Evolution of the Cincinnati Reds Logo Over the Years
August 22, 2023
Evolution of the Cincinnati Reds Logo Over the Years
23 comments
Bring back Pantone 199
1890 logo is still the best
Intriguing to see that a couple of them weren’t trademarked.
Current iteration is plain bad.
Kinda like that 1900 era block C…Although, I grew up with the 68′-92′ logo.
What is the difference between 99-12 and now?
It’s pretty much been the same since 1953
The 1900 Cleveland Reds
My wife swears that the City Connect “C” is a market test for a new logo.
That 1900 block c is definitely the old guardians logo…
I always loved the 68-92 logo
What is the difference between the last two?
Mid-2023: PAIN
Three World Series during the best logo’s lifetime. Bring. It. Back.
The change to the BetUS logo was subtle enough to pass any immediate notice
We need to go back to the 68-92 logo. That’s when we won all the good stuff.
93-98 is the Reds logo from my youth so I’m a sucker for it.
A fusion of the 68-92 logo and today’s logo would probably look great.
i’ve seen this exact graphic (sans the watermark) multiple times this month and I can’t help but laugh at the 1953-1958 logo being blatantly incorrect on all of them.
Not quite sure how in 1953 they were able to use a logo that wasn’t created until late 1998, or why rebranding away from the red for The Red Scare would prompt them to use more red.
23 comments
Bring back Pantone 199
1890 logo is still the best
Intriguing to see that a couple of them weren’t trademarked.
Current iteration is plain bad.
Kinda like that 1900 era block C…Although, I grew up with the 68′-92′ logo.
What is the difference between 99-12 and now?
It’s pretty much been the same since 1953
The 1900 Cleveland Reds
My wife swears that the City Connect “C” is a market test for a new logo.
That 1900 block c is definitely the old guardians logo…
I always loved the 68-92 logo
What is the difference between the last two?
Mid-2023: PAIN
Three World Series during the best logo’s lifetime. Bring. It. Back.
The change to the BetUS logo was subtle enough to pass any immediate notice
We need to go back to the 68-92 logo. That’s when we won all the good stuff.
93-98 is the Reds logo from my youth so I’m a sucker for it.
A fusion of the 68-92 logo and today’s logo would probably look great.
i’ve seen this exact graphic (sans the watermark) multiple times this month and I can’t help but laugh at the 1953-1958 logo being blatantly incorrect on all of them.
Not quite sure how in 1953 they were able to use a logo that wasn’t created until late 1998, or why rebranding away from the red for The Red Scare would prompt them to use more red.
[This logo](https://www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/7267/Cincinnati_Redlegs/1954/Alternate_Logo) is correct for the time.
I think you mean the “Creds”
1905 one is butt ugly. Where can I buy a tshirt of it?
1968 – 1992 fan here checking in!
I think we can all agree that 68-92 is the best and needs to be brought back