Why did super bowl 35 have much better video quality than super 36?


Why did super bowl 35 have much better video quality than super 36?

17 comments
  1. Transition from tape to shitty low quality digital. Early 2000s sports are unwatchable and can’t be optimized

  2. Man this patriots team was good. Didn’t vinitieri throw a TD pass in this one too?

  3. CBS used better cameras than Fox during a time when tech was constantly changing for both better and worse

  4. Pretty sure you’re watching the HD broadcast of SB 35 here. I bet the SD version looks a lot like SB 36, similar to most video captured from this era.

  5. The 35 copy looks like an HD version.

    36 looks like a SD version

    SB34 was the first to be broadcast in HD.

  6. Given the difference in aspect ratio, it seems 35 was the HD broadcast and 36 was SD.

    Edit: it pains me to know that there is an entire generation that has no idea this was a thing or how much of an impact it had.

  7. SB XXXV was in Tampa and was the first SB broadcast in HD. Many consumers did not have HD capable TVs (additionally many smaller broadcast affiliates didn’t have the proper equipment to transmit in HD) so Broadcasters supplied both an HD and an SD broadcast of the game.

    This is similar the dual 4k / HD broadcasts we currently see, but much more dramatic shift imo.

  8. CBS had 2 separate feeds apparently. Wiki article lists 2 different sets of announcers between SD and HD feeds. Fox only had SD.

  9. CBS was the first major station to go 1080p – not sure if thats related to the situation but it was a big deal around 2005-2007

Leave a Reply