Rate this jersey out of 10

33 comments

1. 6

   It’s not bad but something about the proportions doesn’t look right.

   Might look better in action.

2. 0

3. 7… and is that James Vanderbeek?! Lol

4. 2/10. Pretty boring, especially for a Vegas team.

5. Not a fan. 3/10

6. It looks like the V is flipping the double bird. That alone makes it a 6/10

7. You can’t beat Vagas heritage

8. Back is stellar. Front seems like misused space. 4/10

9. 0

10. Whatever the numerical equivalent of “meh” is. I don’t hate it, but it’s not great. Maybe 5.5/10

11. V always looks like Vancouver to me.

    Unimaginative.

    5/10

12. Is it just me or does the top of the V look like 2 middle fingers?

13. Yucky

14. 0/10 fking ugly and bland

15. Looks like a wedding dress

16. Can I give it a negative number?

17. Not a big fan of the font style

18. Soft 2.

19. Mehhh

20. 6 it’s definitely fugly

21. 0 😖

22. 0/10 unbiased opinion not still bitter at all

23. The winter classic patch is literally the only part of it that looks good.

24. 5/10 I like the V design itself but somehow the entire thing ends up looking more boring than the Vancouver V

25. That’s a solid -4

26. 1. No just no

27. Pair it with a blindingly golden helmet and bam, 1/10.

28. A new team trying to pass off a vintage jersey… I’m not a fan.

29. 8 if it was a Canucks sweater, but a 2 for Golden Knights

30. Is 0 an option?

31. 2/10 because the number font is pretty cool

32. Come on folks, pretty good for a pre schooler with a box of broken crayons

33. 1.5