This is somehow interference…? I have no clue how.

25 comments

1. 

   Huh??? I’m so confused. Wtf refs…

2. The first of two interference calls that made zero sense.

3. Make-up calls

4. Horseshit call for sure

5. At this point the defender is purposefully running into Cale to get a call.

6. Should’ve called Burg Simpson.

   Good lawyers. Changing lives.

7. Spoiler alert: it isn’t

8. So stupid Cale does intentionally take his ice, but he’s allowed to. He does nothing to initiate contact , he just…glides there

9. It’s a make up call for sure. Everyone knew it was gonna happen. Just sucks they picked THAT to make it up on.

10. That’s probably the 3rd time he has been called for that this year. It would be nice if the league explained themselves once in a while.

11. That one lost the game for us… such fucking bullshit. I’m still mad.

12. Those get called all the time. It’s a pick play, I have no problem with it.

13. This is a pick play. Right call.

14. The defender going backwards towards his own zone has “a right of way” so to speak. Attacking players responsibility to avoid contact there. Good call.

15. This was bad and the goal that was called back was bad. Shitty night for the refs.

16. You know it’s bad if Cale is getting heated over it.

17. This is a penalty and Cale has received it in this exact situation a few times.

    Likely the same refs have seen it a few times as the game pregresses and decide to call it after seeing it be a set pattern. Watch our powerplay, when Cale swings it back to Mack, he almost always cuts at centre with Cale blocking the defenders lane. I see everyone in here saying it’s a penalty being downvoted hard but it makes sense at the pro level for refs to catch onto a set exploit.

18. BS

19. Refs made a lot of money last night.

20. Non-biased non-colorado fan opinion here. There was a game earlier this season where a player was penalized because another dude skated backwards into him while defending the rush, very similar except there was no movement from the penalized player like there was from Makar here. Even though there was no movement the player was still penalized for taking up someone else’s ice when they could have moved.

    It makes sense to me and given that call I understand this one, especially because Makar is moving, even if he may interfere accidentally. OTOH, if they had let this one go I don’t think anyone would have complained so idk.

21. Cales been called for this multiple times over the years now. Have to adjust.

22. Poopy

23. bro 💀

24. Simple answer: It isn’t

25. Yea what a joke. I hate refs sometimes