“Vesey could fit into their bottom six over Jesper Fast” ……yeah, no.
I feel like Chatty is the wrong piece to consider moving currently.
ETA: I think Chatty should be a long term piece of our team. He’s undervalued just like Slavin.
Don’t ever disrespect quickie like that…
No bullshit, Chatty is our best defensemen. Not gonna happen.
It’s cool chatty is getting recognized
This is like that article where the flyers were gonna receive Pesce for like a bag of bolts and Hart.
the rangers should consider eating my whole dick and ass
lol…that’s ridiculous. Chatty is worth WAY more than Vesey and a third.
If they call GMDW with that offer, the response should be something like “Those are decent add-ons, but who’s the main player? If it’s Trocheck and you’ll retain 50%, we can talk.”
Those guys in New York are delusional, aren’t they? First the Aho is dirty nonsense and now this. Crazy.
Ah yes I’m sure we will trade a key defenseman to our rival for a 3rd round and a mediocre depth guy. This dude shouldn’t have a job.
I really like Chatfield but think this would make sense (although not with the return listed). People are saying to trade TdA, but right now his return value would be super low.
Chatfield is clearly being underutilized in our system and if we are to try and change something I think he would be a decent piece to move.
Man anyone can be a sports reporter these days
The Rangers should absolutely consider it and waste all that time.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA yes other teams exist to send the Rangers their players. What a fucking typical take from NY media
My official response:
Bagels are a lesser form of biscuit.
yeah… totally gonna trade a rising star for a guy who’s older, has worse performances and stats, less playoff experience, and costs more.
we’ll get RIGHT on that.
you know, people would stop saying Rangers fans know jack all about the sport if Rangers fans didn’t ***constantly*** prove they know jack all about the sport
Typical smooth-brained NY media take.
>That lowly country hockey club should be overjoyed to consider the esteemed Rangers to take one of their most cost-effective two-way D-men for little to no benefit.
What a dogshit take
Ship em TDA for a large pizza and a night in Soho
The Rangers should consider taking Tony DeAngelo in exchange for Panarin and a 4th.
Content farm THAT.
Chatfield is a goddamn gem and I refuse to see him sullied by a Rags jersey. They don’t deserve him.
Lmao, they want Chatfield for nothing. Delusional. Rags can suck it.
23 comments
Pass, you guys can have Tony D back, though.
“Vesey could fit into their bottom six over Jesper Fast” ……yeah, no.
I feel like Chatty is the wrong piece to consider moving currently.
ETA: I think Chatty should be a long term piece of our team. He’s undervalued just like Slavin.
Don’t ever disrespect quickie like that…
No bullshit, Chatty is our best defensemen. Not gonna happen.
It’s cool chatty is getting recognized
This is like that article where the flyers were gonna receive Pesce for like a bag of bolts and Hart.
the rangers should consider eating my whole dick and ass
lol…that’s ridiculous. Chatty is worth WAY more than Vesey and a third.
If they call GMDW with that offer, the response should be something like “Those are decent add-ons, but who’s the main player? If it’s Trocheck and you’ll retain 50%, we can talk.”
Those guys in New York are delusional, aren’t they? First the Aho is dirty nonsense and now this. Crazy.
Ah yes I’m sure we will trade a key defenseman to our rival for a 3rd round and a mediocre depth guy. This dude shouldn’t have a job.
I really like Chatfield but think this would make sense (although not with the return listed). People are saying to trade TdA, but right now his return value would be super low.
Chatfield is clearly being underutilized in our system and if we are to try and change something I think he would be a decent piece to move.
Man anyone can be a sports reporter these days
The Rangers should absolutely consider it and waste all that time.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA yes other teams exist to send the Rangers their players. What a fucking typical take from NY media
My official response:
Bagels are a lesser form of biscuit.
yeah… totally gonna trade a rising star for a guy who’s older, has worse performances and stats, less playoff experience, and costs more.
we’ll get RIGHT on that.
you know, people would stop saying Rangers fans know jack all about the sport if Rangers fans didn’t ***constantly*** prove they know jack all about the sport
Typical smooth-brained NY media take.
>That lowly country hockey club should be overjoyed to consider the esteemed Rangers to take one of their most cost-effective two-way D-men for little to no benefit.
What a dogshit take
Ship em TDA for a large pizza and a night in Soho
The Rangers should consider taking Tony DeAngelo in exchange for Panarin and a 4th.
Content farm THAT.
Chatfield is a goddamn gem and I refuse to see him sullied by a Rags jersey. They don’t deserve him.
Lmao, they want Chatfield for nothing. Delusional. Rags can suck it.