What a joke. They should be able to go back after a call and change their decision
Why all this work and effort when there is a clear as day top down shot of the goal?
I don’t think the nhl has such advanced technology as adjusting contrast
but but my favorite twitter hockey commentator said this was the PaRaLaX eFfEcT
Fuck these zebras.
If only we had the TSN 5G view!
But that was after he hit the goalie pad. That wasn’t a continuation of his original shot.
NHL needs goal line technology for reviews that synchs with the whistle. And I say this understanding that it can go both ways
I’m a video editor and colorist. If you even have a rudimentary understanding of pixilation you know that puck is across.
In my parallel world the leafs won the cup.
Devils fan here. That was definitely a goal. You guys got robbed. And that delay of game penalty in OT was kinda shady. It shouldn’t take the refs to huddle up for a few minutes to figure out if anybody saw the penalty.
That being said….wanted to address the elephant in the room. Throwing stuff on the ice after a disallowed goal??? Your fanbase gave us a ton of crap for that. Just saying
As stated on broadcast, toronto situation room said the pushing of the pad negated the goal even if they consider this across the line.
I said otherwise in the GDT thread but in my defense, Sportsnet couldn’t draw up this angle.
100% a good goal. But I guess it’s in keeping with last year’s trend 😪
I think we need to go deeper.
Puck passed the line but after the play was dead, I don’t understand what the controversy is
I have to agree with Friedman about utilizing available technology to take the guess out. But it’s so much harder to fix things when there’s a definitive answer.
This league is a joke
Bruh
They never showed this angle once on CBC. They kept showing the angle from inside the net and over top. The whole time I kept saying, “why don’t we get a look from in front of the net?”
Remember when tampas goal counted that wasn’t in
ENHANCE!
Doesn’t matter now buddy. This is just going to infuriate yourself. This sucks but it’s over
Flames fan here.Sad what happened today. I did want the leafs to go far this year and was cheering for them.
Welcome to 2004 for the flames. It was in
At least this had some rationale to it being a no-goal. But the puck over glass penalty in overtime? What glass? Really baffled me.
24 comments
What a joke. They should be able to go back after a call and change their decision
Why all this work and effort when there is a clear as day top down shot of the goal?
I don’t think the nhl has such advanced technology as adjusting contrast
but but my favorite twitter hockey commentator said this was the PaRaLaX eFfEcT
Fuck these zebras.
If only we had the TSN 5G view!
But that was after he hit the goalie pad. That wasn’t a continuation of his original shot.
NHL needs goal line technology for reviews that synchs with the whistle. And I say this understanding that it can go both ways
I’m a video editor and colorist. If you even have a rudimentary understanding of pixilation you know that puck is across.
In my parallel world the leafs won the cup.
Devils fan here. That was definitely a goal. You guys got robbed. And that delay of game penalty in OT was kinda shady. It shouldn’t take the refs to huddle up for a few minutes to figure out if anybody saw the penalty.
That being said….wanted to address the elephant in the room. Throwing stuff on the ice after a disallowed goal??? Your fanbase gave us a ton of crap for that. Just saying
As stated on broadcast, toronto situation room said the pushing of the pad negated the goal even if they consider this across the line.
I said otherwise in the GDT thread but in my defense, Sportsnet couldn’t draw up this angle.
100% a good goal. But I guess it’s in keeping with last year’s trend 😪
I think we need to go deeper.
Puck passed the line but after the play was dead, I don’t understand what the controversy is
I have to agree with Friedman about utilizing available technology to take the guess out. But it’s so much harder to fix things when there’s a definitive answer.
This league is a joke
Bruh
They never showed this angle once on CBC. They kept showing the angle from inside the net and over top. The whole time I kept saying, “why don’t we get a look from in front of the net?”
Remember when tampas goal counted that wasn’t in
ENHANCE!
Doesn’t matter now buddy. This is just going to infuriate yourself. This sucks but it’s over
Flames fan here.Sad what happened today. I did want the leafs to go far this year and was cheering for them.
Welcome to 2004 for the flames. It was in
At least this had some rationale to it being a no-goal. But the puck over glass penalty in overtime? What glass? Really baffled me.