Dodgers apparently interested in Ohtani *and* Trout, according to Héctor Gomes


https://x.com/hgomez27/status/1725738742575468934?s=46&t=t0SN7tSjMrFfEcMcqHRxiQ

12 comments
  1. If Friedman wasn’t going to go longer than 5 years for Harper why would he take on Trouts contract? You would have both Trout & Betts making around 70m combined the last several years of both of their contracts in there late 30’s. I could easily see Trout having to be a DH and honestly years from now we have no idea what Betts body will be like.

  2. Look if the Angels get convinced to eat a bunch of Trout’s salary *and then* trade him to their crosstown rival *and then* we sign Ohtani, you can catch me at the Church of Andrew Friedman every Sunday because that would be the biggest miracle since biblical times no exaggeration

  3. Ohtani I can see but Angels trading Trout to the Dodgers is too risky for the Angels and might be for the Dodgers as well.

  4. Anaheim would take a chunk of it. People saying its bad uhh do you kno who Mike Trout is ? One of the best players of all time granted hes been injured. But you make the move for Trout everytime

Leave a Reply