Thoughts?


Thoughts?

38 comments
  1. This will be the washed up vet signing that finally gets us over the hump…

  2. This is like asking a team 15 years ago, “Do you want Tucker on your team or against you?”

  3. 1yr $800k. Still useful for what he can provide a team like the Leafs. A no-lose situation

  4. I am convinced it is going to be signing some player the fan base thoroughly despises that finally puts us over the top so bring it on.

  5. hardest possible no

    speed and skill should be the priority, not taking needless penalties and clogging up transition play

  6. Pros: we don’t have to play against him.

    Cons: we will make the finals then lose.

  7. Yes please. If there’s one thing that these last few playoffs have proven, it’s that playing dirty works.

  8. People complain all day about how the Leafs have no toughness and then turn their nose up at Corey Perry.

  9. They’re signing him just to rough him up and bully him in the locker room. Fuck this worm

  10. If he’s willing to take minimum, sure. But you need to ensure he has 2 linemates that can skate well to compensate.

  11. Two years ago – 100% yes. Probably would have been a better signing than Simmonds in terms of ability but now….he was pretty ineffective in our series after a handful of ok shifts in the first 1-2 games he was gassed. Not worth it at this point

  12. We’re missing some jam on the bottom six. I don’t see why this isn’t a win-win for our fourth line

Leave a Reply