What an unsuccessful ‘All In’ looks like in terms of dead cap. We are paying for 2020/21/22.


What an unsuccessful ‘All In’ looks like in terms of dead cap. We are paying for 2020/21/22.

22 comments
  1. It was unsuccessful because it was never truly “All In” Gute was already planning for his idea of the future before the window closed.

  2. If it had been an all in the Love pick would have been a reciever and we would have landed a good FA reciever but instead we half assed it.

  3. Gute didn’t go ‘All In’, he went considerably in but refused to use draft capital to attain elite assets. It wasn’t just the Love pick. If he traded multiple 1sts for good players like the Rams, maybe Rodgers would have another ring. But it is very hard to win in the nfl and maybe Love will be okay. I’m not opposed to Gute but just disagree with the premise.

  4. Man we really could’ve traded our entire 2020/2021 drafts in picks for talent to surround rodgers and they wasted it on pure crap.

  5. Pretty much every comment here is calling you out for saying we went all-in, but it’s true. We just chose to spend all of our cash retaining our own guys instead of getting free agents. Not the typical way teams go all-in, but still a form of it.

    We sacrificed the future for the present in 2020-2022, and that’s what going all-in means regardless of what it looks like.

  6. The Packers have $57m in dead cap. The Eagles have $54m and are one of the best teams in the league.

  7. They should have plenty of cap room from 20 and 21 since those drafts were so horrible. 1 guy from 2020 is still on the team and only 3 from 2021. At most 2 of them will get a second contract with the Packers

  8. We’ve never been all-in and that was decided the day they traded up to get Love. This is what a mix of half-assed all-in and half-assed build for the future looks like

  9. Nuthin’ screams all in like using your 1st and 4th round picks on a QB and sittin him for 3 years.

    Nuthin.

  10. This is what the team looks like when Gute ignores an important skill position for years

  11. Lol @ you thinking anything they did was “all in”.

    Most of it wasn’t even “in”.

    You don’t trade up to draft a QB in the 1st if you’re going in whatsoever.

  12. Where was the “All In” part? Was it Sammy Watkins? Devin Funchess? Oh, I know it must have been trading up for a QB in the 1st round after an NFC Championship Game appearance. One who couldn’t even manage to win the backup job or be active for a single game his rookie year. Or maybe it was drafting a backup RB? Or a “TE” who can’t block or catch. Or maybe it was deciding to not draft the best available center? Or was it lowballing the best receiver in the game and alienating the best QB in franchise history.

    Please, point me to the “All In” part.

  13. This team did NOT go “all in”, they jumped into the deep end, quickly swam back to the shallow end, then refused to jump back into the deep end.

Leave a Reply