All in trade?


All in trade?

7 comments
  1. The picks are off a year because I wanted to show what they’d be. It would actually be 2028 first, 2030 top 8 protected, and swaps in 27&29.

    Clippers upgrade the top end of their roster and go all in. Bulls get 3 firsts, 2 swaps and expirings for Levine. Sixers get the 3 best vets from the Clippers and unload Tobias, they have to give up Melton but he could tell them he would be interested in being traded since he’s a Clippers fan and Norm is a 6moy candidate. Thoughts? Who needs more, I’m assuming Bulls? Maybe like Bones and/or Boston?

  2. Why would you trade picks that we are going to need when PG and Kawhi are retired? They aren’t worth that much of the future.

  3. I’d do this. Would like to be able to keep Batum but yeah, I’d add in any of Boston, Bones, Preston or Diabate

  4. Would lavine be the sixth man? I don’t think kawhi could play the 4 and they would prefer a playmaker start at the 1.

  5. This would be the worst trade in NBA history. Well, second to the Rudy Gaubert trade.

  6. Homers always overvalue their own players and draft picks, and will downvote pretty much any trade proposal.

    The fact is this is a feasible trade that absolutely increases our chances of winning a championship with 213. Two of the picks are protected so it’s not going to cost us the next Wemby.

    That said I personally wouldn’t pull the trigger on this. I can get past LaVine not really fitting into our starting lineup, but my main concern is how both Harris and Melton performed in the Sixers-Boston series. Melton especially–he choked hard and missed 3 crucial 3 pointers (like missed badly, almost airballed) in the 4th quarter of game 7.

Leave a Reply