picks
This is a really good trade idea but Pacers and Brooklyn specially gonna want more picks
Honestly it’s really not a bad trade for all involved normally these posts are cringe. With that said nets gonna want more picks.
These are just 2 separate trades. The first is a KD to Celtics trade that’s been proposed before, but the Nets don’t want because they want either Marcus Smart or Rob Williams included in it (and potentially more than just 2 picks)
The 2nd is a 3-way trade with the Lakers, Pacers, and Nets that the Nets won’t do because they don’t care for Buddy Hield. It’s the same reason why the Lakers aren’t willing to trade both picks in the Indy deal – Hield’s contract is simply not a positive asset, but the Pacers want to charge the Lakers tax for it.
Yikes
Nets don’t get enough here.
Not for both KD and Kyrie..
Can you imagine if that was the return lakers got for lebron and ad? Not the same but u get my point .
Nets probably don’t want to give up Kyrie + Harris for Hield + Turner.
Remove Harris and it’d make more sense. Pacers get 2 firsts from us, Nets get Hield/Turner for Kyrie since they’d rather have “win-now” players than our 2 firsts.
So we are basically getting Westbrook for Kyrie and Joe Harris straight while both our picks go to accruing Hield and Turner. This is so stupid.
First off, we should *NOT* offer India both our picks. If anything, both picks go to BKN
Hire this man to the front office Jeanine!
Pacers give up Hield and Turner just so they can spend 30 million to buy out Westbrook? In what reality would they want to do that?