Do y’all think DG is talking about Beal?


Because I think he is (and I think he is right)

3 comments
  1. 1. He defined Bradley Beal exactly who else could it be? A scorer who got paid a lot but doesn’t win and “even if you put him with 2 other all-stars”? Its him

    2. The point about low IQ and how a good amount of unqualified people are in high level jobs is one of the biggest realizations anyone has getting to a high level of a given industry. The Emperor rarely has clothes

  2. Well, he said there are more players like that in the league than the other way around.

    And I guess Beal would be a name a lot of people might put on that list.

    Guess we’ll all find out what the answer is in the next couple of years.

  3. Nah, Beal is just a number 2 or 3 who was miscast after a number 1. We’ve seen him be successful when he’s not excepted to be “the guy”.

Leave a Reply