Let’s settle this. Which era did you like better?


Let’s settle this. Which era did you like better?

22 comments
  1. Lob city was a way better regular season product. Those playoff series were way more oppressive tho with the way we would inexplicably implode. When healthy, I’ve always felt confident watching 213. So I’m going with them. Plus wcf obviously

  2. Lob City was more fun to watch over 82 games, but they never had the potential of this 213 squad to actually compete for a title.

    I’ll reserve final judgment until Kawhi and PG are no longer Clippers.

  3. lob city, at least they were able to play most of the playoffs. And, man those dunks kept us glued to our seats.

  4. I’m bias, but I really enjoyed the entertainment value that the lob city era brought us. It might not have amounted to much success, but it was darn fun to watch.

  5. Lob City was consistently entertaining. They obviously had injuries, but the core guys played together a lot.

    I don’t think Leonard and George have even played half of their games together as Clippers.

  6. Even though Lob city was fun, I don’t think we were ever serious contenders. Chris Paul is a great player but he’s not at the same level of greatness as Kawhi.

  7. Lob City reg season games were an event. You never knew if another Mozgov, Perkins, or Knight were going to happen. I didn’t want to leave my seat during a game.

Leave a Reply