REPORT: The Lakers were unwilling to offer Kyrie Irving a long-term, guaranteed contract in the offseason.


REPORT: The Lakers were unwilling to offer Kyrie Irving a long-term, guaranteed contract in the offseason.

35 comments
  1. Yes. We would give our future picks and not give him a long contract. I totally believe in this report. Swear.

  2. Yeah…because they literally couldnt. If he opted out most they could offer was a vet min or MLE lol.

  3. I think the Lakers were only willing to give up a first round pick from the initial conversations which leads me to believe they were still skeptical of him and may have been willing to sign him for a 2-3 year type of deal only.

    Now I don’t think any team would even do a 3 year deal with Kyrie. 2 at most this off-season. Lakers may still be looking that direction 2/60M but with conditions.

  4. ![gif](giphy|iiQSTrHtDIgnw9YtlA|downsized)

    The best report is the one you make up and publish at the right time for clicks.

  5. Doesn’t matter. All that matters is he didn’t come here and never will now. Bullet sloppily but effectively dodged.

  6. I’ve been a lakers fan for 30+ years. If they sign this fucking chump I will need to boycott

  7. ” We were going to trade for Kyrie but he turned out to be crazy so now we will keep Westbrook and let the season play out. At least we tried…”

    -Jeanie

  8. Personally ion think that this team every had a chance at Kyrie. Most of the offseason was wasted spent day dreaming over him.

  9. Kyrie is crazy, but let’s all admit he can play ball. His stats speak for themselves. LBJ would keep him in line.

  10. Oh please. Lakers management trying to save face here, we all know they would have given anything for Kyrie at that time.

Leave a Reply